BBC: Ukraine says it sank Russian submarine in Crimea
- - - Updated - - -Ukraine's military says it attacked and destroyed a Russian submarine while it was anchored at a port in the occupied Crimean peninsula.
The Rostov-on-Don, a kilo-class attack submarine launched in 2014, sank after it was struck in a missile attack on the port city of Sevastopol on Friday, Ukraine's general staff said in a statement.
It was reportedly one of four submarines operated by Russia's Black Sea fleet capable of launching Kalibr cruise missiles. The Russian defence ministry has not commented.
Officials in Kyiv said the attack also destroyed four S-400 air defence systems protecting the peninsula, which Russia illegally annexed in 2014.
Intelligence officials in the UK noted last September that the Rostov-on-Don "likely suffered catastrophic damage" in a missile strike while undergoing maintenance at a Sevastopol shipyard.
Ukraine's military said Russia subsequently repaired the vessel and it was recently testing its capabilities near Sevastopol. The vessel was worth $300m (£233m), they added.
"The destruction of Rostov-on-Don once again proves that there is no safe place for the Russian fleet in the Ukrainian territorial waters of the Black Sea," the general staff in Kyiv said in a statement on Saturday.
It marks the latest attack on Russian naval forces in Sevastopol in recent months. In March alone, Ukraine said it hit two landing ships and a patrol vessel in the port city.
Since Russia launched its unprovoked invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 it has suffered several major naval setbacks. Ukraine says it has seriously damaged or sunk at least 15 warships, including the Black Sea fleet's flagship, the Moskva.
Last week Ukraine's military said Moscow had been forced to withdraw all of its naval assets from the Sea of Azov - a body of water connected to the Black Sea - due to repeated strikes on its vessels.
And Russia's internal security service, the FSB, recently said it foiled a Ukrainian plot to destroy its last remaining aircraft carrier, the Admiral Kuznetsov. The ship, launched in 1985, has been undergoing repairs since 2018.
Well, Russia has completely removed it's naval forces from the Sea of Azov, so... yeah.
But subs take years and years to build. They have some in construction elsewhere, of course.
R.I.P. Democracy
"The difference between stupidity
and genius is that genius has its limits."
--Alexandre Dumas-fils
In case you forgot (or in case you didn't know, because your lack of knowledge of history is eminent), WW2 was 80-85 years ago.
Germany lost 10% of its population in WW2, including an entire generation of young men. And Germany did poorly for a long time before things got better. Hell, the Berlin Wall didn't even come down for another 45 years.
Similar thing in Japan, where nukes were actually used.
...
I can just hear you thinking that the best way to "help" Russia would be to nuke them, then maybe they'd be doing well in another 80 years!
Just stop.
- - - Updated - - -
A trip of months, sure, but much faster than the 7 years to completely build a new one, even if it were safe to do so in Sevastopol.
R.I.P. Democracy
"The difference between stupidity
and genius is that genius has its limits."
--Alexandre Dumas-fils
Even that wont help them there unless they want those subs to just hang around in the Mediterranean and not actually reach the black sea.
Turkey wont let nations at war move military vessels through the bosphorus, as part of the montreux convention, a treaty dating back all the way to 1936.
The German and Swedish air forces scrambled NATO jets on Aug. 3 after two Russian jets were detected heading toward Latvian airspace over the Baltic Sea.
The German Air Force reported that the jets from NATO's Baltic air-policing mission identified two Russian Su-30s.
The Russian pilots "behaved uncooperatively but not aggressively," the German Air Force said.
I'll admit it's disappointing when news puts in a headline/title like that only to read the article and find out it's literally nothing.
They fucked around with Turkey during the Syrian civil war and found out.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_R...u-24_shootdown
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
they won't because they do this petty shit knowing no one will mess with them over it. Emphasis on "petty"
how this would go down:
>a couple of bumbling soldiers push their luck and NATO kills them
>NATO confronts Russia on what the fuck this was
>Russia dismisses it as the actions of a few rogue imbeciles
>NATO accepts and both go back to status quo tensions
they'll never invoke MAD or war over these petty incidents
Not just Russia that does this, few years ago the Royal Navy fucked around and found out in Iranian waters, bunch of Marines got captured, "honest mistake guv, definitely not spying".
In what we're talking about, which was planes pushing towards national borders, they'd tell them to fuck off, and when they don't fuck off and cross the border, they'll get a final warning, and then they'll get shot down.
And then Russia gets to whine about it and suck it up and deal. They get nothing. They get told to wise up and fuck off with their bullshit, we'll see if we can send your soldiers back if we can find bits of them to return, but that's it.
If their aircraft return fire or fire pre-emptively, then it's an act of war by Russia and all of NATO is gonna be getting ready to stomp on Russia's nutsack repeatedly.
There isn't any "confrontation" with Russia. Shooting down their jets is statement enough.
I sure hope that everyone understands the difference between national airspace and "flying towards it/flying without transponder".
So did Turkey afterwards, just not immediately
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_Balyun_airstrikes plus IIRC couple other more minor episodes resulting in dead Turkish soldiers.