




What do you expect any leader of any nation under invasion by a much more powerful force than its own do? Seriously, let Zelinsky aside, what should have done any other president of Ukraine in these circumstances according to you? Immediately surrender? Flee? Die?
Of course a leader is going to fight back and defend its country, what the hell did you expect? And any reasonable leader would have entered any alliances he needs to in order to protect his country, his people.
I am amazed at those ruskies who think everyone should just fall over and let the red army march over them. Even the smallest country has its pride and will fight back.
Last edited by Vankrys; 2023-12-05 at 09:52 PM.

I am bit surprised that someone can actually think that North Korea isn't a hellhole, or that China would never spy on other countries...Or that coronavirus did not originate in China.

As it turns out, Sovereign nations -really- don't like being invaded by their neighbors, and they -really- don't like it when the invading forces use their civilians as target practice.
But, no, him fighting tooth and nail against Russia's forces must be some grand conspiracy and how dare he put the civilians that Russia keeps deliberately shooting at in danger by not immediately surrendering and capitulating to a regime that's been incredibly honest about how much they want Ukraine as a culture to vanish off the face of the planet.
Last edited by Xyonai; 2023-12-05 at 10:04 PM.

You are pushing a quite a conspiracy theory if you think Reuters is not legit as the worlds most renown news agency and you believe all the conspiracies you listed above earlier.
Because it's ironic. You hate/discredit all western media and leadership, but same time if we think the same about russian stuff, we're the ones in the wrong...?
It's a particular sort of enlightened neutral middle party act who just happens to tell you to consider America as the literal worst thing ever while making excuses for all the rest. He's probably going to go on and cite/quote Chomsky or Mearsheimer next, thinking it makes him very special and above the rest of the intellectual rabble.
IMO those are even more insufferable than the actual, honest to goodness pro-Russians/China people. At least they own up to their views and don't try to spin a spider's web of coy excuses around them.
It is all that is left unsaid upon which tragedies are built -Kreia
The internet: where to every action is opposed an unequal overreaction.

I mean, when their talking heads keep talking about how much they wanna eliminate Ukrainians while their soldiers spent a good chunk of the first year of the war abusing and murdering Ukrainian noncombatants like it was a national sport, I'm inclined to believe them just this one time. As a treat.

russia is pushing really hard in the information sphere of late, pushing a lot of untruths and mistruths and half-truths and using useful idiots to try and amplify it. They need support to Ukraine to stop because they are badly stuck. Problem is that while the US is having difficulties due to the useful idiots in the republican party, there is still support coming in. Finland just announced it is going to manufacture heavy artillery ammunition for Ukraine for starters, and a number of other European nations have made announcements in the last week of continuing support being sent.
November saw russia take some of its heaviest losses for the whole war, not just claimed losses but verified losses. And what did they get for a few tens of thousands of casualties? 4 square kilometers. For a month. At that rate it'll take 150 years to reach Kyiv. And casualties in the millions.
Speaking of - there seem to be a lot of russian soldiers missing. We know they invaded with 200K men, plus the Donbass puppets. As things bogged down, thew threw in almost their entire army, called up reserves, drained Donbass try of men, and sought volunteers. When that didn't work they mobilised 300k more men, took 100k more out of prisons and claim that this year had another 400k 'volunteers'. And yet they still only have 400k men in Ukraine. So somewhere along the line 600k+ men have disappeared.
They aren't being kept back training and they aren't manning the borders with NATO, so it is possible Ukraine's numbers may be close to truth. 300k dead, another 300k+ wounded and crippled.
This is a domestic issue for Israel. While US policy towards Israel (and other nations policy towards Israel) has a role in this overall, it remains a domestic issue for Israel and not some example of the west puppeteering states.
Damn, almost like the war in Ukraine and the war in Israel are to wildly different conflicts, between wildly different groups and with wildly different histories?
Though if you're going to invoke Kissinger I do hope you realize that most of this thread probably danced at the news of his death and he likely doesn't have many fans here. The dunks you think you're getting are seeming to be airballs.
Then I'd have to guess you've spent as little time paying attention to that conflict and the history there as you have the war in Ukraine. Not getting more into it than that as this is the Russia thread, my dude.
It's weird how you think the US, which is a shitshow itself, is actually also secretly manipulating all these nations around the world so expertly, secretly, and effectively.
Meanwhile, the US is struggling to pass a budget because the Republican party in control of the House spent 3 weeks picking someone to lead them and the best they could do on the other end was a continuing resolution.
Like, these theories are honestly so detached from observable reality they're hilarious.
The full pictures are there because the whole song and dance has been performed here and elsewhere a number of times. Don't get offended, as you like to say. It's just an observation that your opinion isn't as unique as you seem to believe.
American foreign policy isn't different from the policies of other powers like China or Russia. It's the classic realpolitik outlook of spheres and influence and crisis management (or causing a crisis and using it). The only real difference is that America's policies work more often due to 1. them being able to throw outrageous amount of resources at a problem compared to their peers, 2. having fairly reliable allies (mostly in Western Europe) and 3. usually accompanying their hegemony with actual benefits so that a fair amount of nations want to participate in it. It's no coincidence that, say, NATO keeps expanding, because the benefits of NATO are clearer the closer you get to Russia. It's no coincidence that those Asian countries that don't want to be influenced/conquered by China go to daddy USA instead. It's not about the media when it comes to higher level decisions, it's flatly because America, when it wants to, can be pretty good at showing why you should join its club, whereas others are mostly good at threatening people outside their club instead which isn't as effective most of the time.
When other powers try to add benefits to their sphere of influence, it tends to not work as well. China tried real hard with the Belt And Road business and propping out African infrastructure but the former is a massive investment money pit and the latter mostly served to trap underdeveloped countries with astronomical repayments.
Besides, going on about how bad the Americans are RE meddling on other's business in a thread about Russia outright trying to annex its neighbor out of imperialist motivations while using the most transparent bullshit as excuses is pretty gauche if you ask me. There's a thread about Israel right there where I'll definitely agree that America is not helping matters at all within the context of not only Palestine but the Middle East in general. The entire region's modern geopolitical landscape is built on one American foreign policy failure after the other across decades. It definitely shows them at their worst. But the thread is about Russia and Ukraine, which aren't in the Middle East.
It is all that is left unsaid upon which tragedies are built -Kreia
The internet: where to every action is opposed an unequal overreaction.