If that's what you think my argument is, then you are way beyond bad faith here. I'd love to hear why you think my opinions are "dramatic" or "out of touch with reality". Whatever you may think, I honestly want to hear other stances on this, but I'm just not going to engage if you continue to strawman and insult my character without evidence. When you can learn to give me at least a little bit of respect we can continue if that's what you want.
The problem is that there is no transparency so there is no way to know outside of anecdotal reports. I'm pretty heavily against secrecy in rule/law enforcement regardless of where it is. I can say I've never seen the person in question ever be abusive in chats, even by pretty strict standards. I have more reason to believe they got muted for 2 weeks based on overzealous reporting than that they are secretly abusive in chat to other players. From what I understand WoW moderation is largely an automated process anymore, I'm unsure if these reports even get verified before punishment is dealt.
I'm actually shocked that you would post this in response while quoting me saying that freedom of speech is an ancient philosophical idea that was around for literally thousands of years before the US was an idea. I never used the first amendment as a reason, because that is about governmental regulation as you say, but the philosophy behind it (which is the same philosophy behind Democracy period) is indeed a potential factor. If you can't separate those two ideas in your head then I'm not sure how I can help you understand it better. What do you even think my argument is? I've clearly stated it so it should be obvious, but I'm really curious how much of it you absorbed or understood.