
Please do, if your intention is to divert the discussion to whataboutism and to shill for russians doing a genocide in Ukraine, which this topic is about. If you can't connect the dots that have proven thousand times over that russians are acting like nazis, not good guys, then you could as well find an echo chamber that fits your propaganda.

A certain group of people have discovered that "the West" is not, in fact, the great and the good they were told as children, and is actually bad. But because they have no real critical thinking skills, they conclude that anyone opposed to "the West" must therefore be good, and cheerlead for them instead.
Last edited by DarkTZeratul; 2023-12-31 at 08:39 PM.

Indeed, we should endeavor to be as normal and calm as you are on the subject; calling other posers psychotic zombies with diarrhea dripping from their brains who need to take their meds is the very pinnacle of smart and productive discussion after all.
Anyway, some small-time dude accidentally falling from a window into radioactive bullets isn't very surprising. I'm not even sure it's related to the war or anything, just business as usual power struggles among the lower ranks.
It is all that is left unsaid upon which tragedies are built -Kreia
The internet: where to every action is opposed an unequal overreaction.
I'm less inclined to believe there's some "narrative" and much more inclined to believe reporting just covers the state of things. Sometimes that means good news for Ukraine with victories and more supplies, sometimes that means bad news as an advance is progressing slower than anticipated or Russians are pushing back elsewhere. Wars are always evolving and changing, there's no real singular "narrative" or anything. I'd imagine there's a fair amount of pro-Ukraine bias in western media, but that's not entirely surprising or unexpected.
Remind us how many times NATO has taken actions as an alliance, again? I won't pretend every NATO action has been perfect and flawless and without criticism, but the way some folks talk about NATO you'd think NATO was actually just the US military having a global presence. US military and NATO are different, and if we want a discussion about American militarism that's for an entirely separate thread.
It is all that is left unsaid upon which tragedies are built -Kreia
The internet: where to every action is opposed an unequal overreaction.

His point is that too many people focus on how "WE" (as in the West) see NATO rather than how NATO is seen by the rest of the world (which is everyone else). NATO is not necessarily seen as a defensive organization but also as some kind of mean of pressure.
And many people just aggregate countries, members of NATO, and NATO itself when those countries do some weird shit (like Libya and such, while NATO itself had nothing to do with it).

A German media crew was in a hotel in Kharkiv known to be frequented by foreign media that was deliberately attacked by russia. None of them were harmed but their translator was wounded.
https://www.zdf.de/nachrichten/polit...sland-100.html
“Do not lose time on daily trivialities. Do not dwell on petty detail. For all of these things melt away and drift apart within the obscure traffic of time. Live well and live broadly. You are alive and living now. Now is the envy of all of the dead.” ~ Emily3, World of Tomorrow
Words to live by.

Bollocks. That's straight russkie talking points. The west does not want to control Ukraine - only russia is interested in that.
And even if it was true (it's not) it would be way, way preferable compared to what russia has planned. (Genocide, mass re-education, extermination of large parts of the population who refuse to convert)
“Do not lose time on daily trivialities. Do not dwell on petty detail. For all of these things melt away and drift apart within the obscure traffic of time. Live well and live broadly. You are alive and living now. Now is the envy of all of the dead.” ~ Emily3, World of Tomorrow
Words to live by.



We knew exactly what would happen to Ukraine if we tried to stir things there too. It has been made public by various Russian and western officials throughout the years. We knew that Ukraine was their red line.
Yes it's Russia's fault for invading, but west is equally guilty. This war wasn't "unprovoked" as the western and nato officials are saying. Basically wherever west goes, chaos erupts at some point.
Also Russians dude are not acting like Nazis but rather very constraint in this war. They could raise cities to the ground if they wanted it to but they dont.
- - - Updated - - -
https://www.militaire.gr/ta-korakia-...-tin-oykrania/
Use google translate.
Last edited by Ulmita; 2024-01-01 at 10:11 AM.
1) You do know that the nazi's didn’t raze cities, right?
That was the soviet tactic.
2) No, this is all Russia. They talk about how NATO is aggressing towards them, but every NATO measure is because Russia was doing shit that wanted the border countries like Poland to get more defenses.
Zelensky didn’t like NATO. Guy literally made a video about him entering their headquarters, pull out 2 Uzis and gun down every member inside. BUT THEN RUSSIA STARTED SHIT WHICH MADE HIM CHANGE HIS MIND!
Sweden and Finland were fine not being part of NATO. BUT THEN RUSSIA STARTED SHIT SO THEY JOINED NATO!
NATO gets closer to Russia because Russia gives countries a reason to want more NATO defenses.
And Ukraine is a really good example of why the countries takes Russia's movements serious. Because they have no idea whether Russia is flexing or trying something.
And funnily enough, with Ukraine, we knew for ages they were planning something, and NATO did NOTHING! Like they're actually staying true to be a defensive pact or something.
Strange, isn't it?

What Ukraine does is Ukraine's business. Russia does not get to have a "red line" about Ukraine's actions, because Ukraine is a sovereign nation whose affairs Russia has absolutely no say in.
No, they aren't, because Ukraine is a sovereign nation that can make its own geopolitical alliances and if Russia doesn't like it they can pound sand.Yes it's Russia's fault for invading, but west is equally guilty.
Yes, it was, and this line of thinking makes absolutely no sense if you think about it for even a moment. The idea is that "the west" somehow provoked Russia into invading Ukraine by doing... What, exactly? Being friendly with Ukraine? Because lest you forget, they didn't force themselves upon Ukraine. Ukraine asked to join NATO, and was actually told that no. Among the reasons for that decision was that Ukraine was still embroiled in open conflict with Russia, who invaded Ukraine in 2014 when they took Crimea.This war wasn't "unprovoked" as the western and nato officials are saying.
Okay, now I know you're just uncritically parroting Russian propaganda, because A) no they fucking haven't been constrained, Jesus fucking Christ there is an entire Wikipedia page on the war crimes they've committed, from abducting Ukrainian children to torturing and mutilating Ukrainian captives to the wholesale massacre of civilians in Bucha and Izium to targeting hospitals nuclear plants to just an absolute metric fuckton of rape; and B) no they fucking can't raze cities to the ground if they wanted to, because if they could they would have done so already, and are you seriously so dumb you think they're throwing Cold War-era armaments at Ukraine because they're just so decent and honorable they don't want to use the good shit?Also Russians dude are not acting like Nazis but rather very constraint in this war. They could raise cities to the ground if they wanted it to but they dont.
Last edited by DarkTZeratul; 2024-01-01 at 10:41 AM.