Johnny Depp's Defamation Suit

[KrayZ33]

Johnny Depp is an actor and the evidence so far doesn't support his claim of being a victim. Calling him a victim is like calling Ike Turner a victim because one time Tina fought back according to her in a limo.

She said Depp has hit her, police couldn't find any proof. They then (after the scandal went public) settled things out of court and she removed the request for a restraining order.

Everything was basically "fine"

Then 2 years later or so she wrote an article where she again said "she is a public figure representing domestic abuse.” Implying that Depp did do shit to her AGAIN.
Defamation fits quite well imho, since this caused issues again and she has no proof.
Or maybe she just shouldn't have taken the settlement then, which is kinda telling me that they "argued it out and it wasn't so bad".

The case is more about that article than anything else actually.

After that, she doubled down and called him "the Monster" and that he put her through broken glass and all that kind of shit, without any scars to show for.
Imho, she's obviously lying. The PTSD test thingy they did and the doc calling her out is kinda pointing that out as well.

At least that's how I understand the whole thing.

[Daymanmb]

Then 2 years later or so she wrote an article where she again said "she is a public figure representing domestic abuse.” Implying that Depp did do shit to her AGAIN.
Defamation fits quite well imho, since this caused issues again and she has no proof.

She never mentions Depp by name. Can you pick a point in the op-ed that implies Depp? The article is posted in the OP.

And to be clear, Heard was granted a temporary restraining order: https://www.theguardian.com/film/201...estic-violence

[Snowfunk]

Watched a couple of hours tonight.

Looking pretty good for Johnny.

Amber Turd really dug herself a deep hole....

[PACOX]

Heard's lawyers have been consistently garbage.

Shit.

Like the shit Heard took on the bed.

[Witchblade77]

She never mentions Depp by name. Can you pick a point in the op-ed that implies Depp? The article is posted in the OP.

And to be clear, Heard was granted a temporary restraining order: https://www.theguardian.com/film/201...estic-violence

in case you are laboring under misconception

1. you don't actualy have to prove your life is in danger to get a restraining order. you just say it is, ask for one and as long as your lawyer properly filed, you'll get it.
2. its a symbolic gesture at best that is all but impossible to enforce, which is why its so easy to get.

[Daymanmb]

in case you are laboring under misconception

1. you don't actualy have to prove your life is in danger to get a restraining order. you just say it is, ask for one and as long as your lawyer properly filed, you'll get it.
2. its a symbolic gesture at best that is all but impossible to enforce, which is why its so easy to get.

Thanks for answering questions no one asked lol

[Witchblade77]

Thanks for answering questions no one asked lol

you are trying to imply that the fact that she got a restraining order proves that he was abusive. I'm showing you that it proves absolutely NOTHING. so don't use it as a proof. Amber Heard however WAS arrested on charges of domestic violence. her ex claims it was misinterpreted, which you could take as gospel... until you remember that abused partners often defend their abusers for variety of reasons. its not a conclusive proof since charges were dropped. but its more of a proof than restraining order being granted. cause as I said.. to get a restraining order? all you have to do is ask the judge for it.

[Magical Mudcrab]

Johnny Depp is an actor and the evidence so far doesn't support his claim of being a victim. Calling him a victim is like calling Ike Turner a victim because one time Tina fought back according to her in a limo.

As for his so called history with ex's again he puts on a good act, but Ted Bundy was a Suicide Hotline volunteer and BTK worked in his Church neither of them broke a law and had people who would swear by them too.

The fact Depp is good looking or is nice to kids doesn't change anything. He was an abusive drug addict, in a relationship with an abused woman half his age. Both I am sure are no angels.

