I would say that's a little after around 2012issh maybe 2013, and then by 2016 it progressed to the hero shooter... and around 2018 to 2019 was the popularity around the Battle Royale.
- - - Updated - - -
...Wouldn't Dungeons and Dragons sue Blizzard at that point if that was the case?
Also kinda weird that there isn't any connection between the Niffen and Kobolds. I don't mean like they're related, I mean like if they're friendly or not with the Kobolds.
With metzen back how much of the 5E RPG book he made is going to sneak into wows lore?
Anyone read this before? Auroboros: Coils of the Serpent: Worldbook - Lawbrand RPG https://a.co/d/1bR38WU
The Beholder in D&D vs the WoW one is different in that a Beholder has eyes at the end of each tentacle.. while the WoW version just has the one eye and multiple tentacles.. even the older WoW version had one big eye and several mini eyes around the body.
The closest we have to what D&D kobolds look like are the Draknoid Hatchlings.. like that one battle pet you'd get if you pre-ordered Dragonflight. Which already have the Goblin's model skeleton.. so they'd have to make a variant that is more reptilian and less dragon looking.
Spoiler:
That’s actually a very good point. Being that it is tech based and brand new, it could easily fill any role they wanted it too. Hell, they could even make it involve music if they wanted to appease the bard people. (I hope they don’t…) That class could easily fill melee or ranged dps, tanking, healing, or support dps depending on how it was designed. And if they DO indeed go underground, and involve more Goblins and Dwarves and (hopefully(personally)) Gnomes, it’s a really really solid possibility the class gets added with it after years and years of fans talking about it.
Also very possible they never add that class because of the controversy ha.
As I understand it WotC (or Hasbro I guess? WotC in the past at least) was pretty litigious with anything close to it but fair enough. And I admit my own ignorance in things as I just kinda figured kobolds in general were draconic to some degree but a wiki dive has since told me I'm very much wrong and kobolds are honestly pretty varied with versions of them being just kinda gremlins, small human-like sprites, their names were apparently the root for goblins even, and even some canine-like ones (those seem to be the version Japan prefers which are derived from Record of Lodoss War which themselves are derived from earlier D&D versions).
So yeah, seems I'm mistaken.
...still want my draconic goblins though.
All I ever wanted was the truth. Remember those words as you read the ones that follow. I never set out to topple my father's kingdom of lies from a sense of misplaced pride. I never wanted to bleed the species to its marrow, reaving half the galaxy clean of human life in this bitter crusade. I never desired any of this, though I know the reasons for which it must be done. But all I ever wanted was the truth.
They cannot sue over kobolds because kobolds were part of the Open Gaming License and its successor texts and were never copyrights. After all most D&D monsters have to some extent a basis in real world myths so Hasbro or previous owners would never have been allowed to establish a copyright on them. And as said, even if they could they waived that right when they included them in the SRD or other similar texts. Beholders and Mind Flayers are a different case (were never under an open license) and Blizzard has to an extent used both which suggests that Hasbro is not interested.
I know the thread drifted a bit from the speculation stuff, but now that we're nearly 30 days away from the announcement if I had to bet into something, I would go with this:
Sadly, no Revamp again, my fellow world revampers. Maybe next time?!
Only another two years or so will tell...
I only hope 11.0 will not have a Master Voidlord, who was behind everything void-related stuff that happened since "only God knows when", if you know what I mean.
Pretty much, I recall the newcomers being part of the reason for easier, streamlined content (i.e. Cata Heroic nerfs). It can be interpreted many ways so I wouldn't place much weight into it. Legion was one of the better expansions and it likely never reached WoW's peak numbers. Likewise, other games have never reached these metrics, doesn't mean they're terrible.
I wouldn't take it TOO seriously.
It's Gnome/Goblins used as comedic relief as a reference to this ad for the NE/Undead heritage armour.
Because they are short. (But some people might argue that Gnome/Goblins are not used for comedic relief!)