Last edited by Eugenik; 2022-04-27 at 05:09 AM.
Let's look at the test results. You are a horrible person. It says right here, you're a horrible person. We weren't even testing that. Don't let the horrible person thing get you down though. Science justified your parents choice to abandon you.
He aggressively closed some cabinets after his mom died. And tried to run away and hide in bathrooms when his bipolar girlfriend tried to manipulate and hit him. Wooow he's so abusive.
The psychiatrist has tested her as a 98th percentile lier and exaggerator. Shes an orange parser in being a manipulative and lying bitch. And you still support her. Sad.
Last edited by GreenJesus; 2022-04-27 at 05:23 AM.
I don't believe Johnny Depp, the evidence shows he is a manipulator, especially the fact he has put fourth mostly evidence from those he can and does manipulate, He is Not a domestic violence victim, he's an actor and non of his testimony comes across authentic or objectively believable.
- - - Updated - - -
Psychiatrist can be paid,
As for his performance, and the fact there are those who like Johnny Depp already willing to believe him regardless to an entire trial of evidence not completed.
I am going with the U.K Ruling as for defamation he has not proven his case, he is just rehashing a trial and verdict he already lost. He's using his celebrity status to get revenge.
As for Amber nothing I have stated suggest what I think of her or any claim she is a nice person, I believe they were both in a volatile relationship and she was the victim by an aging actor who should have known better and left his wife. It would have been better to move on or sue or appeal the court where he was convicted.
#ANTIFA "Intellect alone is useless in a fight...you can't even break a rule, how can you be expected to break bone" Khan Singh
The point which I almost quoted word for word.
But instead of saying "Implying that Depp did do shit to her AGAIN" I wanted to say: "Once more, implying that Depp did do shit to her after all"
It's not "by chance" that she became a public figure in that regard 2 years ago.
It's because she claimed Depp was violent towards her. Especially since she says, in that article, that when she spoke out at that time, she faced the wrath of the culture.
Since it is supposedly not true, it's defamation, as Depp lost several acting jobs due to this.
Last edited by KrayZ33; 2022-04-27 at 06:27 AM.
Let's look at the test results. You are a horrible person. It says right here, you're a horrible person. We weren't even testing that. Don't let the horrible person thing get you down though. Science justified your parents choice to abandon you.
Let's look at the test results. You are a horrible person. It says right here, you're a horrible person. We weren't even testing that. Don't let the horrible person thing get you down though. Science justified your parents choice to abandon you.
They both fucked up. They both did shitty things. The fact that OP is carrying water for Heard as strongly as he is, is just as cringe as all the people dog piling in Depp's corner.
I'm sorry guys but SOMETIMES DOMESTIC ABUSE CASES CAN BE THE FAULT OF BOTH PARTIES. And in this case that seems to be what it is. No clue why people are white knighting for either side.
My man, the case is about defamation. If you agree that hes abusive, then you agree with my OP, which states that I dont understand why people are defending Depp so rabidly in this case when hes clearly not been defamed.
Correcting the record, with evidence presented in court no less, is not "carrying water for Heard". Im correcting misconceptions, you just dont like it for some strange reason..
Let's look at the test results. You are a horrible person. It says right here, you're a horrible person. We weren't even testing that. Don't let the horrible person thing get you down though. Science justified your parents choice to abandon you.
It's that gang mentality shit I mentioned earlier about people picking a side and then personalizing everything. If someone believes either side, they distort all contrary facts and evidence until they can convince themselves they backed the right pony. Social media has trained everyone into believing the only thing worse than being a domestic abuser is being wrong on the internet, and as a result there is no such thing as honest debate anymore. Everything ALWAYS boils down to "no, you were wrong and that's why I get to treat you as a sub-human with no redeeming value." Not everyone does it, but bad faith posters always overwhelm and derail any kind of civil discussion to that end, and you can always tell who they are because they like to add "lol" to any disagreement like an idiot calling card.
Depp should get everything he asks for plus a cut of everything she ever gets for the rest of her life, though I hope she doesn't work in Hollywood for much longer.
- - - Updated - - -
Who? I haven't seen anyone say that. But then again, I don't watch or read celebrity gossip, except for when someone popular dies.
- - - Updated - - -
Depp was defamed by Heard, there is no way that anyone is defending her after the bullshit she has said. Even her own witnesses are saying she is lying.
He is getting defamed though. The cops that came to their home, when a call was made for an alleged assault, said they found no crime (no assault/abuse). The redness on Heard’s face, which she claimed was from being struck by Johnny, the cop (Officer Melissa Saenz) said looked to be from crying after she had closely examined Heard’s face - Saenz said there was no swelling, marks or injury.
And this is from a cop that said she had been to over 100 domestic violence calls and has been on the force for 12 years. She also said Heard was uncooperative (said nothing). When asked if Heard received a domestic violence packet from the cops, which is something the cops give to victims, the cops said they did not give one to Heard because they didn’t believe, nor identify her as being assaulted or a victim of domestic abuse.
Heards allegations against Johnny caused him to be dropped by Disney and shunned in Hollywood. He said he struggles to get work because of it. So, yeah, he has a case, especially when Heard is claiming she was assaulted, when there’s no police report of an assault happening. It’s only Heard’s word… which, if anyone has been watching the case, can say has not been credible.
Also, Depp’s failed 2020 libel suit against the UK newspaper The Sun, Saenz’s testimony was pretty much sidelined for the lack of notes and photos and assumptions about the cause of the state of Heard’s face.
Last edited by Winter Blossom; 2022-04-27 at 11:31 AM. Reason: Typos and added link
Fairy tales are more than true–not because they tell us dragons exist, but because they tell us dragons can be beaten. -G. K. Chesterton & Neil Gaiman
Lol imagine being a celebrity, taking the stand then proceeding to crack jokes to the laughter of the courtroom and court officials.
You guys are saying Heard is a textbook narcissist? Yeah, no wonder the two fell in love.
The most important part of the case, muffins.
Thats not the only allegation.. And since when did we start trusting the LAPD? Domestic abuse call and no notes or photos? Thats suspicious... the attending officer doesnt know who Johnny Depp is? No wonder that testimony was sidelined.
- - - Updated - - -
Im against the side that is a wife beater, crying defamation. The side you seem comfortable defending. I dont think Heard should win her counter suit.
Last edited by Eugenik; 2022-04-27 at 05:55 PM.
Let's look at the test results. You are a horrible person. It says right here, you're a horrible person. We weren't even testing that. Don't let the horrible person thing get you down though. Science justified your parents choice to abandon you.
Man, this reads like a game of sportsball with folks having their favorite home teams and shit. Why do we gotta pick sides? Can't we just watch this circus unfold and enjoy rich people being awful to each other?
Fairy tales are more than true–not because they tell us dragons exist, but because they tell us dragons can be beaten. -G. K. Chesterton & Neil Gaiman
It's morbid fun watching Millennials become their Boomer parents. Going all in on defense of their childhood nostalgia. "How dare someone besmirch Johnny Wayne Depp!
It's less fun seeing "Im very progressive" people unable apply lessons learned over the past few years. Because of nostalgia and/or cultish devotion to celebrity.
It's like the last 5 years of progressivism wasnt about understanding the policies and framework. But just a pop-culture phenomenon to distract them from their boredom.
Aaaand we're still weeks away from a ruling.