SCOTUS removes Roe V Wade

[Varx]

Harassment is illegal in many places. Including here in the US.

LOL verbal harassment is never illigal. You can't tell someone to kill them selves or incite violence. But you can be a prick all you want.

Now your job has the right to terminate you but that is never criminal behavior.

[Endus]

How is it a lie????

You just confirmed that they criminalizing calling people slurs

It wasn't a criminal case. That's part of the lie.

And it wasn't "calling people slurs". It was repeated and continuous harassment in a workplace.

You continue lying.

- - - Updated - - -

LOL verbal harassment is never illigal. You can't tell someone to kill them selves or incite violence. But you can be a prick all you want.

https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/PEN/240.30

Your claim's not even true in the USA. Verbal harassment clearly violates State laws pretty much everywhere.

[BeepBoo]

Another person comparing disease to pregnancy, Jesus Christ....

A fetus is a parasite... so...

And one more time for fun boy and girls, if the life of mommy is in danger then it's an exception.

Right, but I don't care about that. I care about you admitting you're not for equality and that you value the autonomy of the fetus more than the mom*

*unless the mom is in danger of death

Outside of that the body easily recovers from pregnancy

Fucking wild. Imagine thinking stretch marks, fat gain, or a c section scar (really common, and you can't tell the mom is "in danger" for needing this till literal birth) are easy recoveries. You're living in fucking la la land. And, again, why does the mom not get treated equally till AFTER birth? Just because "I don't recognize it as being bad enough to care about" is not a good enough reason.

[SoulForge]

LOL verbal harassment is never illigal. You can't tell someone to kill them selves or incite violence. But you can be a prick all you want.

Now your job has the right to terminate you but that is never criminal behavior.

Your levels of ignorance do not have limits;

S 240.26 Harassment in the second degree.

A person is guilty of harassment in the second degree when, with intent to harass, annoy or alarm another person:

He or she strikes, shoves, kicks or otherwise subjects such other person to physical contact, or attempts or threatens to do the same; or
He or she follows a person in or about a public place or places; or
He or she engages in a course of conduct or repeatedly commits acts which alarm or seriously annoy such other person and which serve no legitimate purpose.

Subdivisions two and three of this section shall not apply to activities regulated by the national labor relations act, as amended, the railway labor act, as amended, or the federal employment labor management act, as amended.

Harassment in the second degree is a violation.

S 240.30 Aggravated harassment in the second degree.

A person is guilty of aggravated harassment in the second degree when, with intent to harass, annoy, threaten or alarm another person, he or she:

Either (a) communicates with a person, anonymously or otherwise, by telephone, or by telegraph, mail or any other form of written communication, in a manner likely to cause annoyance or alarm; or (b) causes a communication to be initiated by mechanical or electronic means or otherwise with a person, anonymously or otherwise, by telephone, or by telegraph, mail or any other form of written communication, in a manner likely to cause annoyance or alarm; or
Makes a telephone call, whether or not a conversation ensues, with no purpose of legitimate communication; or
Strikes, shoves, kicks, or otherwise subjects another person to physical contact, or attempts or threatens to do the same because of a belief or perception regarding such person`s race, color, national origin, ancestry, gender, religion, religious practice, age, disability or sexual orientation, regardless of whether the belief or perception is correct; or
Commits the crime of harassment in the first degree and has previously been convicted of the crime of harassment in the first degree as defined by section 240.25 of this article within the preceding ten years.

Laws similar to this exist all over the place. Verbal Harassment can indeed be illegal.

[Varx]

It wasn't a criminal case. That's part of the lie.

And it wasn't "calling people slurs". It was repeated and continuous harassment in a workplace.

You continue lying.

- - - Updated - - -



https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/PEN/240.30

Your claim's not even true in the USA. Verbal harassment clearly violates State laws pretty much everywhere.

Read again, that is all to threaten physical harm. Jesus Christ haha

Calling people racial or homophobic slurs ain't criminalizing behavior and never should be.

Lol....

Canada on the other hand are criminalizing misgendering people cuz their feefees are a human right, lmao.

- - - Updated - - -

Your levels of ignorance do not have limits;



Laws similar to this exist all over the place. Verbal Harassment can indeed be illegal.

If you threaten PHYSICAL harm....

- - - Updated - - -

A fetus is a parasite... so...


Right, but I don't care about that. I care about you admitting you're not for equality and that you value the autonomy of the fetus more than the mom*

*unless the mom is in danger of death


Fucking wild. Imagine thinking stretch marks, fat gain, or a c section scar (really common, and you can't tell the mom is "in danger" for needing this till literal birth) are easy recoveries. You're living in fucking la la land. And, again, why does the mom not get treated equally till AFTER birth? Just because "I don't recognize it as being bad enough to care about" is not a good enough reason.

A parasite is always a different organism, try again.

