Elon Musk Buys Twitter

[Cthulhu 2020]

Twitter Files Part 4: Nothingburger boogaloo

Twitter Files 4 is one giant jumbled mess, but basically it shows us the inner workings of Twitter around Jan 3-8. It gives one big ole timeline of conversations that went on between Twitter executives, as well as various arms of government encouraging them to ban Trump.

Oddly enough, despite this being about the process for which Trump got banned on Jan 7, it CONVENIENTLY NEVER DISCUSSES WHAT HAPPENED ON JAN 6.

This is what controlling the narrative looks like folks. It was never about free speech.

- - - Updated - - -

Er, you're slurping a lot of that conspiracy theory bullshit, aren't ya... I bet you were one of the irrational Elon fans just three years ago. I'll trust the information on Wikipedia more than some random bullshit coming from you, if it's all the same to you.

Even if he allegedly made every single cent on his own, it's still a bad look that you worship everything he does just because he made it. If anything, we know from every example out there that the people who make the most money often break the most laws and the most morals. They stop on everyone else's hands and heads. They're often fraudsters, using money to silence dissent.

Billionaire worship ain't a good look my dude. Especially when it's narcissists like Trump and Elmo.

[Slant]

Even if he allegedly made every single cent on his own, it's still a bad look that you worship everything he does just because he made it. If anything, we know from every example out there that the people who make the most money often break the most laws and the most morals. They stop on everyone else's hands and heads. They're often fraudsters, using money to silence dissent.

Billionaire worship ain't a good look my dude. Especially when it's narcissists like Trump and Elmo.

Literally, all I said was that he didn't get born with money in his ass like Trump did, so Draconis' comparison isn't accurate.

THAT IS LITERALLY ALL I SAID.

Now for some reason you rage so blindly about me worshipping Elon Musk. And then you proceed to start ranting about how the rich break laws, because they're rich. Argh! Ooaaaah!. You're so angry, which is funny, because all I said was literally the comparison doesn't hold up.

It still doesn't. Which you have failed to refute successfully, so you somehow veer off into attacking my agenda, which is funny, because I detest the pothead and think he's just a dude that won the dotcom lottery, is all. Like he really lucked out, he didn't actually work hard for his money. But him lucking out in the dotcom bubble is probably the primary reason why he's a billionaire today, not whatever conspiracy theory it is you've clearly subscribed to.

[diller]

My entire timeline is being flooded with political posts now - in which it's a bunch of MAGA hat profile picture people throwing hate and vitriol at anything they perceive as being "left".

Your timeline only shows what you are interested in so that is odd, I see nothing political at all in my timeline because I don't follow anyone in politics.

- - - Updated - - -

I mean, paying to be verified=free speech? Eh? Not being censored=free speech to me. Bizzare reply, but not surprising.

You do realize he's actively banning people that he doesn't agree with so how is that free speech?

[Rennadrel]

Your timeline only shows what you are interested in so that is odd, I see nothing political at all in my timeline because I don't follow anyone in politics.

Same. And even the trending topics have a lot more diverse topics being discussed now than they used to, as it was proven that Twitter admins were forcing political discussions as the trends rather than what people really want to talk about which is stuff like entertainment, video games, etc. Even the few people who I follow that do talk politics stuff from time to time, I don't see any of this claimed garbage. Always a pro tip is to have your feed set to showing Latest Tweets instead of Top Tweets, because that is where you find all the bullshit.

[Cthulhu 2020]

Your timeline only shows what you are interested in so that is odd, I see nothing political at all in my timeline because I don't follow anyone in politics.

https://twitter.com/davidhogg111/sta...11865242492928

This post with 70k likes points out that someone who has no right wing interests is being forced to view right wing dogma and propaganda in their timeline, and has tons of replies echoing the same sentiment. Earlier in this thread I posted an image about how left wing pundits are stagnating on followers, if not losing them, while right wing pundits are exploding.

Twitter has the power to feature/suppress different people and topics. With Musk going on Twitter live to say that he believed the 2020 election was stolen because Twitter unfairly put their finger on the scales for Democrats and vowing to put his finger on the scales for Republicans, do people really think it's that far of a stretch that Musk is giving right wing politics more exposure and suppressing the other side? My non political twitter account is about 3/4 normal stuff but 1/4 right wing BS. And many are noticing this trend.

- - - Updated - - -

Literally, all I said was that he didn't get born with money in his ass like Trump did, so Draconis' comparison isn't accurate.

THAT IS LITERALLY ALL I SAID.

Now for some reason you rage so blindly about me worshipping Elon Musk. And then you proceed to start ranting about how the rich break laws, because they're rich. Argh! Ooaaaah!. You're so angry, which is funny, because all I said was literally the comparison doesn't hold up.

It still doesn't. Which you have failed to refute successfully, so you somehow veer off into attacking my agenda, which is funny, because I detest the pothead and think he's just a dude that won the dotcom lottery, is all. Like he really lucked out, he didn't actually work hard for his money. But him lucking out in the dotcom bubble is probably the primary reason why he's a billionaire today, not whatever conspiracy theory it is you've clearly subscribed to.

"LUL UR MAD". Grow up dude. We're having a discussion on the internet. The only source of information on how much cash Musk got from his father is Musk himself, so I choose to take that $20k figure with a huge grain of salt. He's been suing people and paying media companies to push and preserve this image of a self made billionaire. But he's far more like Trump than you seem to want to admit. He's not done much of anything on his own in his life. He wasn't a Tesla founder, but when he kicked the actual Tesla founders out, he sued to call himself the founder.

This twitter debacle shows that he's a manchild with thin skin. One only needs to look back a few pages to see his tantrums banning people for making fun of him, even when they followed the rules. He's a petulant child.

And most indicting of all, his claim that this was about freedom of speech is pure BS. He's doing this to control the narrative. I'd say the fortunate part is that he's been transparent about that. But despite his clear admission of malfeasance in regards to the future of Twitter, his fans continue to insist it was some noble act for free speech.

[BigToast]

It's sad that this thread is basically a "bash elon thread" when he is literally doing more to try protect free speech than anyone has in the past, I dunno, yonks years. I will say though, that he did say he would unban every account that didn't violate country laws but he hasn't yet done so. When he does that, I will be happy.

People who use "literally" this poorly are literally the worst people in the world. And that's not hyperbole.

[Draco-Onis]

20000 bucks ain't really anything... but sure, guess he got a loaded daddy that made him a billionaire with 20000 bucks.

Are you seriously going to argue that having powerful parents with unlimited connections and ressources don't greatly increase the odds of becoming a billionaire?

[Forogil]

The spiral continues...

Stop feeding the troll!

[arandomuser]

The spiral continues...

so their problem with fauci is he supported lockdowns and mask mandates? yet.. lockdowns were literally exluslively state decisions he just provided the scientific data to support those.. so like what is their problem exactly? also if lockdowns and mask mandates WERE federal policy.. does he know during the pandemic the head of the executive branch was....donald trump?

so to be accurate shouldnt the tweet be " prosecute governors who had their states health departments institute temporary lockdowns and mask mandates that slightly inconvienced my life for a bit over a year"

[Poopymonster]

so their problem with fauci is he supported lockdowns and mask mandates? yet.. lockdowns were literally exluslively state decisions he just provided the scientific data to support those.. so like what is their problem exactly? also if lockdowns and mask mandates WERE federal policy.. does he know during the pandemic the head of the executive branch was....donald trump?

so to be accurate shouldnt the tweet be " prosecute governors who had their states health departments institute temporary lockdowns and mask mandates that slightly inconvienced my life for a bit over a year"

Airports and fed gov't buildings did the Fauci levels of caution. That's one sort of butthurt over masks.
"I'm flying from backwater Stack O Corpses, Texas to Seattle, why do I need a mask in this airport? We don't do that pussy mask shit here"

[s_bushido]

so like what is their problem exactly?

It's cute that you think conspiracy theorists and science deniers give a shit about trivial things like "facts" and "reality."

Whether or not Elon is stupid enough to buy into that garbage...or he's trolling to keep his name in the headlines...or he's just making sure right-wing dipshits know that Twitter is now a safe space for their particular brand of lunacy is another story.

[Rennadrel]

It's sad that this thread is basically a "bash elon thread" when he is literally doing more to try protect free speech than anyone has in the past, I dunno, yonks years. I will say though, that he did say he would unban every account that didn't violate country laws but he hasn't yet done so. When he does that, I will be happy.

You can't have free speech in absolutes. It doesn't work that way, especially when there are tons of countries that Twitter operates in that have hate speech laws that make a lot of what people think they should be allowed to say illegal.

[arandomuser]

It's sad that this thread is basically a "bash elon thread" when he is literally doing more to try protect free speech than anyone has in the past, I dunno, yonks years. I will say though, that he did say he would unban every account that didn't violate country laws but he hasn't yet done so. When he does that, I will be happy.

hitler once attempted a coup de tat and was banned from public speaking
his public speaking ban was lifted because the weimar believed even insurrectionist deserved free speech
most people in the old government that gave him leniency ended up in camps

im not keen on making the same mistake, which has uncanny parallels between trump and j6

[eschatological]

At this point, the only thing keeping Twitter afloat, for me, is the lack of a viable alternative. But on many days, I think maybe we don't need a public square like Twitter like...at all. All it's done has made people dumber and more reactionary, and amplified conspiracy nonsense that previously was limited just to your racist uncle ranting at Thanksgiving.

