

Its more that some people really really want them to be fake.
Vertical Fog(so its not the Legion client)
Plenty of new assets both textures and models
Nails the general artistic "tone" of modern Blizzard.
The first screenshot is taken mid animation for the text and its again done perfectly so either someone went through a lot of effort to fake mid animation text for no reason or....
This is just overall way too much effort for a fake of something this lame...it completely blows the Stormwind Harbor fake from years ago out of the water.
The only reason people doubt it at this point is because it points to another lame 4 Zone Island expansion.
I hope its fake and I'm wrong but this all reminds me way too much of Dracthyr leak.
Yeah and dont forget that "housing would cost a raid tier". Its a joke and honestly reminds me of Mojang and Minecraft.

I mean I know a lot of Servers do a lot of custom stuff and there's one thing building shit with GM Commands and another to just kind of Diablofy the WoW Experience properly (you know which one I'm talking about) and blow the established Class Systems wide open. But this just looks like something I'd legit just defect to. This is what a W feature trailer would be.

I want those screenshots to be fake and i see some iconsistences but at the same time Blizzard long time isnt 'when its ready' company to not expect blatant incompetency on their part even when it comes to announcement material.

Can I be mysterious too?
01010011 01110100 01101111 01110000 00100000 01100111 01101001 01110110 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01110100 01101000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01100111 01110101 01111001 00100000 01100001 01110100 01110100 01100101 01101110 01110100 01101001 01101111 01101110 00101110
Cosmic greetings, all, I'm the Raccoonatic Commander!
Leowyld of Emerald Dream-US
I personally hope the screenshots are fake, the landscapes look too sparse and there's no iconic landmarks there to draw you in. I know others have said the same, but I really can't feel myself being excited by them.
Keep in mind linking to/discussing private servers is still against forum rules, now that we've identified the source it is probably best to move on.
Yeah, let's not bring those shitshows of what people think are actual arguments once again back into this thread, please.


So...I actually got busy packing and errands today and wasn't able to keep up. Did I miss anything in the last 50 pages? I don't mind going through them but a tldr would be really nice to get as well.