My estimation is that the US finally got an excuse to stomp on Russia economically, like they fought an economic war against USSR in 1980's but now it's far more one-sided; and now that they have this excuse, they will pressuring until Russia collapses somewhere in the future. Even if Europe surrenders to Russian energy clout, USA has too much to win and almost nothing to lose. So, "a diplomatic fashion" would be an internal Russian collapse and a new Yeltsin ruining it even further.
Stop now. Stop digging. That's again Russian propaganda. The statistical odds for a right wing insurgency are higher in Germany or Austria than they are in Ukraine. Because unlike Ukraine those countries literally elect neo-Nazis into government and the actual standing military and police forces have significant issues with neo-Nazis in their ranks.
First, there is no Russian claim about their stockpile, two, we know they keep firing more and more missiles thus they do have them left, three, they are not idiots and would have a strategic reserve left for the primary opponent, it's how militaries operate.
The really funny thing is that on the Runet you can see all kinds of Russians, from de facto fascists to democrats being happy about one thing - oligarchs loosing their stupidly expensive toys and properties, most of which are guaranteed to have come from illegally (or at least dubiously) acquired money.
prevent? we're well passed that. Zillensky is still open to diplomacy, in fact he is demanding it, and the US should be chief among those states that says diplomacy is the solution to this. thankfully Joe Biden has rebuffed the no-fly-zone nonsense, but the sanctions on average Russian citizens is not going to affect the oligarchs or Putin.
- - - Updated - - -
I'M NOT THE ONE SAYING THAT POINTING THIS OBVIOUS FACT OUT IS RUSSIAN PROPOGANDA.
How would anyone be shocked and suprised that any kind of insurgency might pop up in any territory in an aftermath of any war? Your guys army is performing drunken genocide in several cities, of fucking course there's resistance, both now and years from now, no matter the outcome.
Besides, you're just repeating russian propaganda with the "extremist groups". By definition, the most extremist of groups is right now invading a sovereign country.
I dunno. I doubt Putin would commit so many resources and risk so much pushback for two provinces. Donbass isn't poor or anything but are those really prizes worth a war + sanctions over? Especially when rebels friendly to him already had a lot of control over those regions anyway?
Na, I think his goal was what happened in Crimea; for the Russian army to just roll in practically unopposed and dictate what would happen from now on, only Ukraine-wide. Get rid of a NATO-friendly government, secure their border, and (IMO most importantly) seize all the territory's plentiful resources and secure them either via occupation or a puppet government. That's why the Russian army was so unprepared, the plan was for Ukraine to keel over, not resist. Getting only Donbass out of the deal would absolutely not be worth all the resources sank into the adventure to say nothing of the sanctions.
Or hell, maybe the Kremlin drank its own kool-aid and really thought the Ukrainian government was a bunch of drug-addled ultranazis merely days away from throwing chemical weapons at Russia or whatever. Who the hell knows at this point.
It is all that is left unsaid upon which tragedies are built -Kreia
The internet: where to every action is opposed an unequal overreaction.
you insist on talking about the Ukrainian government when I have never, at any point in this discussion, brought up right wing elements within the Ukrainian government. I am talking exclusively about militias that are operating outside of the influence of the Ukrainian government. who, stand to benefit from an entire country being destabilized. that's been my point, but you seem intent on ignoring what I say in exchange for reading between lines that aren't there.