You weren't being boiled, is the thing.
Again; no one forced you to alienate your neighbors. Your actions did that. So like I said - doing nothing would have benefited Russia far more.
I like how "not invading in the first place" is apparently not a consideration. Rofl.There are a lot of considerations stopping that - most of all, Western response to invasion.
The unacceptability of wars of conquest has been an established part of international law for almost a century now. Sanctions, as an alternative to direct military action, are entirely acceptable.
And what I said still applies: doing nothing would have benefited Russia far more, part two.
And thanks to Russia's policies it has neither welfare nor security. Something you yourself admit when you keep having to default to 'but muh nukes'.Welfare without security
Doing nothing would have benefited Russia far more, part three.