Omg pregnancy fat and scars poor mom, we can't have that now can we let's kill the baby before mommies sex appeal drops.

[SoulForge]

If you threaten PHYSICAL harm....

It is NOT limited to threatening physical harm.

[Varx]

It is NOT limited to threatening physical harm.

You're right,

You also can't yell fire or bombs in crowds. Or threaten mass shooting bombing or we. Or tell someone to kill themselves

But ANYONE can be as bigoted as they want to to anyone they wish.

Period...

[SoulForge]

You're right,

You also can't yell fire or bombs in crowds. Or threaten mass shooting bombing or we. Or tell someone to kill themselves

But ANYONE can be as bigoted as they want to to anyone they wish.

Period...

No one said they couldn't. What the law in Canada does is go beyond that. Being a bigoted piece of trash is not harassment. Being that bigoted piece of trash in a harassing way IS where the law comes into play. If I sit down at the table next to you in a restaurant and start making comments about you, repeatedly, for whatever reason, that is harassment.

[Edge-]

But ANYONE can be as bigoted as they want to to anyone they wish.

Period...

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...-man-rcna45463

Your knack for being consistently wrong on literally everything you post in this thread is genuinely impressive.

[SoulForge]

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...-man-rcna45463

Your knack for being consistently wrong on literally everything you post in this thread is genuinely impressive.

Everyone has to have a talent.

[Varx]

No one said they couldn't. What the law in Canada does is go beyond that. Being a bigoted piece of trash is not harassment. Being that bigoted piece of trash in a harassing way IS where the law comes into play. If I sit down at the table next to you in a restaurant and start making comments about you, repeatedly, for whatever reason, that is harassment.

Yeah and completely legal. Welcome to the real world.

- - - Updated - - -

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...-man-rcna45463

Your knack for being consistently wrong on literally everything you post in this thread is genuinely impressive.

The man spat to the Indian. That is a physical attack. Pay attention to the video report.

But of course. The liberal California media focused on the bigotry.

Lmao wow.
Good try lol but big fail.

- - - Updated - - -

Everyone has to have a talent.

The man spat to the Indian. So yeah.... Again nice try big fail.

[Pannonian]

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...-man-rcna45463

Your knack for being consistently wrong on literally everything you post in this thread is genuinely impressive.

Well, probably we just cannot understand him, as he as summa cum laude graduate is very knowledgeable. I'm sure. Apart, from basic concepts like words and logic, the laws of his own country, and at least a modicum of internal consistency... self-reflection probably also wasn't high on the priority list...

[Edge-]

But of course. The liberal California media focused on the bigotry.

I'm sorry reality is an inconvenience to your fantasy.

[Varx]

I'm sorry reality is an inconvenience to your fantasy.

The vid literally said that he SPAT, which is a physical assault, are you okay?

[BeepBoo]

A parasite is always a different organism, try again.

K. LIKE a parasite. Doesn't matter. It's an organism taking something away from another organism.

Omg pregnancy fat and scars poor mom, we can't have that now can we let's kill the baby before mommies sex appeal drops.

Yet another example of "*I* don't care about what you care about, so your feelings are invalid!"
Again, stellar display of "equality" here. Just admit you care more about the baby's autonomy than the mom's. Because you do. And THEN maybe we can have a discussion about why that's the case and what's wrong with that.

[SoulForge]

Yeah and completely legal. Welcome to the real world.

You just said Canada made it illegal several posts back.

Are you confused about something?

[Orange Joe]

Me nothing. SCOTUS, blanket abolish. Minus exceptions

- - - Updated - - -



Actually I'm pro gay rights. And I'm Hispanic dude ... Lmao u even said it.

- - - Updated - - -



Yeah saving babies is going backwards ...

Scotus had that chance, they said it's a state right. Now that states are enshrining it In law scotus can't do shit

[Yetanothernewbie]

Remember, folks, totally not Republican or conservative or anything

Also totally blames that awful lefty socialist media for Gen Z not voting against their own self interests!

[Orange Joe]

How is it a lie????

You just confirmed that they criminalizing calling people slurs


You even said yourself that anyone has the right to be a bigoted asshole.

LOLOLOLOL.

and now you prove my point that if liberals had it their way they'd force their views on others.

Good job my man.

If I sue you and you lose. Are you a criminal? Do you understand the difference between civil and criminal law?

[Endus]

Read again, that is all to threaten physical harm. Jesus Christ haha

"2. With intent to harass or threaten another person, he or she makes a telephone call, whether or not a conversation ensues, with no purpose of legitimate communication".

Liar.

Calling people racial or homophobic slurs ain't criminalizing behavior and never should be.

Again, the law in Canada you're bitching about is not criminal law.

Canada on the other hand are criminalizing misgendering people cuz their feefees are a human right, lmao.

Repeating the lie after being corrected demonstrates it's malicious intent, not ignorance.