Republicans GQP and accountability are oil and water. If you stir the pot really hard, they mix for a few seconds and that's it.
They're throwing Bannon under the bus hoping that the rest of the rats can scurry free. The GQP also has a problem with loyalty. They always expect it and never give it.
But I think that was posted in the wrong thread.
Last edited by Cthulhu 2020; 2022-09-10 at 04:40 AM.
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
You really saying this when ford pardoned nixon? When neither reagan nor bush faced consequences for their crimes, with bush pardoning the people who helped him cover it up, just like trump did in bannon's case? The "rhetorical device" here seems to be bashing whatever point you're trying to make so hard in the face that it's unrecognizable.
Still though, this isn't the right thread for this garbage.
Dontrike/Shadow Priest/Black Cell Faction Friend Code - 5172-0967-3866
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...m-biden-latest
"It's about states rights!"
*proposes national abortion ban*
"BUT STATES RIGHTS!"
Reminder: Republicans always seem to lie. Always.
All politicians lie...
But anyway
Got to crawl before you can run.
Can't wait for that to get approved. I don't think I'll have enough popcorn.
Good to know so many innocent lives will be saved. Just wish it was sooner.
Only thing I hope is that rape (with reasonable time), and the life of the mother remain as exceptions. And that kids are tought properly about safe sex in school
Because you don't care about the life of the mother.
You realize you've admitted that, for you, this is a political tool that you support because it allows you to marginalize and suppress women, right?
You openly admitted you don't believe in the "life of the child" bullshit, because you support exceptions for things like rape. Is a child of rape somehow less of a human being, less deserving of rights? Of course not. No, the reason you make an exception is because you already know how horrible your position is to women, and you acknowledge that piling that additional abuse on top of a rape victim is, for you, "too far". She's already suffering enough for you, what with being a rape victim.
You make it excruciatingly clear how this issue is only about the harms you can inflict upon women, to you. And don't try and pull any "well, now I won't support exceptions" nonsense now that it's been called out; we already know what your motives actually are.
Lol you're like those teachers who ask their students "why did the author say "the sky is blue" to their students and then write a 10 page paper.in it.
You're over thinking it with lib goggles.
I don't hate women. But if you get pregnant through your own concented actions and aren't in mortal danger then there is no response to terminate the pregnancy.
Even if you can't financially care for the baby then you could always put them up for adoption.
No harm no foul.
Dude I'm Hispanic and was raised by a single mother. I lived in a 10 by14 "apartment" for almost a year when I was 6.
This ain't about attacking marginalized minorities. Last time I checked women aren't minorities anyway, lmfao.
This is about protecting babies from their irresponsible and mislead mothers