Yep! Nothing to worry about! I am sure their CIWS equivalents will be fine, just leave those ships close to the coast. The admirals said those ships were survivable against the USN, they shouldn't need to worry about some old Harpoon missiles that literally expire next year (The UK stockpile expires in 2023, it is a significant problem for the Royal Navy, who couldn't afford to replace them)
I view it like this. Let them in, but give them deadlines to meet the social and economic policies over the course of several years or their membership is suspended. Having two forms of EU admission, with conditions met/unmet, seems like a better means of expanding it than spending sometimes decades with no significant progress made.
Then again, the goal of the EU isn't really to expand in my eyes.
“Do not lose time on daily trivialities. Do not dwell on petty detail. For all of these things melt away and drift apart within the obscure traffic of time. Live well and live broadly. You are alive and living now. Now is the envy of all of the dead.” ~ Emily3, World of Tomorrow
Words to live by.
Yes. Even as a person rooting for full Ukrainian victory and admission of my city into EU, I'll be the first to say no cheating. Ukraine needs to actually fulfill all criteria. Luckily Europeans can give advice on how to, and (I hope) this time Ukrainians are willing to do the work required for that.
I member one of the main issues preventing acceptance in EU was Ukraine rampant corruption.
Sometimes, the light of the moon is a key to other spaces. I've found a place where, for a night or two, the streets curve in unfamiliar ways. If I walk here, I might find insight, or I might be touched by madness.
"If you are ever asking yourself 'Is Trump lying or is he stupid?', the answer is most likely C: All of the Above" - Seth Meyers
Yeah, but right now Macron is not doing the meme any favors. Macron is a diplomat, who seems to be struggling to come to terms with the idea that there is no longer a diplomatic solution in Ukraine. His attempts to negotiate Putin seemed like the responsible thing to do at the time, but it looking increasingly naive in retrospect. France is yet to provide substantial military support to Ukraine, despite the vast majority of its allies already doing so. French caution doesn't look like much of a virtue, as it becomes increasingly clear that now is in fact the right time to take risks, and that diplomacy is not a feasible solution.
It is a very well known and ubiquitous phrase but if that is how you NEED to frame it...
Remember that ship that the Ukrainians sunk? The amphibious landing vessel? Yeah it supposedly took them many many attempts to hit that with a missile(probably tocha-u).
That missile is 5x faster than the harpoons. They are intercepting these things frequently AFAIK. I would not be surprised if we never hear about the harpoon missiles again. Maybe the only thing that will counter this is they are "map of the earth" type missiles so they *might* not see them coming.
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.
https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/rus...xaNQh4Ymoeyq7g
France has been sending military help since late february but we don't know the extent of that support because the French army has chosen not to communicate about that. France hasn't publicly disclosed any specifics. That doesn't mean they didn't provide anything substantial (we don't know if they provided anything substantial either, however).
Last edited by Barzotti; 2022-04-09 at 10:09 PM.
Last edited by Torched; 2022-04-09 at 10:06 PM.
“A man will contend for a false faith stronger than he will a true one,” he observes. “The truth defends itself, but a falsehood must be defended by its adherents: first to prove it to themselves and secondly, that they may appear right in the estimation of their friends.”
-The Acts of Pilate.
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.
What do you suggest the solution is aside from diplomacy? without a diplomatic compromise we are talking about years of fighting maybe it will go down to a not so hot war but it will never end while people continue to flee the country. We may all be gleeful at Russia's failure but Ukraine has lost 10 million people and rising those refugees may not come back that's talent and population you can't just replace not to mention the destruction year long fighting would cause.
- - - Updated - - -
That's not even going into how vital the French resistance was in WWII not to mention saving hundreds of thousands if not millions of Jews by sabotaging Hitler's concentration camp system. France's role in WWII has always been underappreciated because of their surrender but students of history know otherwise.
When Russia "agrees" to a ceasefire and then immediately starts blowing civilians up again, it should be fairly evident that "diplomatic" solutions aren't exactly feasible.
Ukraine has drawn their line in the sand, which appears to be "Russia, fuck off back to Russia," and they so far seem willing to fight for that line. Telling them "no no no, you should give Russia what it wants, maybe disarm... you know, to save yourselves!" when Russia has proven they are bad actors whose word is worth dirt only means giving Russia more time to prepare to invade Ukraine again, likely with a far more aggressively destructive and well-trained force.
This period, right now, is as unprepared for conducting an invasion as Russia is going to be. They had no real time to pivot their economy away from sanctions and they seem to have hit them as quite a surprise. Their foundering economy coupled with having to utilize old, dilapidated technology with a wholly disorganized military that they have to constantly keep applying pressure with or else risk the whole invasion attempt collapsing means they have no time to address any of these issues internally.
Give Russia a time to recuperate and they'll use it only to modernize their equipment, plan better supply lines, train soldiers and, pivot their economy away from international dependencies and formalize economic allegiances so that their next invasion is that much more rapid, brutal, and deadly.
It seems fairly clear that Russia will invade again unless they physically can't, either because sanctions have rotted their country or because Ukraine has secured military allegiances with some powerful friends. Anything beyond those two things happening, even with some sort of "Russian peace agreement" not worth the paper it's written on, and we'll just be hearing about more blown up train stations, dead civilians and mass graves in five years.
Last edited by Kaleredar; 2022-04-09 at 10:51 PM.
“Do not lose time on daily trivialities. Do not dwell on petty detail. For all of these things melt away and drift apart within the obscure traffic of time. Live well and live broadly. You are alive and living now. Now is the envy of all of the dead.” ~ Emily3, World of Tomorrow
Words to live by.
The speed of the harpoons isn't quite as much as an issue as they are sea-skimmers (like about a metre above sea level), making them harder to spot and target.
The UK has also said they will be sending 120 armoured vehicles. BoJo may be a clown but he has been very supportive of Ukraine.
- - - Updated - - -
S&P downgrades Russia's rating, making default likely. The first time since 1917.
https://www.bbc.com/news/live/world-...ost_type=share