1. #27221
    Quote Originally Posted by TeamWorldRevamp View Post
    Damn, the posting on this thread as slowed down dramatically in the last few days. It's either World Revamp or Bust at this point.
    It was raining today, so definitely world revamp is coming.

  2. #27222
    Quote Originally Posted by Foreign Exchange Ztudent View Post
    Definitely think that if there is a Revamp thing its a bait past-11.0/12.0 to keep people tied down while 11.0 runs its course.

    Unless again, Retail Team has pushed it aside to Classic+ and will stick to current Cosmic Storylines and the inevitable conclusion of the World Soul Extravangaza.
    It's amusing really. People have been saying:

    Revamp Next expansion! Trust me bro
    Tinker next expansion! Trust me bro

    ever since before the SL leaks started. And neither happened. And now suddenly we have to trust the drivel that it will really be next? It's adorable.

  3. #27223
    I've always seen Tinker as a meme tbh.

  4. #27224
    Quote Originally Posted by lanerios View Post
    It's amusing really. People have been saying:

    Revamp Next expansion! Trust me bro
    Tinker next expansion! Trust me bro

    ever since before the SL leaks started. And neither happened. And now suddenly we have to trust the drivel that it will really be next? It's adorable.
    The whole "We will return to Azeroth and while we were away, threat X has ravaged the continents!" that happens every expansion is funnny.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Terremer View Post
    most people underestimate wow 2, which could bring a breath of fresh air that's definitely needed

    and don't even get me started on the "yeah, but no, because people will never want to lose their entire collection"! personally, i don't give a shit about losing everything if it's just to get back on the right foot and experience a new adventure.

    however, i don't think Blizzard would take that risk, it's a AAA with no ambition
    WoW 2 means absolutely nothing.

    What's WoW 2? A whole different game, with different gameplay and barely connecting lore like Guild Wars 2?

    Good job. You are gonna lose your entire playerbase.

    Otherwise, it's just an expansion.

  5. #27225
    Guys....

    The revamp has always been happening slowly with blizz updating old textures and assets and creature models...

    That's a better use of time and resources.


    We're not gonna get another cata level revamp.

    They don't wanna make the same mistake they did with cata in that we'll lose the old world and content from it. And I seriously doubt they wanna manage cata world at the same time with this hypothetical revamp via bronze dragons.

    The reason why we needed cata was for two reasons.

    1) we needed flying in the old world.

    2) to refurbish the leveling experience for alts and new players.

    Since we obviously have flying already and the leveling has been further worked on with chromie time and ER then there's no reason to remake Kal and EK yet again.

    All we need is just all old school textures to be made into HD versions and that's it.

  6. #27226
    Merely a Setback Teriz's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Soul of Azeroth
    Posts
    29,054
    Quote Originally Posted by Xilurm View Post
    I've always seen Tinker as a meme tbh.
    Such a class is inevitable really. Whether it’s called a Tinker, Mechanic, Gearmaster, Mekgineer, Machinist, etc., such a class will be in WoW one way or another.

  7. #27227
    Quote Originally Posted by Well Done Steak View Post

    1) we needed flying in the old world.

    Cough Dragonriding Cough

  8. #27228
    Quote Originally Posted by Terremer View Post
    why not? Guild Wars 2 is an extremely popular mmo.
    and many others are inspired by GW2
    like dragonriding for example...
    Because GW2 is a completely different game from GW1 and a lot of people who enjoyed GW1 definitely did not enjoy GW2?

    Is it worth losing your core playerbase just to change things up for... reasons?

  9. #27229
    Quote Originally Posted by Xilurm View Post
    Cough Dragonriding Cough
    What about it?

    We're getting DR in the old world and you don't need to remake it for that.

    Only thing they needed to change was the view distance. You don't need to remake the world for that...

  10. #27230
    If WoW 2 is ever made it's probably going to be action oriented.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Well Done Steak View Post
    What about it?

    We're getting DR in the old world and you don't need to remake it for that.

    Only thing they needed to change was the view distance. You don't need to remake the world for that...
    Combine the zones so they are bigger.

