but at least now, with people knowing that yes, peoplewill leave twitter for even a similar service
there is an incentive to make that service other than how it was pre-,usk where people just said "but I'm establishes here, you're not offering better, just the same, so why move"
its just a question of what hits market first, no longer "if"
"Law and Order", lots of places have had that, Russia, North Korea, Saddam's Iraq.
Laws can be made to enforce order of cruelty and brutality.
Equality and Justice, that is how you have peace and a society that benefits all.

Twitter today:
"To address extreme levels of data scraping & system manipulation, we’ve applied the following temporary limits:
- Verified accounts are limited to reading 6000 posts/day
- Unverified accounts to 600 posts/day
- New unverified accounts to 300/day"
Needless to say, its going over well. Most platforms require you to login, but I can't think of any that throttle how many you can *read* a day, that's wild that they'd even think that would fly.
“There you stand, the good man doing nothing. And while evil triumphs, and your rigid pacifism crumbles to blood stained dust, the only victory afforded to you is that you stuck true to your guns.”
“There you stand, the good man doing nothing. And while evil triumphs, and your rigid pacifism crumbles to blood stained dust, the only victory afforded to you is that you stuck true to your guns.”
“There you stand, the good man doing nothing. And while evil triumphs, and your rigid pacifism crumbles to blood stained dust, the only victory afforded to you is that you stuck true to your guns.”
There are three wayt this can play out, In order of likely hood from least to most
Least likely: Musk, bored and noticing he's about to be known for killing twitter, reverses 90% of the mess he's done since buying and twitter more of less, returns to how it was in turns of moderation
somewhat likely with increasing chance as time goes on: Several of the competitor platforms launch, and they are on par or better than highpoint twitter, twitter withers on the vine
The reason Id buy stock in twitter if it was still public cause it would be dirty cheap atm: Musk's creditors get sick of this, and sue him for control, then return twitter to pre Musk standards
"Law and Order", lots of places have had that, Russia, North Korea, Saddam's Iraq.
Laws can be made to enforce order of cruelty and brutality.
Equality and Justice, that is how you have peace and a society that benefits all.
Seems like a pipe dream. Even it Musk mysteriously vanishes in a submarine incident tomorrow, the damage is done. The company wouldn't be able to instantly re-hire all the talent he drove off, and the confidence of users/advertisers that he's destroyed will take a while to rebuild (assuming it's even possible).
if it was a company with a board of directors, or you could say its ingrained in the company culture, Id agree
but ALL of this is from one whine daddy issued man-child with a wallet
if you get rid of Musk (not just he's not CEO, but 100%, he is out, cant ever assert control again), that would solve most of the user/advertiser issue
that would still leave the rehiring talent, but if the lenders were willing to toss him out, they'll be willing to burn cash to restart twitter
"Law and Order", lots of places have had that, Russia, North Korea, Saddam's Iraq.
Laws can be made to enforce order of cruelty and brutality.
Equality and Justice, that is how you have peace and a society that benefits all.
I suspect Mr. Muskrat broke Twitter and this is a partly a face-saving cover story.
https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/01/tech/...ded/index.html
My best guess is that he was trying something and ended up self-DDoSing.Hours after users began reporting the problems, billionaire owner Elon Musk tweeted that the site had applied temporary limits “to address extreme levels of data scraping and system manipulation.”
"For the present this country is headed in directions which can only carry ruin to it and will create a situation here dangerous to world peace. With few exceptions, the men who are running this Government are of a mentality that you and I cannot understand. Some of them are psychopathic cases and would ordinarily be receiving treatment somewhere. Others are exalted and in a frame of mind that knows no reason."
- U.S. Ambassador to Germany, George Messersmith, June 1933

I think Musk did an excellent job of demonstrating how risky burning cash in social media can be. How many tens of billions did he lose with this? I'd be surprised if anyone was willing to put that sort of money on the line with Twitter, especially with no guarantee that they'd even get the platform back up to pre-Musk levels.
/shrug

Who's dumber, Trump or Musk?
Trump has enough money to hire yes-men and fall-guys with enough money left over to pay minor fines for majorly not paying workers.
Musk has enough money to pay top dollar for someone to run a company, give them a blank check he signed and say "Make it work" then stay the fuck out.
Then Musk bought Twitter and thought it was himself personally, not his money being spent by smart people, was why shit worked.