Vast majority of some horde players on a small independent forum.
It's highly unlikely to be a lot.
Not a lot of people pick the bad guy options in games.
Like how in Mass Effect over 90% of players picked Paragon options instead of Renegade.

Normally it takes an argument longer to devolve into calling each other nazis. Anyway since you asked, while he is generally more logical than most, he does come off as a pretentious twat who twists his own words just so he could say 'I'm right and you are wrong'. Sure he is no Pyromancer but during his streams he does sure love to trigger people on purpose just so that he could argue with them and flaunt his supposed superiority,
Is the “new” source that book from Warcraft 3/classic that they copied and then had some one in universe scribble in?
If it’s just that it’s seem unlikely there will be any actual influence of an old retconned book just because it says five and because it’s technically in universe there’s no reason to think who ever wrote it actually had first hand information and would think G’hunn wasn’t an actual old god or know Y’shaarj got killed leading to them likely being part of the five.
Evil only wins when it spreads. It can cause destruction, it can cause death—but those are consequences of its nature, not its victory. Not its goal. The danger of evil, the purpose of evil, is that it causes those who would oppose it to become evil also.
Huh, good point. With Y'Shaarj dead and Xal'Atath potentially eaten, there's room for two Old Gods we haven't met yet. The only issue with that is that we've already seen their territory established in Chronicles, with no room for any others—then again, this is Blizzard, and "past lore is constraining" on Danuser's wild ride. Alternatively, they could have been off the main continent. Maybe they're in Avaloren?
Then again, the text is supposed to be flawed and evidently biased in-universe, so this may just be a red herring.
Yeah that is the one. The thing is, as the video points out, the annotations take great pleasure in correcting the titans whenever they make a mistake. But they don't correct the number of imprisoned Old Gods even though the POV is working for them.
Yes, pretty much. The book even says that the Titans just swept things that couldn't be ordered, under the rug. The Chronicle is Titan lore and open for interpretation. This lead to some weird theories over the years, like Pyromancer's claim that the Titans are the actual Void Lords.
- - - Updated - - -
Believe it or not, I haven't even heard of the Quartering before you brought it up. But keep being judgemetnal, dude. Real classy.
Now I don't watch much of his streams, because all the petty arguments for no reason irk, me, but one i clearly remember was during his Shadowbringer playthrough.
TL;DR quick paraphrased version.
Taly: I hate this guy so much.
Chat: Why? He is such a well-written character.
Taly: Ahh you dumb people don't understand. When I say I hate him, I clearly mean I like him, but my character has no reason to like him. Haha, fools.
He also seems to be inconsistent when complaining about overly sexualized characters or races. The same thing can be just simply sexy in one race, but overly sexualized in others.
I mean they DID imprison Y'shaarj. They imprisoned his heart. Which still leaves one Old God if we are not counting G'huun.

Sometimes, the light of the moon is a key to other spaces. I've found a place where, for a night or two, the streets curve in unfamiliar ways. If I walk here, I might find insight, or I might be touched by madness.
This book as far as we know isn’t written by the titans and as we know from Chronicles which is there perspective they only egknowledged 4 old gods so even if they were trying to correct the titans at every turn they would have no reason to touch the number.
And if we are to assume the original book in IF was written by an mortal then 5 fits perfectly if you put in G’hunn and who ever is correcting it could just not know G’hunn isn’t a real old god like who ever originally wrote it.
Evil only wins when it spreads. It can cause destruction, it can cause death—but those are consequences of its nature, not its victory. Not its goal. The danger of evil, the purpose of evil, is that it causes those who would oppose it to become evil also.