1. #681
    Quote Originally Posted by tehdang View Post
    You weren't personally a slave, so how dare you have an opinion on slavery! Decide for yourself if you wish to own slaves. Or murder. Or if stealing is wrong.
    ...how detached from reality do you have to be to not realize that "states' rights!" was literally the rallying cry of those who wanted to continue the practice of slavery. And yet here you are, "sticking with the states." You're beyond parody at this point.

  2. #682
    The Lightbringer tehdang's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    3,021
    Quote Originally Posted by Polyxo View Post
    Republicans are apparently already planning on trying to institute a total ban on abortion at the federal level, with Lankford and Ernst spearheading the effort.
    I heard 6 weeks (WaPo)
    A group of Republican senators has discussed at multiple meetings the possibility of banning abortion at around six weeks, said Sen. James Lankford (Okla.), who was in attendance and said he would support the legislation. Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) will introduce the legislation in the Senate, according to an antiabortion advocate with knowledge of the discussions who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal strategy. Ernst did not respond to a request for comment.
    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Evil Midnight Bomber View Post
    Abortion, unlike slavery, murder, or stealing, doesn't affect anyone else.
    The "someone else" of abortion didn't really get a vote, and the prior trimester system and bans try, at some level, to weigh the rights of the someone else. It is expressly the someone else that makes this issue troublesome.

    Quote Originally Posted by s_bushido View Post
    ...how detached from reality do you have to be to not realize that "states' rights!" was literally the rallying cry of those who wanted to continue the practice of slavery. And yet here you are, "sticking with the states." You're beyond parody at this point.
    I have to agree with people that wanted to continue slavery to have an opinion on where current matters should be decided?

    You can choose to put your faith in the advocates of slavery. Don't tell me that I'm not allowed to disagree.
    "I wish it need not have happened in my time." "So do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us."

  3. #683
    Quote Originally Posted by tehdang View Post
    I heard 6 weeks (WaPo)
    On average women only discover they are pregnant at around 5-6 weeks. "My period is late" and all that.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by tehdang View Post
    I have to agree with people that wanted to continue slavery to have an opinion on where current matters should be decided?

    You can choose to put your faith in the advocates of slavery. Don't tell me that I'm not allowed to disagree.
    You seem to have completely missed the point that if slavery had been left to the states to decide... there would still be slavery.
    On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.

    - H. L. Mencken

  4. #684
    6 weeks is ridiculous for anyone that has any understanding of biology. It's effectively a total ban in all but name.

  5. #685
    The Lightbringer tehdang's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    3,021
    Quote Originally Posted by Evil Midnight Bomber View Post
    On average women only discover they are pregnant at around 5-6 weeks. "My period is late" and all that.
    So it's not a "total ban on abortion," and you would assert it amounts to one or it effectively is one?

    You seem to have completely missed the point that if slavery had been left to the states to decide... there would still be slavery.
    You told me that states rights was an argument that pro-slavery people made. That I'm detached from reality for arguing that abortion laws should be decided at the state level. I don't see how you arrogate to yourself the right to force me to agree with slavers.

    You're choosing to miss the point that you hold a great number of moral opinions on issues that affect others. Calling abortion special, like there's no possibility or debate on the other participant in the abortion, is asinine.
    "I wish it need not have happened in my time." "So do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us."

  6. #686
    Quote Originally Posted by tehdang View Post
    I'll stick with states
    How can the states in any way accurately represent the values of all their residents, though? I mean, you've said this is a question of values, right? You feel the federal level is too broad, but somehow the state level is "just right".

    I'm curious to know what the threshhold is for this, since it doesn't appears to be based on land mass or population size - given the radical differences. Is it the mention of states in the 10 Amendment? If so I'll kindly point out that it also mentions "to the people.", who are the very individuals whose values are in question.

    It's just weird hearing the conservative argument against limited government by eliminating what is the bedrock of a great many personal freedoms and raising the specter of big government infiltrating our personal lives even further.

  7. #687
    Quote Originally Posted by tehdang View Post
    So it's not a "total ban on abortion," and you would assert it amounts to one or it effectively is one?
    I'm just stating how ridiculous it is to put a 6 week clock on it. Discover your pregnant at 5.5 weeks and you have 3 days to decide if you want to keep it. I have a feeling that would force a lot of women to make a decision to abort they might not have made if they weren't fighting against the clock.

