
Originally Posted by
JDBlou
You're aware this question reeks of bad-faith, right? It's false equivalence. There's no basis for treating all Hearthstone content as existing on the same canonical level, when there's clearly selective integration based on narrative utility.
The evidence shows Blizzard already has precedent for adopting specific Hearthstone elements into canon:
Visual designs (N'Zoth, Y'Shaarj)
New concepts (Tortollan)
Character additions (League of Explorers - Reno, Elise, Finley didn't exist before Legion)
You're using the most "hearthstone wacky energy" examples (star fighters) to dismiss the entire premise while ignoring documented cases of successful integration.
The reality is nuanced - Team 2 take ideas from Hearthstone and adapt them to fit established canon when they serve the story or expansion of worldbuilding. It's selective adoption, not wholesale importing of every card concept including the deliberately silly ones.
Your logic is like saying "If concept cars influence production vehicles, why don't we all drive flying cars?" - you're conflating experimental features with practical innovations that actually get implemented.
The question isn't whether everything from Hearthstone becomes canon, but whether specific elements can be meaningfully integrated when they enhance the broader narrative. The question is if AND when it's integrated.