Yeah, so I went into some Conservative spaces today to see what they're all saying and my god, the Doomers are giving my tingles.
Between Kelly getting absolutely fucking Wholloped and a conservative WI SC seat lost as well as Knodl barely winning re-election for Darling's Republican Senate seat. Everyone is saying the general same thing:
Republicans are fucked because of terrible policies.
Their is like 20-25% of the base who are hardcore pro-lifers and if they switch toward a pro-choice platform, they immediately lose that 20-25% of the base.
Then their is a large number of independents and moderates who are pro-choice and the overturning of Roe resulted in those people just voting straight D tickets now throwing everything into whack.
Conservatives, meanwhile keep pushing these awful bills, like in Florida, and continue to try to ban it everywhere. Democrats are running on a heavy pro-choice message.
Then look at the campaigns being won. Kelly had nothing to attack with to try and get that WI Supreme Court seat. Meanwhile, Janet discussed how she was pro-choice, pro-gun restrictions and her message resonated with more people resulting in a 10 point shellacking in a state that is usually won/lost by 1-2 points.
The general consensus among Conservatives in those spaces is they've got no clue what to do. With an energized Dem party and poor policy, they don't think they're winning 2024 with Trump or any other candidate.
I just listed 3. I could list more.
You're trying to defend comparing Idaho (Trump +30) to NC (Trump +1.3) by talking about Texas? Just tell me you never had any intention of defending what you wrote. This is like X state is Y State, and let me talk about Z State to tell you why my fears are justified.Your arguments about Idaho are the exact same arguments that were made about the Texas law that made its way to the Supreme Court and was left in place. Pro-choice has been the popular opinion regarding abortion rights for decades, it doesn't change the fact that the Republican party has been trying to repeal Roe v. Wade all this time. It also doesn't change the fact that, regardless of whether or not it goes through, Republicans WANT it to go through.
I wouldn't have thought you'd hold this opinion, but I applaud sticking to your principles!And yes, I would point out that if a Republican performed the same stunt I would have the same opinion. Deceiving your voters is wrong regardless of who is doing it.
Thank you acknowledging that this is a problem (pending upon her choices in your opinion at least, we can disagree there).
Representatives aren't puppets of their national or state party structure. It also presupposes that she will abandon everything she ran on. Go back to my previous posts if you're confused about my thoughts in the event she abandons her core campaign issues.
"I wish it need not have happened in my time." "So do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us."
Yes. This is what happens when someone declares that they're switching to the other party after winning a seat. They lose the benefit of the doubt that their word on their policy positions is worth more than a particularly loud fart.
Especially when you swap to a Republican party that has been ramping up their anti-democracy, anti-LGBT, anti-democracy, and anti-woman rhetoric/legislature as they feel the noose of inevitable demographic changes tightening around their worthless throats.
Last edited by s_bushido; 2023-04-07 at 12:19 AM.
Since we can't call out Trolls and Bad Faith posters and the Ignore function doesn't actually ignore it. Add
"mmo-champion.com##li.postbitignored"
to your ublock or adblock filter to actually ignore ignored posters. Now just need a way to ignore responses to them as well.
/me looks up from sharpening guillotine
Is it time NOW?
I mean...I'm fully expecting media to start doing some serious digging into her to see if suddenly some huge debts disappeared out of nowhere. Or maybe there's some embarrassing family member that someone else discovered that she's trying to protect.
It's absolutely possible she just got upset that Democrats were big 'ol meanies to her and not very nice at all and thinks that for some reason the party that wants to control her uterus is going to be any more pleasant. I don't find it very likely or reasonable, but quite possible.
It wouldn't be as shocking as it would have been 10 years ago. Everyone has a price, and those 3 would (and have) sold out the American populace to line their pockets and there won't be any consequences for them. Just like there won't be for anyone else pulling them same thing that aren't normal Americans. Edge's post also reminded me that Kavanaugh is another we can add to the list of debts and such just disappearing with zero consequence.
“You're not to be so blind with patriotism that you can't face reality. Wrong is wrong, no matter who does it or says it.”― Malcolm X
I watch them fight and die in the name of freedom. They speak of liberty and justice, but for whom? -Ratonhnhaké:ton (Connor Kenway)
Yes, I mentioned them because the guy who has been throwing money at Clarence Thomas was also giving them money too. I know about Manchin's history with Coal but that money could explain some of his other stances and Sinema we knew what was up when she started going to McConnell's rallies as a guest that McConnell cheered for screwing the US for his benefit.