Your statements come off as someone who is trying to justify domestic violence against men. The fact of the matter is that the evidence shown has demonstrated that Heard has assaulted Depp on multiple occasions, testimony from expert witnesses have shown that Heard has lied about having PTSD and other psychological effects she claimed resulted from their relationship, and previous partners from both individuals have come forward to attest to the fact that Depp does not have a history of domestic abuse, while Heard not only has a record of it, she has been arrested for it. What's worse is the seeming attempt to cast him as the de facto abuser because of his addictions, when people facing addiction are one of the most vulnerable people in society because of stigma against them and leads to heavy underreporting of rape and abuse because of the kneejerk reaction to disbelieve them.

While I'm open to this just being a misinterpretation, it seems as though personal prejudices are heavily skewing your opinion here. It's fine to not believe Depp, or even to call out the resulting wave of misogyny that will likely follow if Heard is found to have made unfounded statements, but it's not fine to characterize it in the way you did.

[Ihavewaffles]

Ouch, looks like amber got diagnosed to be a crazy nutjob, would explain her history of abuse..

[Daymanmb]

you are trying to imply that the fact that she got a restraining order proves that he was abusive.

Lol no Im not. Im stating a fact. Youre inferring the rest..

[GreenJesus]

Johnny Depp is an actor and the evidence so far doesn't support his claim of being a victim. Calling him a victim is like calling Ike Turner a victim because one time Tina fought back according to her in a limo.

As for his so called history with ex's again he puts on a good act, but Ted Bundy was a Suicide Hotline volunteer and BTK worked in his Church neither of them broke a law and had people who would swear by them too.

The fact Depp is good looking or is nice to kids doesn't change anything. He was an abusive drug addict, in a relationship with an abused woman half his age. Both I am sure are no angels.

He aggressively closed some cabinets after his mom died. And tried to run away and hide in bathrooms when his bipolar girlfriend tried to manipulate and hit him. Wooow he's so abusive.

The psychiatrist has tested her as a 98th percentile lier and exaggerator. Shes an orange parser in being a manipulative and lying bitch. And you still support her. Sad.

[Doctor Amadeus]

Your statements come off as someone who is trying to justify domestic violence against men. The fact of the matter is that the evidence shown has demonstrated that Heard has assaulted Depp on multiple occasions, testimony from expert witnesses have shown that Heard has lied about having PTSD and other psychological effects she claimed resulted from their relationship, and previous partners from both individuals have come forward to attest to the fact that Depp does not have a history of domestic abuse, while Heard not only has a record of it, she has been arrested for it. What's worse is the seeming attempt to cast him as the de facto abuser because of his addictions, when people facing addiction are one of the most vulnerable people in society because of stigma against them and leads to heavy underreporting of rape and abuse because of the kneejerk reaction to disbelieve them.

While I'm open to this just being a misinterpretation, it seems as though personal prejudices are heavily skewing your opinion here. It's fine to not believe Depp, or even to call out the resulting wave of misogyny that will likely follow if Heard is found to have made unfounded statements, but it's not fine to characterize it in the way you did.

I don't believe Johnny Depp, the evidence shows he is a manipulator, especially the fact he has put fourth mostly evidence from those he can and does manipulate, He is Not a domestic violence victim, he's an actor and non of his testimony comes across authentic or objectively believable.

- - - Updated - - -

He aggressively closed some cabinets after his mom died. And tried to run away and hide in bathrooms when his bipolar girlfriend tried to manipulate and hit him. Wooow he's so abusive.

The psychiatrist has tested her as a 98th percentile lier and exaggerator. Shes an orange parser in being a manipulative and lying bitch. And you still support her. Sad.

Psychiatrist can be paid,

As for his performance, and the fact there are those who like Johnny Depp already willing to believe him regardless to an entire trial of evidence not completed.

I am going with the U.K Ruling as for defamation he has not proven his case, he is just rehashing a trial and verdict he already lost. He's using his celebrity status to get revenge.


As for Amber nothing I have stated suggest what I think of her or any claim she is a nice person, I believe they were both in a volatile relationship and she was the victim by an aging actor who should have known better and left his wife. It would have been better to move on or sue or appeal the court where he was convicted.

