The person who immediately shifted to a bevy of ad hominems when challenged to actually substantiate statements like "minority opinions are required to be taken as gospel", "workplace DEI initiatives and NGO recommendations are the same thing as Jim Crow", "not being a judgmental asshole at work doesn't bode well for the future", and "acknowledging there's a power disparity between demographics in the context of assessing what constitutes hate speech is the same sort of thing that caused the Holocaust" is calling someone else bad faith poster, huh?
I'm feeling that the circus is intensifying in this Chili's tonight.
I thought that sometimes you need to be critical of someone's appearance?If you want to have a real conversation, then I'm down. Also, never call me habibi again, it's not cute and I don't consent.![]()