SCOTUS draft to remove Roe V Wade leaked

[NoiseTank13]

Clarence Thomas is already saying that contraception, same sex relationships, and same sex marriage should be reconsidered.

https://twitter.com/fordm/status/1540338064324698112

Should put interracial relationships in there as well- oh wait it personally affects him, of course he wouldn't, the fuckin' hypocrite.

[Nurasu]

Nevermind, the funniest part is Thomas going after every other precedent set by Roe in his concurring opinion except for Loving which would affect his own marriage. Craven asshole.

[Aphelios]

buying stock in hangers and alleys as we speak

[Adam Jensen]

So how do I become a Commander?

Being an econo-person doesn't sound like fun in the coming new order.

Or maybe I could be like, an Eye, like Nicholas . . . that could be fun too. But Commanders get a big house and a Wife and a handmaid . . . hmm . . .

Also, fuck SCOTUS.

[Belize]

The funniest part is where they say the decision has been returned to the people... where it was, but is no longer.

Reminder that the GOP doesn't consider women and minorities people, so when they say "Return to the people to decide" they mean the white male conservatives in charge of government.

[Darththeo]

Reminder that the GOP doesn't consider women and minorities people, so when they say "Return to the people to decide" they mean the white male conservatives in charge of government.

The issue is by people, they don't mean the individual. They mean the collective, but by saying people it is more "palatable" to the masses because it is up to the people, so it is perfectly fine. People don't remember how it was years ago. Not that it is much better now.

[omerome]

Screw the fence sitters, the pretend "moderates", the non-voters, the fake "woke" individuals, and hypocritical "Christians" who all thought it was cute to make this day happen.

And screw people like Susan Collins who was too stupid (because at this point, she is) and evil (also true) to think we should have believed their nonsense justifications to vote for these awful justices. And screw all of the people who think they have the right to dictate how a woman should make a decision with her own body. Anyone saying this is the greatest country in the world is a fool - nothing more. And I'm not sorry.

Someone yesterday said that we need to stop trying to vote blue and I agree, at this point, it's simply vote Democracy. That's the single issue we need to vote for. Democracy or bust. It's beyond Democrats vs. Republicans now.

[omeomorfismo]

so, are the churchs start to burning?

[Mekh]

I'm not saying I want things set on fire over this, but if it just so happened, I wouldn't feign outrage.

[Edge-]

Clarence Thomas is already saying that contraception, same sex relationships, and same sex marriage should be reconsidered.

https://twitter.com/fordm/status/1540338064324698112

Curiously, though based off some of the same theories, he leaves out Loving.

You know, the one that's actually directly applicable to him because he is in an interracial marriage.

[Kaleredar]

The issue is by people, they don't mean the individual. They mean the collective, but by saying people it is more "palatable" to the masses because it is up to the people, so it is perfectly fine. People don't remember how it was years ago. Not that it is much better now.

Actually they mean “state legislators.”

They’re not making this some nationwide ballot measure, because if they did the right to choose would be codified into law.

But letting heavily gerrymandered state legislators decide? It means that they get what they want; the red-controlled states automatically pass abortion restrictions without anyone having input.

[wunksta]

Susan Collins is deeply concerned, apparently.

[Varx]

Good, what's right has come to pass. Outside of the exception to rape (within reasonable time) and the life of the mother being a jeopardy, every baby has the right to live. And this is from someone who's agnostic and for the separation of church and state.

Murder is murder. What's the difference between a baby who crossed the line on a gestation threshold to not allow abortion and one who's a day behind? The entire thing is twisted.

Just practice safe sex people, ffs.

[Shadowferal]

Susan Collins is deeply concerned, apparently.

Manchin said something similar.

[Edge-]

Just practice safe sex people, ffs.

If only Republicans would actually support teaching kids about safe sex and ensuring they have access to contraceptives.

Naw, you're just like the rest of them. Including the states that want to outlaw abortion even in instances of rape or incest. Those are your people. That's who you're arm and arm celebrating with.

Y'all just hate women and want the state to ultimately have control over their bodily autonomy and health care decisions.

[Xyonai]

Good, what's right has come to pass. Outside of the exception to rape (within reasonable time) and the life of the mother being a jeopardy, every baby has the right to live. And this is from someone who's agnostic and for the separation of church and state.

Murder is murder. What's the difference between a baby who crossed the line on a gestation threshold to not allow abortion and one who's a day behind? The entire thing is twisted.

Just practice safe sex people, ffs.

Yeah, bodily autonomy is for suckers.

[Mekh]

Good, what's right has come to pass. Outside of the exception to rape (within reasonable time) and the life of the mother being a jeopardy, every baby has the right to live. And this is from someone who's agnostic and for the separation of church and state.

Murder is murder. What's the difference between a baby who crossed the line on a gestation threshold to not allow abortion and one who's a day behind? The entire thing is twisted.

Just practice safe sex people, ffs.

I mean that's not what a bunch of red states are pushing for and you know it, so I don't know why you're even playing pretend here.

[Varx]

Absolutely cooked take.

Cooked how? It's okay to kill a baby at 5 months, 3 weeks, 6 days but not one at 6 months?

I'm sorry but no one has the right to take a life.

If you have sex you know what can happen. So if you can't afford to care for the baby then put them up for adoption.

Simple as that.

Against out side of rape and life of the mother in jeopardy exception.

- - - Updated - - -

Yeah, bodily autonomy is for suckers.

What about autonomy for a baby?

No one forces pregnancy outside a rape.

If you can't afford the baby then don't be a dumbfuck and have unprotected sex.

[omeomorfismo]

Good, what's right has come to pass. Outside of the exception to rape (within reasonable time) and the life of the mother being a jeopardy, every baby has the right to live. And this is from someone who's agnostic and for the separation of church and state.

Murder is murder. What's the difference between a baby who crossed the line on a gestation threshold to not allow abortion and one who's a day behind? The entire thing is twisted.

Just practice safe sex people, ffs.

safe sex is not 100%
sorry, but better safe than sorry
and you know, abstinence doesnt work....

[Varx]

If only Republicans would actually support teaching kids about safe sex and ensuring they have access to contraceptives.

Naw, you're just like the rest of them. Including the states that want to outlaw abortion even in instances of rape or incest. Those are your people. That's who you're arm and arm celebrating with.

Y'all just hate women and want the state to ultimately have control over their bodily autonomy and health care decisions.

I love women, love my wife.

I dislike people who can't take the consequences of their actions and want a bail out at the cost of a life.

I clearly said I'm pro exception to rape and life of the mother. Read next time.