This guy's meltdown is absolutely spectacular. Its Howard Hughes in spectacular, overly public performance. Even if you don't want to watch it, he will make you observe every moment of his personal train wreck. He should be in a conservatorship by now, surely?
Tom from MySpace never had these problems. Then again Tom wasn't a Nazi sympathizer who doesn't know what free speech is.
“You're not to be so blind with patriotism that you can't face reality. Wrong is wrong, no matter who does it or says it.”― Malcolm X
I watch them fight and die in the name of freedom. They speak of liberty and justice, but for whom? -Ratonhnhaké:ton (Connor Kenway)
Tom is the social media creator/CEO that none of us ever deserved, and we never realized it until long after he was gone. Not that this is a remotely new sentiment given that it was started by the enshitification of Facebook and all that, but it seems to get more and more true over time.
Elon Musk Paid $44 Billion for Twitter. A Major Investment Firm Says It’s Now Worth Less Than $10 Billion
Here is the WaPo story (from Sept 1) and my favorite bit.Fidelity Investment slashed the value of its stake in X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter, revealing a sharp decline since billionaire tech mogul Elon Musk’s acquisition in October 2022.
Recent disclosures from the investment firm show that Fidelity’s stake in X is now worth about $4.19 million, which prices the overall company at around $9.4 billion. The figure marks a drastic drop from the $19.6 million holding Fidelity initially invested before Musk’s takeover and nearly a 79% reduction in value.
Since Musk’s purchase of X for $44 billion, the platform has experienced significant upheaval. X’s revenue plummeted by 50%, driven by what Musk described as a “massive decline” in advertising. The company has also faced criticism from users over function changes, such as the launch of a premium subscription service that offers verification badges and post-editing privileges.
The financial toll on X investors has been staggering. The eight largest investors in the platform have collectively lost $24 billion in value since Musk’s acquisition, according to The Washington Post.
That's not an OP ED. Someone wrote "vaporization of wealth" while trying to remain objective. Wow.Based on a Washington Post analysis using Fidelity’s estimates, the eight largest initial investments that were reported to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or otherwise publicly disclosed are worth about $5 billion less than when Musk bought X. His and his partners’ overall stake has shed $24 billion in value — a vaporization of wealth that has little parallel outside the realm of economic or industry-specific crashes, or devastating corporate scandals.
An interesting comparison I read elsewhere - Leon Musk pulled a 9/11 on Twitter.
$31B in losses/economic damage? Yep, slightly more than that, actually.
- - - Updated - - -
rofl, was looking up the exact reporting on the number, we saw the same thing probably
Dontrike/Shadow Priest/Black Cell Faction Friend Code - 5172-0967-3866
But that's not relevant. It doesn't matter if it was "actually" only worth 8 billion when he bought it; he still bought it for 44 and still managed to turn that 44 into less than 10. Turning 8 billion into 1 is still FAR LESS IMPRESSIVE than paying 44 for 8 and turning that into less than 10.
Last edited by Evil Midnight Bomber; 2024-10-02 at 10:53 AM.
On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.
- H. L. Mencken
https://x.com/marvinvonhagen/status/1841322424568340814
So remember Leon moving Twitter's HQ to TX, mostly because he didn't want to pay the rent anymore and wasn't paying it?
Well he's still in SF where all those libs are, just moving the AI teams at Twitter into the old OpenAI building.
When asked about the "incredibly different" vibes in the responses -
Yeah, this absolutely checks out. Leon lives in the manosphere and there are no girls allowed in the manosphere.significantly less girls, generally feels very much like you would expect an early elon startup to feel
openai however was super polished, felt much more like apple
top kek
Musk blasts FCC for 'illegally' pulling Starlink award, says it would've helped victims of Hurricane Helene
FOX News link *ding*
"What? Biden illegally pulled funding from Starlink right after the hurricane?"Musk, the CEO of SpaceX, responded to a post on X from a user who noted that "North Carolina would have 19,522 working Starlink kits available today after Hurricane Helene had the FCC not revoked in bad faith the grant that was awarded to SpaceX as the winning bidder."
"Had the FCC not illegally revoked the SpaceX Starlink award, it would probably have saved lives in North Carolina," Musk wrote in his response. "Lawfare costs lives."
No.
He applied for funding for a project, then couldn't complete the project and couldn't demonstrate that he could. So taxpayer money was withheld from a contractor who wasn't doing their job. And yes, Musk had 2 years to prove he could do it, he didn't, had another year, and still couldn't do it.SpaceX's Starlink, which provides high-speed internet via satellite connections, was awarded $885 million by the FCC in 2020 to help expand high-speed internet access around the country in rural areas.
The FCC rescinded that initial award in 2022, arguing Starlink wouldn't be reasonably capable of meeting the program's requirements, and reaffirmed that decision in Dec. 2023.
An FCC spokesperson told FOX Business in a statement, "Chairwoman Rosenworcel stands by the FCC's thorough review of a program meant to provide long-term access to reliable and affordable broadband in rural communities."
"But Biden removed funding from Musk personally and specifically!"
No.
Musk is lying because he is butthurt, and using people dying to make a political point."In this instance, the agency denied public funds to more than a dozen companies – not just Starlink – who did not meet the program requirements. As an independent agency, the FCC takes seriously its obligation to ensure that taxpayer dollars only go to entities that fully comply with the rules and the law," the FCC statement continued.
It's amazing to me that conservatives who are obsessed with "alpha male" and "traditional masculinity" nonsense hold up as two of their idols men who 1) whine like a bitch anything they face anything negative and 2) have heavily altered their appearances with cosmetic and possibly surgical means to appear more attractive. Or so they think.
It's absurd.
(I'm talking about Elon and Trump in case someone hasn't had enough coffee yet today)