    Or discover at 6 weeks and be told "Oh daaaang...if only you got here yesterday."

    You told me that states rights was an argument that pro-slavery people made.
    No I didn't bruh.

    That I'm detached from reality for arguing that abortion laws should be decided at the state level.
    I also didn't say you were detached from reality. But you saying that I did say that is a strong argument that you might be.

    I don't see how you arrogate to yourself the right to force me to agree with slavers.
    Again, Never said anything like that.

    You're choosing to miss the point that you hold a great number of moral opinions on issues that affect others. Calling abortion special, like there's no possibility or debate on the other participant in the abortion, is asinine.
    The other "participant" is not capable of having an opinion on the matter. You're inserting your opinion on the matter in it's stead.
    Last edited by Evil Midnight Bomber; 2022-05-05 at 04:58 AM.
    On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.

    - H. L. Mencken

  8. #688
    Banned cubby's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    the Quiet Room
    Posts
    35,050
    Quote Originally Posted by tehdang View Post
    I don't think a national solution makes any sense, because it is a question of values. Full ban, 6 weeks, 15 weeks, 20 weeks, second trimester, third trimester, all the way up to crowning/delivery, exceptions, funding, medical certifications, oversight.
    The only solution is a national one - no ban, ever, at all. Period.

    In no other circumstance in the United States is a person required to sacrifice their body to save another. That is the beginning and the end of the conversation.

  9. #689
    Quote Originally Posted by tehdang View Post
    I heard 6 weeks (WaPo)

    6 weeks is an effective ban in the vast majority of circumstances. At best it forces the choice on the woman in a very short notice which cannot honestly be seen as a good thing. At worst the pregnancy is discovered too late to act upon it. That is not a reasonable solution.
    It is all that is left unsaid upon which tragedies are built -Kreia

    The internet: where to every action is opposed an unequal overreaction.

  10. #690
    Quote Originally Posted by tehdang View Post
    I have to agree with people that wanted to continue slavery to have an opinion on where current matters should be decided?

    You can choose to put your faith in the advocates of slavery. Don't tell me that I'm not allowed to disagree.
    When you argue that states' rights supersede the rights of citizens of this country, that's exactly what you're doing. I'm sorry if you're incapable of comprehending that.

    And if you don't believe that abortion is somehow "special," feel free to name another case where a person is required by law to sustain the life of another using their own body. I'll wait.

  11. #691
    Quote Originally Posted by tehdang View Post
    I don't think a national solution makes any sense, because it is a question of values. Full ban, 6 weeks, 15 weeks, 20 weeks, second trimester, third trimester, all the way up to crowning/delivery, exceptions, funding, medical certifications, oversight.
    A national ban makes total sense. It will save the most amount of lives and not let people just go to the state next door to get an abortion done.

    Hopefully the GOP can pull off wins in 2022/24 and get this done.

  12. #692
    Quote Originally Posted by MuH sTaTe LiNeS View Post
    A national ban makes total sense. It will save the most amount of lives and not let people just go to the state next door to get an abortion done.

    Hopefully the GOP can pull off wins in 2022/24 and get this done.
    A poster so comically transparent that it belongs in one of those "wakes up in a pregnant woman's body and realizes how utterly ignorant and stupid he's been his entire life" sort of movies.

  13. #693
    BREAKING: Louisiana Republicans have voted HB 813 out of committee (7-2), defining a fertilized egg as a human. HB 813 makes abortion at any point a homicide, with no exception for minors, rape, incest, or ectopic pregnancies. This is beyond horrific.
    https://twitter.com/QasimRashid/stat...H3diqy7zg&s=19
    Last edited by szechuan; 2022-05-05 at 05:24 AM.
    A Fetus is not a person under the 14th amendment.

    Christians are Forced Birth Fascists against Human Rights who indoctrinate and groom children. Prove me wrong.

  14. #694
    Quote Originally Posted by szechuan View Post
    BREAKING: Louisiana Republicans have voted HB 813 out of committee (7-2), defining a fertilized egg as a human. HB 813 makes abortion at any point a homicide, with no exception for minors, rape, incest, or ectopic pregnancies. This is beyond horrific.
    https://twitter.com/QasimRashid/stat...H3diqy7zg&s=19
    Oh, that's the beginning. The iron is hot and it will be struck with extreme prejudice. Expect more laws like this, attempts to stop people from going out of state to get an abortion, and a push for nationwide ban as soon as humanly possible.