  11. #27231
    Quote Originally Posted by Teriz View Post
    Such a class is inevitable really. Whether it’s called a Tinker, Mechanic, Gearmaster, Mekgineer, Machinist, etc., such a class will be in WoW one way or another.
    I like "Mech Pilot".

    I feel like Tinkers should solely exist as a mech class, to better coexist with engineering.

    I like to use iron man and war machine as an analogy.

    War machine is a tinker

    Iron man is a tinker and an engineer

    But you got to call it something other than tinker to make it work better. That's why I like "mech Pilot"
    Last edited by Well Done Steak; 2023-10-07 at 09:00 PM.

  12. #27232
    Quote Originally Posted by Xilurm View Post
    If WoW 2 is ever made it's probably going to be action oriented.

    - - - Updated - - -



    Combine the zones so they are bigger.
    There's no need for that. The world is the same size whether you take away zone borders or not

  13. #27233
    Quote Originally Posted by Terremer View Post
    if they're not stupid they'll have to do it indeed

    - - - Updated - - -



    losing one player base to another

    whatever they do, there will always be a player base
    WoW lags behind other mmo in many points, so this is an excellent reason to do it
    No. Losing chunks of one playerbase period.

    People who like WoW want to play WoW. Not WoW2.

    At best, they will keep playing WoW. But at that point you will have to work on two games at the same time.

    WoW lags behind other mmo in many points,
    Where, exactly?

    The only MMO that's even remotely (and remotely is VERY generous) close to WoW is FFXIV. And that's just as "outdated" as WoW in terms of engine and gameplay.

  14. #27234
    Quote Originally Posted by Well Done Steak View Post
    Guys....

    The revamp has always been happening slowly with blizz updating old textures and assets and creature models...

    That's a better use of time and resources.


    We're not gonna get another cata level revamp.

    They don't wanna make the same mistake they did with cata in that we'll lose the old world and content from it. And I seriously doubt they wanna manage cata world at the same time with this hypothetical revamp via bronze dragons.

    The reason why we needed cata was for two reasons.

    1) we needed flying in the old world.

    2) to refurbish the leveling experience for alts and new players.

    Since we obviously have flying already and the leveling has been further worked on with chromie time and ER then there's no reason to remake Kal and EK yet again.

    All we need is just all old school textures to be made into HD versions and that's it.
    If there is a world revamp, we dont have to lose it thanks to the zidormi mech that they didnt have back in cata so we could still explore zones as they are now

  15. #27235
    Quote Originally Posted by Terremer View Post
    it's terribly unambitious, just like the company
    No it's not....

    How are you gonna make like 25 zones into end game content?

    It's unneeded work when we have chromie time and ER if you're just thinking of new players.

  16. #27236
    Quote Originally Posted by xputurnameherex View Post
    If there is a world revamp, we dont have to lose it thanks to the zidormi mech that they didnt have back in cata so we could still explore zones as they are now
    Like I said in my post....

    You think blizz is seriously gonna manage effectively two kals and EK's....

    Again, the revamp is redundant. We don't need it.

    The entire point was for flying and updated leveling, which were good on both

  17. #27237
    11.0 speculation! Avaloren!

  18. #27238
    Quote Originally Posted by Terremer View Post
    it's actually essential

    the game isn't about to evolve with unambitious conservatives who find complacency in the slightest effort
    No it isn't.

    All it needs is a paint job, and that's what they're slowly doing...

    Cata was essential because the old world leveling was trash and we didn't have flying. That isn't the case anymore.


    Plus you can't make the entirety of Kal and EK endgame....


    New expansions means new lands to explore, not endgame westfall and desolace. Gtfo

    Even cata had new zones that essentially were cata's new "continent"

  19. #27239
    Scarab Lord Polybius's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Under Your Bed
    Posts
    4,394
    Quote Originally Posted by Well Done Steak View Post
    Like I said in my post....

    You think blizz is seriously gonna manage effectively two kals and EK's....

    Again, the revamp is redundant. We don't need it.

    The entire point was for flying and updated leveling, which were good on both
    Outlands says hi.

    If they're revamped they'll most likely be half-assed like Cata, or completely new like Draenor with updates to stories that were left with cliffhangers. The cliffhangers alone are reason enough to update them.
    Last edited by Polybius; 2023-10-07 at 09:17 PM.

  20. #27240

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •