Ok, fair enough; I'll agree that we *can* change when a large enough lot stand firm on something.
The real question is, is this something we, as a people and species, will pursue?
Would the US really entertain this idea if its a huge moneymaker?
I mean, look at the other conversation floating around in here, but "Big Pharma" is essentially a privatized hostage situation where they say "oh, you have a life-threatening health issue? That's too bad. Here's something to help, but it will cost an arm and a leg when it barely cost us a bead of sweat on our brow".
If I was to rally the troops, as it were, and fight a social injustice and my choice was MTX or the exploitation of 300 million people, I'd lean on the latter and that hasn't changed in any real impactful way, aside from the other side of the predatory coin (insurance).
What I'm getting at is, there's far bigger fish that need to be dealt with first.
Also, comparing microtransactions in video games to women's rights or roe v wade is a bit... much.
I mean, yeah, MTX can lead to several bad situations, but like, a kid "accidentally" charging up 500 bucks on his dad's credit card versus a human being having agency over their own body?
See above re: bigger fish.