[KrayZ33]

She never mentions Depp by name. Can you pick a point in the op-ed that implies Depp? The article is posted in the OP.

The point which I almost quoted word for word.
But instead of saying "Implying that Depp did do shit to her AGAIN" I wanted to say: "Once more, implying that Depp did do shit to her after all"


It's not "by chance" that she became a public figure in that regard 2 years ago.
It's because she claimed Depp was violent towards her. Especially since she says, in that article, that when she spoke out at that time, she faced the wrath of the culture.

Since it is supposedly not true, it's defamation, as Depp lost several acting jobs due to this.

[Daymanmb]

He aggressively closed some cabinets after his mom died.

That video was months before his mom died. Youre parroting talking points.

- - - Updated - - -

appeal the court where he was convicted.

I believe he tried that and was basically laughed out of court.

[Aurrora]

I believe he tried that and was basically laughed out of court.

The UK appeal system is retarded, you appeal to the judge that ruled on your case in the first place and he decides if the case should be looked at by another.

[Daymanmb]

The UK appeal system is retarded, you appeal to the judge that ruled on your case in the first place and he decides if the case should be looked at by another.

Apparently everything about the UK system is broken when it goes against Depp.

[Cthulhu 2020]

They both fucked up. They both did shitty things. The fact that OP is carrying water for Heard as strongly as he is, is just as cringe as all the people dog piling in Depp's corner.

I'm sorry guys but SOMETIMES DOMESTIC ABUSE CASES CAN BE THE FAULT OF BOTH PARTIES. And in this case that seems to be what it is. No clue why people are white knighting for either side.

[Daymanmb]

They both fucked up. They both did shitty things. The fact that OP is carrying water for Heard as strongly as he is, is just as cringe as all the people dog piling in Depp's corner.

I'm sorry guys but SOMETIMES DOMESTIC ABUSE CASES CAN BE THE FAULT OF BOTH PARTIES. And in this case that seems to be what it is. No clue why people are white knighting for either side.

My man, the case is about defamation. If you agree that hes abusive, then you agree with my OP, which states that I dont understand why people are defending Depp so rabidly in this case when hes clearly not been defamed.

Correcting the record, with evidence presented in court no less, is not "carrying water for Heard". Im correcting misconceptions, you just dont like it for some strange reason..

[Nastard]

No clue why people are white knighting for either side.

It's that gang mentality shit I mentioned earlier about people picking a side and then personalizing everything. If someone believes either side, they distort all contrary facts and evidence until they can convince themselves they backed the right pony. Social media has trained everyone into believing the only thing worse than being a domestic abuser is being wrong on the internet, and as a result there is no such thing as honest debate anymore. Everything ALWAYS boils down to "no, you were wrong and that's why I get to treat you as a sub-human with no redeeming value." Not everyone does it, but bad faith posters always overwhelm and derail any kind of civil discussion to that end, and you can always tell who they are because they like to add "lol" to any disagreement like an idiot calling card.

[postman1782]

- Admits to hitting him on tape
- Shits on his bed
- Throws a alcohol bottle at him, severing his finger
- Records him at his lowest, then laughs and smiles at the end when he finds out.
- Therapist admits she instigates fights

There’s a lot… and I think she’s a textbook narcissist. Hope Johnny can clear his name.

Depp should get everything he asks for plus a cut of everything she ever gets for the rest of her life, though I hope she doesn't work in Hollywood for much longer.

- - - Updated - - -

the most absurd part is they say this part is in fact Depp's fault. he was the abusive one for having a bottle thrown at him. like, this is how the media portrayed that.

Who? I haven't seen anyone say that. But then again, I don't watch or read celebrity gossip, except for when someone popular dies.

- - - Updated - - -

Brocialists coming out of the woodwork to defend Johnny Depp... stay golden.


Woke solidarity with the abusive patriarchy.

Depp was defamed by Heard, there is no way that anyone is defending her after the bullshit she has said. Even her own witnesses are saying she is lying.