
Originally Posted by
bledgor
Have to strongly disagree about this being more like the books, it might have pulled different elements from the books, but that is it, it pulled names and people but they weren't anywhere close to the same character as they were in the books. None of the name characters acted basically anything like they were in the games/books (minus Atriox).
While yes in the start we didn't know exactly what they want, by the end of Harvest we basically understood they were trying to literally wipe humanity out. After a few years humanity knew they were facing genocide if they lost, much less decades in when Reach falls/Halo is discovered.
Halsey may be manipulative in the games/books, but she is a lot more gray/do whatever it takes to save the human species than the laughable evil she is in the show, not to mention she acts so stupid in the show, which is not even close to how she is.
The insurrection plot could have worked pre-covenant or early covenant years, but Reach falls roughly 25 years into the war. The plot of the show is already pushing us towards the Halo rings/reach being discovered which means we should be decades into the war, at that point it wasn't my insurrection/my UNSC, it was all humans banding together to fight off literal extinction. That is exacerbated by the fact the show has barely shown the covenant to be a threat in the show, you would think they are an equal foe that humanity is holding off rather than an unstoppable force we can barely beat when outnumbering them overwhelmingly (what is it recommended 3 to 1 or 6 to 1 odds?)
Halo never had to sex gimmick because that wasn't what it was about, it was about the action, the fight to survive, fending off extinction. Add in some spice of horror with the flood and you have all you need. Injecting it in is solely because the writers want to add something that isn't really there, much less there for the main character (I fucking hate the man child they made John Cheeks, he is nothing like Master Chief).
The whole emotion chip gimmick was stupid way to make drama out of nothing, would have 1000% preferred they delved into the fact the Spartan were basically emotionally crippled by training/indoctrination from the time they were 6, much like in Halo 4, where you have conversations about how Cortana acts more human than John who acts more like a machine 99% of the time.
Johnson was a badass and removing him is dumb as fuck, Keyes isn't near as badass in the show to come close, and is even too timid to be game/book Keyes.
Yes you can serve the enemy, if there objective is to conquer, not when there literal objective is the extinction of your race because you are a threat to everything they believe, and a direct threat to the hierarchy/leadership. Humans are blasphemy to the core tenants of the covenant, I could have stomached them keeping her an actual PoW/slave that is treated like shit but kept around because of the human/for-runner stuff, but not treated like it was in the show. Have you read the books?
I am not saying they copied ME, but I can see the parallels easily enough because quite a few aspects of the show (aka the drama/relationships) are closer to ME than Halo, though I think it is because the writers have no clue what makes Halo, Halo, and went for more a sci fi drama rather than an action sci fi show.
I am also so tired of this bullshit deflection that fans want a shot for shot retelling of a game/book, they don't. What they want is something faithful/close, more a 80-90% accurate depiction and right now Hollywood keeps giving us something that is maybe 40, 45%. The modern writers are overwhelmingly proving they don't have the talent to go off script so to speak of adaptations, because so much of modern adaptations have been utter garbage (see Halo show, Wheel of Time, Game of Thrones once they got past what is written, etc)>