No, it's not.
The classic example from Ricardo was wine and cloth, I have also seen wheat and cloth used as example.
Guns&butter is used by http://econport.gsu.edu/content/hand...Advantage.html - but in contrast to other comparisons it seems weird (or basically Sloman had better examples than Coleman). First and foremost butter is consumed whereas guns aren't in a similar way. And the prices also differ - a new gun seems to cost 200$ or more, a pound of butter allegedly 3$-8$; indicating a larger difference in production costs than the example assumes.
Additionally it's not clear why one country would have an advantage in one or the other; the wine and cloth example was clearer on that side, especially when it was written, and currently out-sourcing labor-intensive work to China is similarly obvious.