Again, you're assuming, based on absolutely nothing, that there's a legitimate argument to be made on how he could turn the invasion back.
All indications are that Putin lacks the personnel and materiel to do so meaningfully.
When you've got nothing but bluster, and the enemy isn't paying attention to bluster, you're out of options. At this point, I'm pretty sure the only real constraints on Ukraine are their own logistical capacity to hold what territory they've taken. And they may choose to not try and hold territory defensively, but just push to strike more-valuable targets deeper into Russia, forcing Putin to raze his own lands to keep resources out of Ukraininian forces' hands. Which is a victory for Ukraine.
I have a dream that Musk wasn't such a bitch, and he would authorize the modification of the Starship to carry 150 metric tonnes of tungsten balls and 100 metric tonnes of explosive filler, so we could be wiping entire zip codes empty from orc invaders per pop.
Infracted.
Last edited by Flarelaine; 2024-08-13 at 09:23 PM. Reason: Advocating for mass destruction
Russia has tried to plead with the UN to condemn Ukraine for "abhorrent crimes." Apparently, the UN council gave Russia the cold shoulder.
Russia criticized Western allies of Ukraine at the United Nations on Tuesday for not condemning Kyiv's incursion into the Russian region of Kursk, accusing Ukrainian forces of killing civilians and questioning the goals of the cross-border assault.
Ukraine's allies on the U.N. Security Council - including the United States, France and Britain - stood firm in their support for Kyiv during an informal council gathering convened by Russia. They did not mention the Kursk offensive.
"We will not recognize the aggressor as the victim," said senior Slovenian diplomat Klemen Ponikvar, one of several members to accuse Russia of hypocrisy, double standards and wasting the Security Council's time.
There are reports pootie has changed the kursk commander again, only a week after putting the fsb in charge. The new commander is a former bodyguard.
the problem with that last bit you mentioned, and some commentators brought up: If Putin starts desperately razing his own land and everyone on it just to get rid of the Ukrainians, that's a huge moral risk to Ukraine because they're playing with the lives of their soldiers.
It's not a good outlook to try to poke at Putin and go "get mad, do it" and hope he does some insane shit since it will undoubtedly take the lives of these soldiers.
That just means they can't resupply off the land, and might go home. It doesn't mean they're all destroyed.
And even then, the nature of being a soldier is to put your life on the line for your country. Soldiers dying is tragic but expected. As long as they're achieving successes along the way (and this is already a massive success), the sacrifice is worth the trade. The soldiers knew what they were in for.
Losing them would not in any way be a "moral risk". Putin razing his own territory, on the other hand, would be.
You don't have any idea what you're talking about. Destroying stores and gas stations so Ukrainian forces can't resupply and might have to go home is not killing those soldiers. It means they might go home.It's not a good outlook to try to poke at Putin and go "get mad, do it" and hope he does some insane shit since it will undoubtedly take the lives of these soldiers.
Russia sure has been putting the special in special operation.
The total number of evacuated civilians in russia is now meant to be around 200,000, while Ukraine claims to now hold 74 russian settlements.
Meanwhile, russia is digging new trench lines in Kursk - 45 km from the border. That's a lot of ground to give up, and you still need the troops in them to actually man them.
And the Belgorod region governor has declared a regional level state of emergency, and wants the Kremlin to upgrade it to a federal level of emergency, just like in Kursk.
R.I.P. Democracy
"The difference between stupidity
and genius is that genius has its limits."
--Alexandre Dumas-fils
Troops from Kaliningrad to Kursk
Reeks of desperation to be honest.
Wasn't the whole point of this war supposed to be that they didn't feel safe with NATO as a neighbor?
But apparently they feel safe enough to pull troops out of the lone portion of Russian territory that's literally surrounded by NATO countries?
Boy, that makes it seem like Putin wasn't being honest...
R.I.P. Democracy
"The difference between stupidity
and genius is that genius has its limits."
--Alexandre Dumas-fils
I had said this before… if Russia had succeeded in taking over, they’d have increased their border with NATO.
And even if they pull out of Ukraine tomorrow, their border with NATO has increased since their little three day operation began, what with NATO’s newest members.
NATO surrounds Russia more now than ever, and it’s all Russia’s doing.
“Do not lose time on daily trivialities. Do not dwell on petty detail. For all of these things melt away and drift apart within the obscure traffic of time. Live well and live broadly. You are alive and living now. Now is the envy of all of the dead.” ~ Emily3, World of Tomorrow
Words to live by.