Not to be rude, but what does this have to do with anything I mentioned? Skimming the article, it seems to be regarding government officials intentionally lying to reporters and news agencies, who then go on to propagate a lie that they believed came from a credible source. This doesn't seem relevant to the idea that many journalists -- war journalists, in particular -- are secretly government assets that are intentionally seeking to deceive or peddle government-mandated "truths". However, please correct me if I misunderstood.
- - - Updated - - -
This may be the core of the confusion here: does your definition of "government agent," as per your original post, include journalists who unknowingly propagated a lie (i.e.: news sources who were leaked the information and believed the source credible)? If so, it might just be a semantics problem we're having.

Recent Blue Posts
Recent Forum Posts
Combat Philosophy and Addon Disarmament in Midnight
MMO-Champion


Reply With Quote