    But remembers guys, it's all about state's right /s.
    It is all that is left unsaid upon which tragedies are built -Kreia

    The internet: where to every action is opposed an unequal overreaction.

  15. #695
    Quote Originally Posted by tehdang View Post
    Same right back at you. If none of those questions on proposed legislation matter to you, and you don't even regard it as a question of values, then maybe you're the impediment to compromise
    Why don't you go fucking compromise on your OWN RIGHTS?
    Quote Originally Posted by Jtbrig7390 View Post
    True, I was just bored and tired but you are correct.

    Last edited by Thwart; Today at 05:21 PM. Reason: Infracted for flaming
    Quote Originally Posted by epigramx View Post
    millennials were the kids of the 9/11 survivors.

  16. #696
    I Don't Work Here Endus's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Ottawa, ON
    Posts
    81,446
    Quote Originally Posted by tehdang View Post
    You're choosing to miss the point that you hold a great number of moral opinions on issues that affect others. Calling abortion special, like there's no possibility or debate on the other participant in the abortion, is asinine.
    The "other participant?". The doctor?

    You can't mean the fetus. I'm not going to entertain religious mythology as a valid argument for restricting women's rights. Religion is never a valid basis for legislation. Any such is religious subjugation of everyone who does not share that faith.

    And no; there is not a single argument about treating the fetus this way that does not boil down to a religious doctrine at some level.

    Spare me the lunacy of enraged religious bigots who seek to subjugate women into breeding livestock.


  17. #697
    The Lightbringer
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Look behind you.
    Posts
    3,734
    The biggest issue with these 'But the states tho!' arguments is that it's fundamentally flawed to give individual states power over civil rights legislation (And I found the right to an abortion as a 'Civil right' because it's an extension of one's bodily autonomy and very directly affects a specific demographic).

    Not everyone has the means or the opportunity to just pick and choose what states they want to live in, so getting unlucky in the game of 'which civil liberties will you be granted/denied in this plot of land!' just compounds the problem

  18. #698
    Merely a Setback Kaleredar's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    phasing...
    Posts
    26,630
    Quote Originally Posted by Xyonai View Post
    The biggest issue with these 'But the states tho!' arguments is that it's fundamentally flawed to give individual states power over civil rights legislation (And I found the right to an abortion as a 'Civil right' because it's an extension of one's bodily autonomy and very directly affects a specific demographic).

    Not everyone has the means or the opportunity to just pick and choose what states they want to live in, so getting unlucky in the game of 'which civil liberties will you be granted/denied in this plot of land!' just compounds the problem
    Again, it's all just a thin "justification" for unilaterally applying their own morality. And they will apply which laws they see fit, or don't see fit, in order to reinforce it.

    When states do things they don't like they are the first to clamor that the federal government should stop them. This was especially prevalent under Trump. Now that they control neither the Executive nor legislative branches, they're defaulting to the judicial branch to exert that control for them.
    “Do not lose time on daily trivialities. Do not dwell on petty detail. For all of these things melt away and drift apart within the obscure traffic of time. Live well and live broadly. You are alive and living now. Now is the envy of all of the dead.” ~ Emily3, World of Tomorrow
    Quote Originally Posted by Wells View Post
    Kaleredar is right...
    Words to live by.

  19. #699
    Quote Originally Posted by szechuan View Post
    BREAKING: Louisiana Republicans have voted HB 813 out of committee (7-2), defining a fertilized egg as a human. HB 813 makes abortion at any point a homicide, with no exception for minors, rape, incest, or ectopic pregnancies. This is beyond horrific.
    https://twitter.com/QasimRashid/stat...H3diqy7zg&s=19
    Religion is a mental illness.

  20. #700
    Quote Originally Posted by Evil Midnight Bomber View Post
    I'm just stating how ridiculous it is to put a 6 week clock on it. Discover your pregnant at 5.5 weeks and you have 3 days to decide if you want to keep it.
    ... not to mention scheduling an appointment.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •