Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst
1
2
  1. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by Vitinariy View Post
    I kinda agree. I you look at raider.io, current cutoff rating for EU is over 2.8k. Even a top prot warrior on my realm is not reaching that rating. I think it would be way more fair to have cutoffs by class instead of flat out rating. That would allow people to play what they want while still rewarding them for playing what they want well.
    What? So maybe the prot warriors on your REALM needs to git gud?
    There's plenty off prot warriors above 2.8k. Highest rated prot warrior is 2996 rating...

    So prot warriors will be rewarded for playing well, just as any other class will?
    What are you even on about? You have all tanks at or above 3k, literally, all of them.

  2. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by FelPlague View Post
    TBC? you mean vanilla (Grand marshal and... whatever it was warlord, worked rather similiar)
    Well, grand marshal and high warlord worked a bit differently iirc. Only one guy per week got that title. Competition was either vicious or people account shared and win traded until everyone in the circle got it. Glad was always the top percent or top part of a percent.

  3. #23
    I honestly think they should make several rewards.
    Have 1%, 3% and 5%, would still be prestigious AF to get it but still attainable for good players without insane time commitment.

  4. #24
    The Insane Glorious Leader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    In my bunker leading uprisings
    Posts
    18,657
    Quote Originally Posted by Clawsout View Post
    Honestly just adding bullshit for the 1% is such a fucking waste of resources
    it is and really only serves to further segregate the population which dwindling as it is is probably not a good idea.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by AlmightyGerkin View Post
    I agree it's a title who cares. Not like people have 50 to choose from. Reinforces the fact people bitch about anything.
    Its true. They just overwhelmingly opted out of doing pvp but for the epics you could get in BC. A collective shrug on the part of the playerbase as a whole
    The hammer comes down:
    Quote Originally Posted by Osmeric View Post
    Normal should be reduced in difficulty. Heroic should be reduced in difficulty.
    And the tiny fraction for whom heroic raids are currently well tuned? Too bad,so sad! With the arterial bleed of subs the fastest it's ever been, the vanity development that gives you guys your own content is no longer supportable.

  5. #25
    Quick everyone: level a couple dozen alts to 60 and run a single m+ to make more spots for title

  6. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by Twdft View Post
    Quick everyone: level a couple dozen alts to 60 and run a single m+ to make more spots for title
    Just need a thousand fresh sixties to create another title!

  7. #27
    Imagine doing more than a random title for the top 0.1

    DURRR BUT PVPPPPPPPPP


    Ye but nobody cares about pvp, 80% of players do M+ so....


    Imagine bringing back the WoD CM Achiv Bronze Title Silver Mount and Gold Xmog and maybe add for the sake of competition or whatever the extra title for the "best timed Plaguefall on server" like we had in MoP




    No just 1 title for the 0.1% lul


    ////////



    No offense but people saying that PVP always had a 0.1% Title are dumb as fuck

    PvP has 0.1% title then the usual Duelist Challenger Rival Gladiator title which M+ doesnt have any equivalent, and also comparing the 2 is bonkers.



    M+ should ALWAYS HAVE THIS REWARD STRUCTURE


    Gold - Xmog
    Silver - Mount
    Bronze - Title


    Then you can add a Plat reward for the top 0.1% just like Notorius Glad is atm.
    Last edited by Dioporco; 2022-01-06 at 10:14 AM.

  8. #28
    Quote Originally Posted by paxen View Post
    Just need a thousand fresh sixties to create another title!
    If every account had 1000 chars of which 999 did a single +2 and the last char any higher dungeon then everyone would get the title :-)

  9. #29
    Light comes from darkness shise's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    6,484
    Why don´t they stop developing M+ already and focus on quality developments in the game instead?

    SO sick of lazy, recycled content.

  10. #30
    Quote Originally Posted by shise View Post
    Why don´t they stop developing M+ already and focus on quality developments in the game instead?
    M+ is really cheap, when talking about dev resources, compared to raids. What's more, the M+ creates a layer of longevity to one of the most fun parts of wow, five man dungeons*.

    If anything they should use more resources on M+, not less.

    *Yes, I know many people disagree that 5-mans are the best part, but guess what? A lot of other people do agree, and it's just common sense for blizz to spend some resources on us as well.

  11. #31
    Quote Originally Posted by Clawsout View Post
    Honestly just adding bullshit for the 1% is such a fucking waste of resources
    Get Good Bro and stop complaining, you want a medal just for participating too

  12. #32
    Quote Originally Posted by Daan View Post
    They should reward the best 0.1% of each spec and not only the meta slaves. Feral is so bad in M+ that they don't even win the Razzie Award.
    Yeah, my thoughts were the same if you look at the top players, it's just select few specs over and over.
    Quote Originally Posted by munkeyinorbit View Post
    Blizzard do what the players want all the time.

  13. #33
    Quote Originally Posted by tomten View Post
    What? So maybe the prot warriors on your REALM needs to git gud?
    There's plenty off prot warriors above 2.8k. Highest rated prot warrior is 2996 rating...

    So prot warriors will be rewarded for playing well, just as any other class will?
    What are you even on about? You have all tanks at or above 3k, literally, all of them.
    Are you ok? You call 16 people in the world PLENTY? Maybe get a reality check bro?
    Compare that with:
    - 48 DKs
    - 64 VDHs
    - 198 Guardian Druids
    - 132 Prot pallys
    - 64 BRMs

    Also, "git gud" arguments are completely childish....

  14. #34
    Quote Originally Posted by Vitinariy View Post
    Are you ok? You call 16 people in the world PLENTY? Maybe get a reality check bro?
    Compare that with:
    - 48 DKs
    - 64 VDHs
    - 198 Guardian Druids
    - 132 Prot pallys
    - 64 BRMs

    Also, "git gud" arguments are completely childish....
    Yes, people gravitate to and from meta? Soon prot pala will take over because its best by far. Guardian is just far easier to play and slightly better just below the very highest keys.
    What is your point? If there was no prot warriors doing the highest content you'd have a point.
    If you'd look at last season the numbers would be completely different? Doesn't mean any of them isn't viable? People just take the path of least resistance...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •