Hasn't Musk been blocking/banning access to a variety of services, whose stated purpose was to search Twitter? And by "hasn't Musk" I mean "here is what I posted"
If an app used to get the info from Twitter directly, it's reasonable to believe that "data scraping" might get the data by reading a bunch of Tweets. And I think Musk still wants to keep that data for himself, either because (a) he wants to sell it and/or (b) he doesn't want people to see how much Nazi hate speech Twitter is paying him to post.Twitter will discontinue offering free access to the Twitter API starting February 9 and will launch a paid version, the Elon Musk-owned microblogging website said as it looks for more avenues to monetize the platform.
In a series of tweets, the Twitter Developer account said the firm will be ending support for both legacy v1.1 and the new v2 of its Twitter APIs. It did not immediately say how much it plans to charge for API usage.
The move follows Twitter abruptly changing the terms of its API in recent weeks; the API was used by many popular Twitter clients, such as Tweetbot and Twitterrific. Most third-party Twitter apps have shut down their mobile apps.
In the aftermath of the recent changes that saw Twitter shutter third-party clients, many other app developers had grown cautious about the ways they advanced development atop of the Twitter API. This new move might leave some developers to either abandon their products or pass on the cost to their customers.
Thousands of developers use the Twitter API for scores of things such as tracking changes among Twitter accounts and offering alerts. These are fun side projects for people who might not be willing to pay fees for something that they themselves are not monetizing.
Then there is another specific user base of the Twitter API: Researchers. Twitter’s new announcement might impact research in different areas, including hate speech and online abuse. Universities often use Twitter to study human behavior in different regions. Putting a cap on free API usage could also stop firms working around detecting the spread of misinformation on Twitter.
seeing almost every post I make is liked within a day by a pornbot account (and not even the same one, and not something that happened till Musk let the hyenas into the Pridelands.)
It could be that many accounts. Something that he caused.
- - - Updated - - -
its been 2 years
2 years that not one day could you look at twitter and say "hey things are improving now"
its safe to say that downward trend AINT reversing with Musk there
"Law and Order", lots of places have had that, Russia, North Korea, Saddam's Iraq.
Laws can be made to enforce order of cruelty and brutality.
Equality and Justice, that is how you have peace and a society that benefits all.
Just going to back this response:
There objectively is no "immediately" here. This thread is how many pages? How many months? This is not the first step, this is the continuation of a journey. The sky is between 25% and 60% closer to the ground, depending on if you count users or market value. This isn't about whether or not the sky is falling, it has been for a while. The question is, why do you think this move, specifically engineered to make Twitter less friendly to use, will cause the sky to go back up?
Seriously does anyone think this move was good for Twitter users? Not owners, users? How, exactly, will limiting views help Twitter get views?
"El Psy Kongroo!" Hearthstone Moderator

Anyone who pays for advertising on this site, WTF are you doing? This has to be killing your business in just people now getting limited but damnit for me, I would be pissed right now if an advertisement for Disney, Ford and whatever else is counting against my view count. Thus, I hope more and more users block every advertisement, which I do these days no matter what, they see.
"Buh dah DEMS"

The funniest part in all this is that Google is Twitter's #2 advertiser. So if you're wondering what advertisers are left on there, that's one of the big ones. So if a Google Cloud customer pulls out or doesn't fully pay their bill, as appears to have been the cause of this (despite prior comments to the contrary), I wonder if that will make the parent company will reconsider where to spend their advertising dollars. That would be the cherry on-top, if this debacle ends up costing them their #2 advertiser also.
The whole nonsense data scraping story was so strange too, rather than admitting the real issue. It doesn't take much knowledge of IT infrastructure to know that was disingenuous. The literal day they lost significant levels of bandwidth (their Google Cloud capacity) because their contract date was up on 7/1/23, they suddenly are forced to significantly throttle all Twitter user bandwidth. That's what really happened, not this silly story about a sudden need to stop "data scraping" by throttling users, which doesn't even make sense from a technical standpoint. And even if it they were considering a major risky change like that, they wouldn't do it a) on the day same day their Google Cloud contract expired (lol), and b) on a Friday before a long holiday weekend (double lol). Investors were already worried about the risk of the 7/1 date, because the contract renewal concerns and this exact risk of a major outage/impairment from it had become a story in the financial news a couple of weeks prior.


