


I really want a Tinker class but you're all huffing paint if you think a new class is going to fit in 10 talent points
The Druid ones shown were basically focus on treants or focus on moon spells. It doesn't magically change the class, it's a specialisation of a specialisation...
The Warrior one shown in the video makes subtle changes (ST ability now cleave) and new VFX, it doesn't change the core class into something completely different.
I'd roll a Tinker in a heartbeat but you all need to stop thinking a whole new class(es) will be added through this system


I hope they go full Suramar political intrigue with the Nerubians, they deserve it.

Which leak was it that originally mentioned the Earthen as a new race?

I think there's plenty to say in favor of the implicit "subclass" system at play here, anyway. Necromancer Warlocks, Warden Rogues, Dark Ranger Hunters etc. are on the table now, and I honestly think there's more new flavors opened up because of it than there ever would be with a single new class.

I'm very interested in warbands but how is it any different than just account wide everything??
Like visually, what is it? How does it differ than just logging on another toon?
Yeah, but if I wanna see my Hunter do Dark Ranger stuff but it's mathematically better to do a hero talent set that makes all my spells into void arrows I am gonna end up staring at an aesthetic I don't like every time I do a dungeon, y'know?
For clarity, I personally will likely be able to enjoy the aesthetics of whatever, it's just this is a precarious area that Blizzard have already messed up once, yknow?