ITT: A lot of sensitive snowflakes upset at inclusivity
ITT: A lot of sensitive snowflakes upset at inclusivity
Gay marriage was still illegal in much of the country in 2015. You aren't dealing with reality.
Why did trans issues suddenly become a big deal? Because conservatives started going after them with new laws. Trans people using the bathroom only became an issue when states started trying to pass laws about it, because conservatives were looking for a new culture war after they lost the one on gay people. If conservatives weren't trying to use the law to go after trans people, we wouldn't even be having this discussion.
whatever someone's personal position on these things, the reality is that a huge amount of liberal/left whatever you want to call it positions are unpopular even among democrats.
-gay marriage? popular
-trans rights? popular with a big * because it depends on specifics
-women in men's sports? unpopular
-defund the police? very unpopular
-changing school curriculums? very unpopular
-affirmative action? increasingly unpopular, especially among asian americans
If the term "liberal" means someone supports all these positions, you're looking at like <20% of the country. They aren't even unpopular among minority groups they claim to support.
A better way to think about Casual v Hardcore: https://www.mmo-champion.com/threads...asual-Hardcore
The actual tenets of defund the police poll exceptionally well. The slogan is unpopular.
"Changing the school curriculum" doesn't mean anything. Changing it to what?
Affirmative action is so wildly misunderstood that appealing to the public on it is difficult. Most people still think affirmative action calls for quotas, which has not been part of affirmative action for forty years due to court rulings.
It is relevant to Blizzard and the company, so I'd say yes. Generally I'm in favor of relaxed rules as long as people can discuss them without devolving into unproductive trolling/insulting, which is how most of those rules wound up there in the first place.
Edit: Like this one, man how did it get that bad in six pages?
Yes, your point?
So far the only other spell that has been renamed in the Classic beta was changed for that exact reason, thanks for establishing what i already said.
Well, because another Retail patch isn't due until DF pre patch and they're not going to hotfix this.
That's why you also don't have any of that social contract business in Classic right now but on the Wotlk Beta, that only comes in once they patch the client.
And if you're that big on thinking, then feel free to elaborate why a debuff in content that's not even relevant to Classic Wotlk was re named.
Especially, *just* in Classic Wotlk.
Last edited by Kralljin; 2022-07-15 at 03:43 PM.
Yes and we should continue protecting eachother, what's most important is that we protect those that aren't the same as us. And what's more important is that we bridge those gaps because we are inherently the same.
Alot of fear when one group is gaining power and they see another group as an enemy, and ofcourse in that "enemy" group of people there are true enemies, but most of those people are innocent and vulnerable and do not deserve to be cannon fodder in a war.
Oh, shameless pandering it is. Ironically this works against the people it's meant to serve. Especially trans people who identify as the opposite sex. So, instead of transwomen being women - it's now transwomen are body type 2. I can't imagine how erased that must make trans people feel.
The reasoning turns around and contradicts itself with the choice of pronouns. Either male and female exists or it doesn't. Not to mention how alienating this must be for anyone that identifies as male or female.
Last edited by Selah; 2022-07-15 at 03:50 PM.