SCOTUS removes Roe V Wade

[Varx]

How kind of you to bestow upon us your superior knowledge of the universe and how it works.

Thank you, some appreciation.

- - - Updated - - -

Not actually what happened. All they said was that they disagreed with the Roe v. Wade decision that the Consitution implicitly protected a right to privacy. That's it.



Still denying women's right to withdraw consent, so you're still openly misogynistic.

Dude if men could also get pregnant I'd still feel the same.

It's not misogyny, it's reality.

And you think SCOTUS would bother with RvW if it was just some silly technicality. It's pure evil so they removed it painted it as w/e as crowd control. But mark my words it's just step 1.

- - - Updated - - -

WhAt Do YoU fEeL tHe PuRpOsE oF a TuMoR iS?

Seriously? Why are you so religious to believe it has a purpose?

I'm not, you're the one who using cancer as an argument because single cells and life and blah blah blah

[Pannonian]

Thank you, some appreciation.

- - - Updated - - -



Dude if men could also get pregnant I'd still feel the same.

It's not misogyny, it's reality.

And you think SCOTUS would bother with RvW if it was just some silly technicality. It's pure evil so they removed it painted it as w/e as crowd control. But mark my words it's just step 1.

- - - Updated - - -



I'm not, you're the one who using cancer as an argument because single cells and life and blah blah blah

"I'm not a religious person" vs. "It's pure evil!!"

Choose one.

[Varx]

"I'm not a religious person" vs. "It's pure evil!!"

Choose one.

Lol I can't do both????

Murder is evil right? You need to be be religious to comprehend that?

[Orange Joe]

I doubt killing an unwanted baby is ever gonna be accepted by everyone as moral.

You don't have to. It's none of your business.

[Mekh]

I'm not.

You did.

To US, cancer has one purpose and that is to kill you.

Why are you lying, liar?

[Varx]

You don't have to. It's none of your business.

Neither is homicide but I still wouldn't advocate for the right to kill bob and his wife just because.

[Specialka]

Technically you're wrong
People just don't evolve in their opinion while society keeps changing around you.
Someone who is a monarchist at 25 will probably still be that at 75 even if by then 99% of 25 year old are republicans.
50 years later the 75 year old republicans might be Conservative as there is a block of 25 year old that want universal suffrage for adults instead of just make suffrage.

Yeah no, people change their opinion given their life experience, what they get to see, the people they meet, etc... You do not keep the same opinion all your life.

[Edge-]

So outside if benign, tumors. What do you feel like a tumor feels it's purpose is?

Again, just doubling down on the "feels over reals".

Y'all live in fantasy worlds.

[Varx]

You did.



Why are you lying, liar?

Lying about what? I'm saying what we perceive cancer to be all about. I ain't pretending a tumor is alive and being diabolical.

- - - Updated - - -

Again, just doubling down on the "feels over reals".

Y'all live in fantasy worlds.

I'm just saying his silly game don't take that to heart..I'll stop though cuz he's clearly not serious and if he is then he got another issue.

[Mekh]

I'm saying what we perceive cancer to be all about.

So religion and metaphysics?

Come on, Cum Laude Dude! This is Trump-levels of ineptitude, having to retreat your permanent communication fumbles.

You sure you aren't actually pro-abortion and just suck at expressing it?

[Orange Joe]

Neither is homicide but I still wouldn't advocate for the right to kill bob and his wife just because.

So it's always just because? Never legitimate reasons? What if Bob reaching for his ar15.

[Mekh]

I'll stop though cuz he's clearly not serious.

To you? No.

To everyone else here, showing them you are wholly unqualified to speak on complex topics, because there is no Laude in your Cum and I doubt you are graduate of anything. It's a shame you still have a vote though.

[Varx]

So it's always just because? Never legitimate reasons? What if Bob reaching for his ar15.

Then that's okay. Context matters.

But there is no justifiable context outside of pregnancy viability or rape to terminate a preggy.

- - - Updated - - -

To you? No.

To everyone else here, showing them you are wholly unqualified to speak on complex topics, because there is no Laude in your Cum and I doubt you are graduate of anything. It's a shame you still have a vote though.

Dude the only thing you've succeeded in is showing your lack of perceiving context clues and your ability to reach to Pluto in an argument.

[Pannonian]

Then that's okay. Context matters.

But there is no context outside of pregnancy viability or rape to terminate a preggy.

So the life of the mother is not a reason for you. Your misogyny is showing (again).

[Endus]

Then that's okay. Context matters.

But there is no context outside of pregnancy viability or rape to terminate a preggy.

Wait, you're saying rape is a reason to permit abortion?

[Varx]

So the life of the mother is not a reason for you. Your misogyny is showing (again).

Ffs, I literally said pregnancy viability. You even quoted it.

[Mekh]

Dude the only thing you've succeeded in is showing your lack of perceiving context clues.

Oh, I am perfectly aware of the context. Which makes all these unforced errors even weirder, like starting to talk about the "purpose of cancer" or saying shit like "it's programmed". It's inept. I'm trying to figure out the source though. Is it because you don't know the biology any better? Is it because you are religious after all? I'm dying to know, where your particular brand of stupid is coming from.

[Varx]

Wait, you're saying rape is a reason to permit abortion?

I mean I've stated this time and time again as an exception, and you know this so I dunno why you acting all Pikachu face.

[Cthulhu 2020]

Na that's the governments job.

Im sure if both sides put their heads in the game it could be figured out. Starting with proper sex ed and accessibility to proper contraceptives

Hey listen, if conservatives are willing to pass reform to give women free contraceptives and improve sexual education in schools, as well sweeping reforms that give financial support for infants and children in low income households, I might reconsider this whole pro-choice thing.

But we know conservatives don't care about life. They only care about controlling women's bodies. So none of that is going to happen, and I'll continue to support pro-choice efforts.

[Varx]

Oh, I am perfectly aware of the context. Which makes all these unforced errors even weirder, like starting to talk about the "purpose of cancer" or saying shit like "it's programmed". It's inept. I'm trying to figure out the source though. Is it because you don't know the biology any better? Is it because you are religious after all? I'm dying to know, where your particular brand of stupid is coming from.

Okay.

10 char