I'm just waiting for the inevitable, "Put a computer chip in my head for ENHANCED FREEDOM, Daddy Musk." to start. I don't expect it will be long.
I'm just waiting for the inevitable, "Put a computer chip in my head for ENHANCED FREEDOM, Daddy Musk." to start. I don't expect it will be long.
I find it amusing that the man who made electric cars viable, popular, and profitable, has become "the bad guy".
Yeah I hear what you’re saying but if it puts your mind at ease much of this purchase has less to do with musk and more to do with who ultimately ends up with the lability.
Musk may continue to be stupid but many realities will reign him in it. He has a huge target on his back.
Therefore many of the same restraints that are in their lace now aren’t going anywhere.
Elon Musk can’t reinvent the wheel here or even change the ultimate mechanism in place. He can come unban whoever he wants however he can also be held liable for any harm they cause.
That’s why some complain about Twitter now. There is no conspiracy the only way you ever got banned in reality is when that liability extended to the board and ownership. Not because Twitter has ever been left or right.
But as I said before Elon likely just flushed billions down the toilet because honestly there is nowhere new to go on Twitter.
- - - Updated - - -
Because he didn’t do any of those things he just invested and became the face of those products. Their success had little or nothing to do with it.
And he was never a good guy to begin with, as to being a bad guy who knows. He has become a jackass though.
Something that will come back to ruin him right or left.
Milli Vanilli, Bigger than Elvis
You never lost free speech on Twitter, because you never had it. You ONLY GET FREE SPEECH with the fucking government.
- - - Updated - - -
No, you know several people that broke the fucking TOS and got consequences for it.
- - - Updated - - -
I don't think we have to worry about you buying anything.
- - - Updated - - -
And yet, they all have the same ToS, even some saying that you can't make fun of them like Truth Social does. So not actual real free speech platforms.
- - - Updated - - -
You don't have free speech anywhere, except with the government.
- - - Updated - - -
Wrong. You think he is a free speech absolutist, but he isn't. He has actually sued to stop people from speaking about him.
- - - Updated - - -
I can guarantee that it isn't going to change much. Because they would just turn into another GAB, Parler, Gettr, or Truth Social. Basically in the shitter.
I am going to laugh and use this argument exactly when people start getting furious over what Elon Musk did.
This whole thing is just delicious irony, because the very people that advocated and argued in favor of Twitter being able to do whatever it wanted are the very ones furious over what Musk could do.
Perhaps the solution is not to allow such incredibly powerful social media platforms that have an incredible influence over our lives be governed in what is and isn't allowed be control by private actors: Certainly we in Europe refuse this bullshit argument.
By the way fun fact: When the courts rule in favor of social media platforms, they do so on the basis of Freedom of Speech.
"Life is one long series of problems to solve. The more you solve, the better a man you become.... Tribulations spawn in life and over and over again we must stand our ground and face them."
This is hopelessly twisting the argument to something altogether different.
What? No you don't. Europe has more government regulation, and on top of it, those companies can largely do the same things.Perhaps the solution is not to allow such incredibly powerful social media platforms that have an incredible influence over our lives be governed in what is and isn't allowed be control by private actors: Certainly we in Europe refuse this bullshit argument.
Mostly also no. It depends entirely on the case and what is being decided. A social media platform has the right to tell people to leave on the same basis that an owner of a restaurant can eject a beligerent customer, or you can kick unruly people out of your house.By the way fun fact: When the courts rule in favor of social media platforms, they do so on the basis of Freedom of Speech.
It is baffling that any serious person could try to seriously promote the idea that freedom of speech means erasing the freedom of others to dislike what you have to say.
Is that so? In what way?
By doing his shit-coin bullshit he is already damaging the environment more than anything.
And his factories aren't really helpful for the local habitat of several species either, not to mention the extreme water consumption and defilement of drinking water.
You can't possibly mean that he has done more for the environment simply by selling EVs?
And when it comes to organised labour, he isn't really better than, for example, Amazon.
I remember reading that the new factory in Brandenburg for example pays 20% less than the bargained wage standards for the industry.
Overall he is a rich asshole like everyone else. You don't get rich by being "nice".
Last edited by KrayZ33; 2022-04-26 at 07:23 AM.
Why? It is 100% true. You don't get free speech ANYWHERE but with the government. And they rule that way, because of Citizen's United. It is their freedom of speech and freedom of association, as well as private property. Because they are using private servers to post bullshit.
Your childish simplistic one liners are pathetic.
But first thing first.
Tesla's EV or battery manufacturing is not an "energy program" by any definition of the word. So if you consider any program that was meant to reduce pollution somehow, Tesla has done fuckall, compared to for example these two government programs https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clean_...United_States) and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montreal_Protocol.
When it comes to energy programs...The French nuclear program has done more for the environment last Tuesday than Tesla has done throughout its entire existence. And that's exactly one example out of possible hundreds.
Sure
https://www.coolerfuture.com/blog/tesla-sustainability
Right now, Tesla is planning to have new factories – an expansion in China and a completely new Gigafactory in India. China gets 56.8% of its energy from coal, India also relies heavily on coal and is even building new coal plants despite climate change.
So while Tesla claims it is all about “saving the world”, are these the most environmentally-friendly locations to build a factory?In addition, large quantities of toxic chemicals are used in the extraction of lithium. In an article published by Wired, it is described that the soil, which contains lithium, is thus heavily contaminated – and this is despite the fact that only 0.2% of the affected soil contains the valuable metal. The other 99.8% destined to be contaminated with toxic chemicals is dumped back into the environment. In Bolivia, Chile and Argentina, known as “the lithium triangle”, this has led to huge environmental problems like soil contamination and water shortages.
In addition to lithium, Tesla also needs cobalt for their EVs, which they mine in the Democratic Republic of Congo alongside other tech giants like Apple, Dell and Microsoft. There, cobalt mining is linked with severe (and multiple) human rights violations. And yes, we’re talking children as young as 6 mining cobalt for Tesla’s EVs for $3 a day.
So this we can conclude: Just by mining rare metals, Tesla already violates not one but several of the Sustainable Development Goals.But the list of Tesla’s problems doesn’t stop there. In addition to the rare metal issue, there is another important one: water.
According to German media reports, Tesla’s new Gigafactory that is currently being built in Brandenburg, Germany will consume an incredible amount of water.
To be precise: the Brandenburg factory will consume about 3.6 million cubic metres of water per year, which is roughly 30% of the total water in the region. According to experts, this could even lead to a water shortage."Good Guy" Elon MuskTesla has also failed to publish official figures on their water use or waste levels. In addition, their report only briefly mentions that “they are currently working” on improving the recycling system for their old batteries.
Tesla is far from being transparent, and where there’s no transparency, there’s no sustainability.
In a study by Arabesque, which was analysed by Forbes, Tesla ranked in the bottom 15% in terms of company disclosure and transparency.
How come a company "so green" hardly publishes any figures or targets relating to its emissions, climate change, and other Sustainable Development Goals?
Last edited by Evil Midnight Bomber; 2022-04-26 at 08:30 AM.
“The biggest communication problem is we do not listen to understand. We listen to reply,” Stephen Covey.
as long as the batteries are made by the same material and energy is produced by the same manner nothing really changes , even if you gave everyone a tesla which you cant , tesla is a car for the rich mostly.
as for twatter , fuck that who cares
Oh I remember this being adressed in an interview when he was standing right in front of that factory alongside Armin Laschet.
His "funny" answer to the reporter was: "That's ridiculous, look how much it rains here... ha ha ha ha"
Fuck him.
And Laschet, who was running for chancellorship during that time just "smiled" as well.
Fuck him as well.
Last edited by KrayZ33; 2022-04-26 at 09:13 AM.
Hilarious that enforcing free speech causes such fervently negative reaction.