[Endus]

You can't have free speech in absolutes. It doesn't work that way, especially when there are tons of countries that Twitter operates in that have hate speech laws that make a lot of what people think they should be allowed to say illegal.

Let's recall that free speech "absolutists" are just child porn supporters and sexual harassers and neo-Nazis and the like. Every single one of them.

[eschatological]

I find it hilarious when the whole "censorship" debate started a couple years back, and conservatives were like "SECTION 230!!!!" most leftists/progressives, and liberals in general, were like: Yeah, corporations should be held liable for what's said on their platforms. Not doing so allows misinformation to proliferate, as well as hate (which Twitter cracked down on a bit after Jan6). There was a public square argument to be made, but because we understand nuance, we knew that applying a 1st amendment critique to Twitter was baseless and irrelevant. And, we disagreed with said conservatives on the content that was being censored/not censored, mainly based on the facts, which, as always, have never been on the conservatives side. We ruefully wished 1st Amendment protections did apply to Twitter, because then, INCITING VIOLENCE, and stochastic terrorism (which is what Elon Musk is doing when he says "Prosecute Fauci"), which has always been a limit on the freedom of speech, constitutionally, would have to be rigorously enforced on Twitter - probably killing it, as heavy moderation is too time and resource intensive.

But now that their right wing troll king is in charge, there's not a peep about section 230 and holding Twitter liable for what's said on their platform. It reveals, as always, they don't give a shit about censorship - they just have a fascist, authoritarian need to not only have an outlet for their hateful rhetoric, but have it be protected and respected by people who don't want it. It's the very definition of fascist.

Life is exhausting.

[arandomuser]

For all these former "trust and safety council" people complaining, the only safety they provided was harboring pedophiles and child porn on their platform for who knows how long rather taking it down and working with authorities to ensure that the scumbags involved were arrested. Kinda hard to trust people who so willingly allow illegal content on their website for as long as they did. And frankly, anyone on that "council" should be thrown in front of a judge and forced to testify. Twitter is a mess, and clearly has been for a long time, but Elon sure as hell isn't making it any better.

im assuming by pedo you mean like drag queen influencers or trans people since you changed the definition of pedophelia to include gender noncomformity. but no that is not pedophilia, and as far as i know there was no real pedophilia on twitter that went unbanned, and most pedo rings that got busted used private groups and DMs which just yesterday you people were outraged that the picture showed twitter mods has access to accounts DMS ( kind of hard to bust DM groups breaking the law... if you cant see their dms)- and the comments said they shouldnt be allowed to censor DMs at ALL. so you are just talking out of your ass

[Rennadrel]

im assuming by pedo you mean like drag queen influencers or trans people since you changed the definition of pedophelia to include gender noncomformity. but no that is not pedophilia, and as far as i know there was no real pedophilia on twitter that went unbanned, and most pedo rings that got busted used private groups and DMs which just yesterday you people were outraged that the picture showed twitter mods has access to accounts DMS ( kind of hard to bust DM groups breaking the law if you cant see their dms)- and the comments said they shouldnt be allowed to censor DMs at ALL. so you are just talking out of your ass

Considering none of what you said was in my comment, no. I was explicitly talking about instances like the lawsuit that Twitter is facing for allowing CSE to be shared on their platform. Sure, they might have dealt with some instances of pedophilia on their platform, but when they chose to ignore constant requests for takedowns of illegal content until the FBI and DHS got involved, it puts into question their effectiveness in dealing with pedophile rings.

[arandomuser]

Let's recall that free speech "absolutists" are just child porn supporters and sexual harassers and neo-Nazis and the like. Every single one of them.

yep its funny the people like the comment i replied to above dont remember that 4 chan was probably the #1 source for that and they never complained once, they cared too much about dissemiating russian disinfo to help trump to criticize their free speech haven

- - - Updated - - -

Considering none of what you said was in my comment, no. I was explicitly talking about instances like the lawsuit that Twitter is facing for allowing CSE to be shared on their platform. Sure, they might have dealt with some instances of pedophilia on their platform, but when they chose to ignore constant requests for takedowns of illegal content until the FBI and DHS got involved, it puts into question their effectiveness in dealing with pedophile rings.

well since high profile politicians like desantis changed the definition of child sexual explotation to include lgbt teachers and drag shows, i wonder how much stuff supposedly "reported" was actual nothingburger content wasting their time from actual instances, im sure if there was anything there it would be a bigger story and its just elon virtue signaling to people like matt walsh and politicians. anyways if you think thats a problem that was unadressed i dont think firing75% of the staff is going to help but you think elon is a saint protecting kids from the "elite cabal" with only the best of intentions so there really is no reaching you

[Edge-]

The spiral continues...

Rofl, he really is completely losing his mind and going all-in on the extreme right ring conspiracy theories because he lost a $44B game of chicken to some nerds at Twitter.