Poll: I think..

This poll will close on 2024-11-04 at 06:42 PM Be advised that this is a public poll: other users can see the choice(s) you selected.

Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
LastLast
  1. #1

    Kamala Harris vs Trump/DeSantis

    If Biden decides not to run again in 2024 and steps down prior to the election making Kamala the President would you think she would win against DeSantis or Trump if either one received the nomination for President?

    Here's my projections for each one.

    Harris -- DeSantis



    Harris -- Trump



    Who do you think would win in this scenario?
    "You know you that bitch when you cause all this conversation."

  2. #2
    The Undying Cthulhu 2020's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Rigging your election
    Posts
    36,852
    "If Biden decides to not run again"

    So this is basically fantasy football but with political elections?
    2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
    2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"

  3. #3
    So AZ is just a blue state now? lol, okay I'm cool with that.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by TheramoreIsTheBomb View Post
    If Biden decides not to run again in 2024 and steps down prior to the election making Kamala the President would you think she would win against DeSantis or Trump if either one received the nomination for President?

    Here's my projections for each one.

    Harris -- DeSantis



    Harris -- Trump



    Who do you think would win in this scenario?
    You're making an assumption that if Biden Steps down Harris automatically becomes the Democratic Nominee. Newsom looks like he's positioning himself for a run at President.

    Also, no surpise you "projected" Trump over both Desantis and Harris to that extent.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Cthulhu 2020 View Post
    "If Biden decides to not run again"

    So this is basically fantasy football but with political elections?
    It's not really that outlandish of an idea though...Biden will be 81 (Turning 82) in 2024.
    Last edited by Evil Midnight Bomber; 2022-10-02 at 09:35 PM.
    “The biggest communication problem is we do not listen to understand. We listen to reply,” Stephen Covey.

  5. #5
    The Undying Cthulhu 2020's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Rigging your election
    Posts
    36,852
    Quote Originally Posted by Evil Midnight Bomber View Post
    It's not really that outlandish of an idea though...Biden will be 81 (Turning 82) in 2024.
    I have serious doubts. For one, everyone knows incumbents just have an easy time winning reelection (which is why it was so laughable that Trump lost). Everyone goes with a comfortable favorite over and "unknown" so even if he wanted to retire, there would be pressure from Democrats for him to stay another 4 years. If he dies, Harris is in charge. No super big change of leadership.

    We're also in war time. Yes, it's a proxy war, but Russia keeps saber rattling at the west for their involvement in Ukraine. Biden has been at the head of all this, and a change in leadership at the top for someone who's been dealing with the issue is not exactly the best thing to do, unless the public woefully disagrees with how the leader is handling it. But overall, if you ignore the Trumpians who blame everything on Biden, including stubbing their own toes, the majority of people generally approve of how the US is handling Ukraine. Namely, just giving tons of money and weapons.
    2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
    2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"

  6. #6
    Reforged Gone Wrong The Stormbringer's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Premium
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    ...location, location!
    Posts
    15,411
    Harris has no chance running solo, and I think she knows that. If Biden decides not to run again, there's no way in hell she's going to be on the Presidential ballot. Maybe as VP for whoever else runs, but not as President. She would have to be an absolute moron to do so.

  7. #7
    Herald of the Titans enigma77's Avatar
    5+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    EU
    Posts
    2,677
    the racist, wicked witch is deeply unpopular, including among Democrats

    in fact she's so deeply unpopular there's talk about removing her from the ticket as VP

  8. #8
    Herald of the Titans
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Dual US/Canada
    Posts
    2,599
    Posting a bunch of projections without explaining why you think some of the swing states will swing that way in each is kinda... not too useful. What makes Georgia more likely to go for Trump than Harris, but favor Harris over DeSantis for example? Results without reasoning is just arbitrary clutter.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Cthulhu 2020 View Post
    We're also in war time. Yes, it's a proxy war, but Russia keeps saber rattling at the west for their involvement in Ukraine. Biden has been at the head of all this, and a change in leadership at the top for someone who's been dealing with the issue is not exactly the best thing to do, unless the public woefully disagrees with how the leader is handling it. But overall, if you ignore the Trumpians who blame everything on Biden, including stubbing their own toes, the majority of people generally approve of how the US is handling Ukraine. Namely, just giving tons of money and weapons.
    Americans don't care about foreign policy also there's never been a time when the US wasn't at war in some way shape or form. The stance on Ukraine is pretty much bipartisan and out of the president's hands even Trump in all his Trumpiness could only slow things down.

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Cthulhu 2020 View Post
    I have serious doubts. For one, everyone knows incumbents just have an easy time winning reelection (which is why it was so laughable that Trump lost). Everyone goes with a comfortable favorite over and "unknown" so even if he wanted to retire, there would be pressure from Democrats for him to stay another 4 years. If he dies, Harris is in charge. No super big change of leadership.

    We're also in war time. Yes, it's a proxy war, but Russia keeps saber rattling at the west for their involvement in Ukraine. Biden has been at the head of all this, and a change in leadership at the top for someone who's been dealing with the issue is not exactly the best thing to do, unless the public woefully disagrees with how the leader is handling it. But overall, if you ignore the Trumpians who blame everything on Biden, including stubbing their own toes, the majority of people generally approve of how the US is handling Ukraine. Namely, just giving tons of money and weapons.
    He's also the oldest President ever and he might not feel up to Campaigning in 2024. And he'd have to campaign hard.
    “The biggest communication problem is we do not listen to understand. We listen to reply,” Stephen Covey.

