Kremlin spokesman Dmitri Peskov:
“If Ukraine continues its provocations by attacking Russian cities, Russia will be forced to declare war against Ukraine”.
You cant make this shit up.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitri Peskov:
“If Ukraine continues its provocations by attacking Russian cities, Russia will be forced to declare war against Ukraine”.
You cant make this shit up.
On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.
- H. L. Mencken
There's actually a difference between "special operations" and "war", the latter of which will enable Russia to hold onto conscripts longer, and have a bigger pool of men to draw fresh meat from the grinder back home.
In my own (uneducated) opinion, this is a toothless snarl. Flooding your frontlines with unwilling, poorly trained soldiers is going to backfire even more than their engagements put together so far.
"It's 2013 and I still view the internet on a 560x192 resolution monitor!"
Right now they don't consider themselves at war, in other words, can't send in conscripts and can't mobilize. (nor technically use nukes but let's keep them out of this.) We know they've already sent conscripts but apparently that wasn't exactly what was intended.
At least, that's my understanding of the situation. Besides if they declare war on Ukraine AFTER Ukraine provokes them they can claim to fight a defensive war. (which NO ONE will believe but it looks good for the homefront.)
To be fair, 'missile' covers an extremely broad range when it comes to power of ordinance. A single Neptune weighs roughly a ton, and is significantly larger than a person. You're practically throwing two small cars full of military explosives at subsonic speeds at the ship, it's really not possible to stop that with armor. You're supposed to intercept those kind of missiles before they hit, and the Russians had multiple layers of defenses designed to do so that all got distracted by a drone.
Realistically, this is less a story about Russian failure and more one about Ukrainian success. The Neptunes were designed by Ukraine after 2014 and this is really the first actual significant use of them. Hitting a hostile target at long range through defenses with a new weapon system is not an easy operation, but if you're capable of doing it there aren't a lot of warships out on the seas in any navy that could just take that kind of hits.
Must...fight...urge...to...nitpick...
No, your point is well taken. Ship armor can't realistically expect to withstand that kind of direct hit. @Skroe and others have points out those deliriously deadly R2D2 guns on battleships so their armor doesn't have to take the hit. Battleships are floating cities, but the important word is "floating" and armor is heavy shit.
Well, it would be credible for any other military.
However, this is Russia and it was mild weather:
https://www.npr.org/2022/04/15/10930...p-sunk-ukraine
Thus the official Russian explanation is that they accidentally blew up the ship, and in the mild weather a mysteriously storm was summoned sinking it.
Holy shit, it was Neptune! I didn't know the name was so literal!
Uhhhh. Just read an interview with a journalist and a writer that worked in Russia for decades about how Russians actually function under all that propaganda, and it was a hard read. They are basically hard coded to obey their superiors and think that their country is de best. Or how they not know about WW2 western front, thinking it was Red Army alone that defeated Hitler. And that they have a long history of cruelty spanning back to being fucked by Mongols 800y ago. Their military is probably the last one that uses reconnaissance by fire, which means they sacrifice a small force of soldiers to see where the enemy sits (instead of like, sending a drone). Or how soldier wives were all giddy, because their husbands will bring them clothing taken from dead Ukrainians. We were all told not to hate your random Ivan and I was always strongly against shitting on entire nations, but I think it's time to change some views.
The highlight of the interview was this: the journalist one time asked a young Russian man that lived in the middle of nowhere in Kamchatka: "Wouldn't you prefer to live in a nice and rich Switzerland"?, and his response was "What? In such a tiny country?"
Sometimes, the light of the moon is a key to other spaces. I've found a place where, for a night or two, the streets curve in unfamiliar ways. If I walk here, I might find insight, or I might be touched by madness.
Their media seems to be in a bit of a twist about that.
https://www.reddit.com/r/ukraine/com...ir_main_state/
Like, they are calling that sinking Moskva is now a war.
War against what? Ships that spontaneously combust, which appears to be Kremlin's stance on the issue, and totally not Ukraine?