Dontrike/Shadow Priest/Black Cell Faction Friend Code - 5172-0967-3866
An equivalent statement would be "I support free speech, just not child pornography". Or "I support free speech, but not violent threats aimed at specific people." Or "I support free speech, just not speech intended to incite a riot."
Not all speech is protected, and pretty much everyone agrees with that principle. "Free speech absolutists" are mostly liars seeking to protect certain types of abusive speech. But hey, maybe you're the exception, and you really do support child porn.
The same way we already do, and always have. The same way we decide whether someone's actions are criminal, or not.Not to deal in absolutes, but how are you going to decide what speech is censored or not?
Who's going to decide? That's the bloody thing.
The courts. That's what they're for. How is this even a question that you're confused about? Why do you people forget that laws always come down to the courts, and wring your hands about "who's gonna decide?" as if that's even an honest concern?
That private company's rules apply only to its own staff and its properties, and only to the extent of firing that staff or removing people from their private property. Given those limitations, of course it's okay for them to establish standards; the alternative would be a gross violation of their freedom of speech, and freedom of association. Sure seems like you don't really understand what "freedom of speech" actually means. About the only justifiable exception here is protected classes; a store can't ban "black people" from the property, for instance.Is it okay if a private company superimposes it's own set of rules on what you can or cannot(or should) say, or rather, we the society agree to a certain set of rules to which all the communal platforms should abide and refer to?
Get fucked Elom.
Musk calls Sweden’s strike ‘insane’ and Danish union chief piles on: ‘Even if you are one of the richest people in the world, you can’t just make your own rules’
Tesla Inc.’s labor dispute is expanding to Denmark, where the country’s largest union said it will halt shipments of the cars to Sweden in support of striking workers in the biggest Nordic country.
Harbor workers and drivers at the Danish 3F union will in about two weeks stop offloading Sweden-bound cars in Danish harbors and driving them to Sweden, preventing Tesla from circumventing a weeks-long blockade there.
Honestly, how poorly understood the concept of Free Speech is really is depressing. This is why we mock Freeze Peach, because people actually believe Freeze Peach Absolutism is a viable position to take and not completely indefensible when they start complaining about how of course they don't think child porn should be legal and that's so unfair that they're being asked to defend it as legal as part of their absolute position on Freeze Peach.
- - - Updated - - -
He's just gonna leave Europe for all his businesses since they'll actually either make him comply with regulations/laws or the workers will actually strike enough to cause problems.
Boy, I can only imagine how miserable he must be with the whole world "out to get him".
Warning : Above post may contain snark and/or sarcasm. Try reparsing with the /s argument before replying.
What the world has learned is that America is never more than one election away from losing its goddamned mindMe on Elite : Dangerous | My WoW charactersOriginally Posted by Howard Tayler
Just to kick him when he's down: Twitter has lost $25 billion in value since he paid for it. That is based on a value Musk himself gave it, in an internal email the NYTimes got their hands on. Twitter is also saddled with billions in new debt, lost 60% of its advertising, and lost 80% of its workforce.
Norwegian unions are on board as well, get fucked.
Kalmar Union's in da house!
Nordic Voltron ftw!
MMOC's second-favorite lawyer has analysis on Elon's "thermonuclear" lawsuit.
It's a tort suit, TLDR: Media Matters manipulated the Twitter algorithm intentionally to create these results that shouldn't otherwise happen because they have safeguards.
Which is pretty silly on its face: I mean, of course they intentionally created these accounts to see if these results were possible. That was the whole point. The whole point was to see if this outcome, which Elon had previously claimed was basically impossible, was actually impossible or not. It's clearly possible, and lots of people found tons of other examples so...oops.
Conservatives really seem to love wasting the judicial systems time with the most Karen-esque pointless lawsuits.