Would u like a 2h Enhanc shaman?

[Kithelle]

No thanks...it was never any good, literally the only use it had was hoping you got lucky and hit the jackpot of WF procs in pvp and the spec revolves around dual wielding now. You'd have to practically revamp the spec just to make 2H work, I'd rather they improve the spec rather than spend a big chunk of time revamping the spec for a niche playstyle

[Twistnectar]

I think too many people are focused on the "it wasn't any good back then", instead of what it could be. Now if somehow (it won't be) it were even in DPS with dual wield, then yes I would love 2H back if not only for aesthetics alone. I think the option would be nice, maybe it would be the pvp go to and DW the PvE go to? Either way, I don't care about WF one shotting fools. I just love the look of a massive 2H weapon, and I love the shaman class. MAKE IT SO!

[Unholyground]

Just as a counter to people worried about weapon types and stats they can easily add the hidden stats on all weapons so everything that a sharman could use would have agility when they use it.

[Neverafter]

2h Enhance. Sure.

I would take it even further. With the way stats scale and everything now, I feel like any class should be able to 2h or dual-wield any weapon. Similar to how monks can DW or 2H, and now Frost Dk's, I think it should apply to almost every class. Rogues should remain DW, 2H doesn't make sense. I would like to see 2H DH. I wish Survival Hunters could DW (I also wish Beastmaster was the melee spec, but thats for another thread). I remember Unholy DK being fun to DW back in the day.

Warriors and Paladins are a bit trickier also. Arms and Fury already fill the desire to use 2H or DW weapons for the most part. Retribution Paladins would feel awkward DW after so long being exclusive to 2H. Then again, it might be cool to see a Ret Pally DW swords, filled with light. Again, doesn't mean that DW Ret Pally should be the best option, but if someone wants to play that style, they should at least be able to do queable content (LFD, LFR, solo PVP, etc)

[Aleksej89]

Visually? Hell yes.
Would be very awesome to have 2hander axes/maces back, they looked much cooler than dual wield for shamans.

In terms of game mechanics?
The 2handed agility melee weapons already feel awkward, not sure how would they even work for enhancement.

[Aydinx2]

2h Enhance. Sure.

I would take it even further. With the way stats scale and everything now, I feel like any class should be able to 2h or dual-wield any weapon. Similar to how monks can DW or 2H, and now Frost Dk's, I think it should apply to almost every class. Rogues should remain DW, 2H doesn't make sense. I would like to see 2H DH. I wish Survival Hunters could DW (I also wish Beastmaster was the melee spec, but thats for another thread). I remember Unholy DK being fun to DW back in the day.

Warriors and Paladins are a bit trickier also. Arms and Fury already fill the desire to use 2H or DW weapons for the most part. Retribution Paladins would feel awkward DW after so long being exclusive to 2H. Then again, it might be cool to see a Ret Pally DW swords, filled with light. Again, doesn't mean that DW Ret Pally should be the best option, but if someone wants to play that style, they should at least be able to do queable content (LFD, LFR, solo PVP, etc)

There could easily be 2H Glaives, like the one from Star Trek.
The issue is that balancing is kinda hard because DW gives you an extra enchant and any effect that benefits from auto-attacking makes it the best option.

[cocomen2]

Just allow Shamans to wield spear, its not some high tech that primal shamans can't understand how to use it, just image tribal Troll Shaman that can't wield a SPEAR, damn even Tauren theme that just copypasted native-americans style, hard to image that Tauren Shaman can't wield Spear too.

[gulatar]

omg after all those years still same discussion...