Calia Menethil, you stand accused by the community of being written in the story to take Sylvanas's place as leader of the Forsaken. To treat them as poor, unfortunate sheep in need of a shepherd to give them hope, and to use your family name as a source of unearned authority among the people of Lordaeron.
How do you plead?
Not guilty.
Throughout this new questline we see the understandable tentativeness from the Forsaken towards Calia Menethil. I know personally I always saw Lilian Voss as her polar opposite, reflecting the vengeful and dark cruelties that the Forsaken tend to embody, and that their collision in the story would end in bloodshed. But throughout this questline we see every major concern recognized. the "lightbound" resurrection, "necromancy is necromancy", just a different power source. Calia's willingness to work towards building a better future for the Forsaken by wading through that blight and going through hell (well, Maldraxxus) and back to prove herself despite no one believing in her, the name proving more of a hinderance to their trust than anything.
Bringing it all together with a moment I certainly was not expecting:
Finding common ground.
Calia Menethil of the line of Arthas who destroyed Lordaeron and unleashed the scourge upon it that would become their new twisted existence.
and
Lilian Voss, of the line of fanatical Scarlet Crusade undead hunters.
Both initially ran, but would ultimately find themselves among the Forsaken, working every day to carve out a new existence despite their histories during their time among the living.
A new living, together, as a council,
For The Forsaken!
(So takeaways/discussion: Do you agree that they successfully integrated Calia into the Forsaken story without redefining what "being Forsaken" is? Why or why not? How did you expect this Forsaken post-Sylvanas epilogue to go and do you think they left anything important out that still needs addressed?)