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by enigma77 View Post
    the racist, wicked witch is deeply unpopular, including among Democrats

    in fact she's so deeply unpopular there's talk about removing her from the ticket as VP
    How is she racist?

  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by postman1782 View Post
    How is she racist?
    Going to guess that she said or did something "controversial" that the shitheels who pass for conservative pundits spun as racist in some pathetic attempt at a gotcha. Because...you know..."the Democrats are the real racists!!!" after all.

  13. #13
    Every time we've seen increased public exposure to Harris, public opinion of her drops. The only way she winds up as the nominee is if she is effectively unchallenged in a primary. I suppose that's possible, as the DNC does take something of a "your turn" approach to Presidential nominees. Nonetheless, those maps are far too friendly to someone that's about as compelling a speaker as a ham sandwich.

  14. #14
    Reforged Gone Wrong The Stormbringer's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Premium
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    ...location, location!
    Posts
    15,411
    Quote Originally Posted by postman1782 View Post
    How is she racist?
    Quote Originally Posted by s_bushido View Post
    Going to guess that she said or did something "controversial" that the shitheels who pass for conservative pundits spun as racist in some pathetic attempt at a gotcha. Because...you know..."the Democrats are the real racists!!!" after all.
    Wasn't it because she was pushing a lot of laws and stuff that primarily affected Black people back in California?

  15. #15
    Old God Milchshake's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Shitposter Burn Out
    Posts
    10,036
    Looks like the thread and similar posts were spurned on by the latest episode of Bill Maher's show. Which is usually blaming Dems for spending "too much time on civil rights IdPol!"
    Maher had on some of his regulars, Caitlan Flanagan and Van Jones.... shame that Bari Weiss couldnt make it. /s



    A celebrity case of the Obama>Sanders>Trump voter?

    • Basically, by supporting Obama that one time... Gives them carte-blanche to air out they bigotries/misogamy in perpetuity.
    • "demS haVE BetRayED mE ... because they're not focusing on my personal grievances!"

    How do you argue with poasters that use Bill Maher as a regular source of their information?
    Government Affiliated Snark

  16. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by The Stormbringer View Post
    Wasn't it because she was pushing a lot of laws and stuff that primarily affected Black people back in California?
    If I remember correctly tulsi destroyed her in a debate about it, not sure which one it was, when tulsi was running to be biden though

  17. #17
    I Don't Work Here Endus's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Ottawa, ON
    Posts
    79,180
    Quote Originally Posted by Spirit Halloween Voter View Post
    Looks like the thread and similar posts were spurned on by the latest episode of Bill Maher's show. Which is usually blaming Dems for spending "too much time on civil rights IdPol!"
    Maher had on some of his regulars, Caitlan Flanagan and Van Jones.... shame that Bari Weiss couldnt make it. /s

    A celebrity case of the Obama>Sanders>Trump voter?

    • Basically, by supporting Obama that one time... Gives them carte-blanche to air out they bigotries/misogamy in perpetuity.
    • "demS haVE BetRayED mE ... because they're not focusing on my personal grievances!"

    How do you argue with poasters that use Bill Maher as a regular source of their information?
    Apparently necessary reminder that Bill Maher's politics are comfortably Republican in basically every respect but weed legalization and being an atheist. He's a conservative whos views are primarily motivated through petty bigotries. He's regularly racist, homophobic, transphobic, and has opposed religious freedoms for most of his career. He's also generally uninformed as fuck and too arrogant to realize how ignorant he is, or willing to educate himself further on basically any topic he might be misinformed on. As a source of information, he's on the same frickin' tier as Joe Rogan.

    Which is unfair to Rogan, who freely admits he doesn't know shit about anything.


  18. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by The Stormbringer View Post
    Wasn't it because she was pushing a lot of laws and stuff that primarily affected Black people back in California?
    She was AG, not a legislator.

    The criticisms were over her prosecution of marijuana crimes while it was illegal, followed by her more recently laughing about whether she's smoked weed or not. As if the public opinion, and hers, has been unchanged for decades. Fair point her history isn't great on the topic, but as with a lot of politicians they've "evolved" over time and that's a good thing.

    And IIRC there was a death row case mishandled by her office.

    I remember this interview from back during the campaign - https://www.democracynow.org/2019/8/1/seg_2

    Which, while brief, IMO is a better take on her tenure as AG. Very much a mixed bag with some bad moves like her prosecution of weed crimes and her failure to prosecute Mnuchin that very obviously had negative downstream impacts, but also some good reforms and moves like dismissing charges against union protesters and building a civil rights division.

  19. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by The Stormbringer View Post
    Wasn't it because she was pushing a lot of laws and stuff that primarily affected Black people back in California?
    That's possible. The criticism is completely hollow when it comes from people who happily support laws like that anyway.

  20. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by molliewoof View Post
    If I remember correctly tulsi destroyed her in a debate about it, not sure which one it was, when tulsi was running to be biden though
    No, Tulsi is a fucking moron, she didn't destroy anyone.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •