
Originally Posted by
Marlamin
I'm saying it is a huge stretch to use it a mount as one of your pieces of 'evidence' for being an 11.0 tease when it was;
- Added in Shadowlands
- Made at the same time (Nov 2021 or earlier) as the regular snow elemental creature that shares most of its textures (all but 1, probably the armor) and sounds
- Added around the same time as Dragonflight pre-order rewards
- Likely meant for the BlizzCon in the following year
I'm not saying it can't or won't be an elemental expansion, I have no hard dataminable evidence pointing either way, noone in this thread does, I'm just saying it is silly to treat something added in 9.2 as a hint/basis for an 11.0 theory. They don't add stuff that far in advance and when they reuse something that old it is almost always, if not always, because the original reason it was added didn't pan out (e.g. BlizzCon 2022).
I mean, they still have the "BlizzCon Collection" (the artist formerly known as the Virtual Ticket) announcement coming up, it's likely just for that. And again, no way it could have been made as an intentional hint for an 11.0 announcement.
Regardless of what 11.0 happens to be, if your theory is "they used the only unused non-Dragonflight encrypted mount that happens to be an elemental for the virtual ticket to tease 11.0 because it fits with my suspicions of what 11.0 is", then by all means go for it but definitely don't go around calling that "evidence".
- - - Updated - - -
I've talking about this with one of the mods before, I don't think it would work because you'd have several people discussing different leaks with very hard to follow quote threads. Maybe a subforum would suffice, but then this thread would be in danger of stepping both inside "real world" and "speculation" subforums which right now is covered by only one subforum. Might be a discussion I pick back up before 12.0, though.