But to find out she flipped because some other billionaire has been floating cash her way and maybe she just wanted to retire after this one with a massive payday on her way out and a middle finger to the American public on her last term. Would not surprise me but also would be completely messed up as well.
Since we can't call out Trolls and Bad Faith posters and the Ignore function doesn't actually ignore it. Add
"mmo-champion.com##li.postbitignored"
to your ublock or adblock filter to actually ignore ignored posters. Now just need a way to ignore responses to them as well.
Follow the cash. If I were a betting person, I'd put lots of money on she got a huge donation from special interests and sold out her values. She's run on a VERY left wing platform for a long time. A mild altercation with the party she aligns her views with wouldn't cause her to do a complete 180 on EVERY SINGLE policy she believes in.
It's not exactly some big secret that a lot of washed up celebrities who don't have cash flow jump down the right wing pipeline because it's the only way for them to gain relevance and secure an income. There's a lot of money in being an insincere right wing ally.
- - - Updated - - -
It's possible, but as I mentioned, if I was a betting type of person, I'd absolutely bet a lot of money against this.
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
I'm ready to eat the rich, but we need to take this one step at a time. We have a fascist problem that needs to be taken care of before we start worrying about the liberal capitalists.
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
"I wish it need not have happened in my time." "So do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us."
You didn't. You listed reasons for her to drop out of the Democratic party itself at best, nothing that would necessitate her joining the opposing party.I just listed 3. I could list more.
You mean the states that are all being ran by the same party and have been proven to be colluding at a national level? What's your lame-ass take on this then?You're trying to defend comparing Idaho (Trump +30) to NC (Trump +1.3) by talking about Texas? Just tell me you never had any intention of defending what you wrote. This is like X state is Y State, and let me talk about Z State to tell you why my fears are justified.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/con...tion-rcna38301
The author of the Freedom to Travel for Health Care Act, Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto of Nevada, requested consent to quickly pass the legislation but met resistance from Sen. James Lankford of Oklahoma, who objected on behalf of Republicans.I even gave you a heads-up that this policy was not going to be isolated to Idaho, and your response was it couldn't because the population difference? As if these don't have Republican majorities or super-majorities. Fucking ignorance of the highest class right there. That's the REPUBLICAN PARTY blocking protections for interstate travel for abortions. At the National level. And just because I sincerely doubt you're aware of this, but Oklahoma is not Idaho. It's a different state entirely. Well, minus the politics.The eight-page bill would make it unlawful for a person or a government official to prevent or punish traveling across state lines "to receive or provide reproductive health care that is legal in that State." It also would bar states from imposing laws that prohibit women from traveling to other states to get abortions.
I applaud you for having a thought of your own for once instead of parroting talking points from Fox and Breitbart. Good for you! On my side, I would like to retract my statement as it's clear to me now that you were not posting in good faith. I expect you to defend Cotham's actions as well once she starts voting alongside Republican lines.I wouldn't have thought you'd hold this opinion, but I applaud sticking to your principles!
- - - Updated - - -
Keep us posted when you decide to actually answer the question: why she switched opposing viewpoints as opposed to just dropping out of the party.
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-...in-post-roe-te
This is wilfull and intentional torture of girls and women, leaving them with lifelong trauma for literally zero reason other than Republicans in many states, including Texas, just can't be bothered to tighten up the language around their laws and are perfectly happy with pregnant girls and women suffering.Her name was Halo, and she was born last week, on March 29, two months early and weighing 3 pounds. She lived for four hours, dying in the arms of her father, Luis Villasana.
Her mother, Samantha Casiano, knew their baby wouldn't survive long because she had anencephaly – part of Halo's brain and skull never developed.
Now, they can't afford to give their newborn daughter the funeral they would like to give her.
If Republicans cared they'd be out in the streets protesting this outrage. They'd be demanding that these girls and women get the care they need to protect their health and not pointlessly traumatize them and saddle them with medical bills they may not be able to afford.
I'm perfectly, 100% fine saying that if Texas Republican voters aren't out there protesting this shit that's for one reason: Because this is either their goal as well, or because they genuinely lack basic human empathy to care for the needless suffering their party is inflicting on pregnant girls and women.
This is monstrous, and it's yet another monstrous story amongst too many to count in recent years. Brought to us by the Republican party.
@tehdang, this is from Texas, not Idaho. What's your excuse this time for this legislation being passed? Is this another instance where Republican states are doing the same shit but somehow aren't comparable? Do you think that there won't be a similar law passed by Texas as more and more people leave the state for abortions? If so, what evidence do you have to back that up?