For something to be confirmed it would need to be rumored first. This is just speculation at most.
I am not trying to be pedantic but let's not allow baseless speculation to become misinformation. You probably saw this somewhere else and assumed it real. We have a lot of posters in this forum and even this thread who insist on their speculation as if it was god given fact
Last edited by Nymrohd; 2024-03-24 at 10:52 PM.
A 12 months cycle is too short to have 3 raids and 4 seasons. But should be enough for 2 raids and 3 seasons, depending on complexity.
18 months is definitely the sweet spot when it comes to length for SL and DF sized expansions, but would create issues when it comes to consistent expansions launches, which might be an issue Blizzard doesnt want to risk.
The world revamp dream will never die!
from an interview:
World of Warcraft players are always hungry for more content, but even if Blizzard could hit its long-desired annualization goal, would that be appealing? Do players want an expansion every year? Or is the sweet spot somewhere in the middle — perhaps an 18-month break?
Hight and Longdale won’t tip Blizzard’s hand, but they say they’re using the company’s wealth of data about player behavior to try to pinpoint exactly what people want from content updates for the ongoing game.
“We don’t want to rush people to the next expansion,” Hight said. “But we also don’t want to drag things out longer than necessary
the 18 months thing is a guess
Legion prepatch was huge and you could level alts very easily. Dont remember SL prepatch event at all.
It was mostly killing dungeon and raid bosses that spawned on set timers in Northrend. Not all that interesting.
The Legion prepatch was great, but it's clear in hindsight that it was the exception, and not the new norm sadly.
- - - Updated - - -
Also, only one of the rares actually gave anything worth farming. That being the 34-slot bag from Bronjahm. Other than that there wasnt much reason to farm beyond getting the recoloured transmog and the haunted memento throwback.
The world revamp dream will never die!
I imagine it would be tiring to go back to old zones for the events when you were already busy in the Broken Isles with the new World Quests.
Also, you had plenty of quests that took you back to old zones to give the impression of the entire world being under attack, so I don't think you really lost the feeling of the Legion being everywhere.
The world revamp dream will never die!

That point in Plunderstorm when there is just three people left and you just look at each other cause whoever attacks first pretty much means the person not attacked wins the match . . .

I miss the Ion livestreams. When was the last time we had one? Early SL? Hope they bring them back for TWW.
Last edited by infinitemeridian; 2024-03-25 at 12:26 AM.
I'd prefer they just stick to a 2 year expansion cycle if the 4 seasons that comprise them were heftier. I don't know why everyone's acting like "smaller expansions, but they're also shorter" is an improvement. It's not. At blizzcon they basically announced Dragonflight was done, and at that point the expansion hadn't even been out a year. Plunderstorm is nice but it really is basically a different game.
I think they need to working on how to make a good conclusion to their expansion storyline & my big fear is that this Saga model is just going to do what Dragonflight did: Every expansion is just going to feel like the prologue to the next expansion.
Last edited by Ersula; 2024-03-25 at 01:11 AM.

Because conceptually, a shorter expansions means a more concentrated story and experience, rather than them trying to shove 1000 plotpoints into one expansion because one storythread can only carry an expansion for so long before it gets boring. You don't need an expansion to be 2 years long for it to tell a focused story.
Would BfA have 3-4 different main stories if it was a shorter expansion? Probably not. Would it have focused more on the Island/Faction War theme if it was shorter? Probably.
You don't realize how fickle the community is.