Evokers can equip 1h and 2h Axes, Swords, and Maces. Being able to use 2h weapons is weird for a caster class. Perfectly possible for the third spec to use 2h weapons.
I also took Ion’s meaning of “frostbolt” to be similar to “fireball” in that it’s a generic term for an frost magic projectile. The Blue Dragonflight is capable of utilizing frost-based magic.
Ion's statement was in the context of a question about future race/class combos.
Here's the full summary:
So no, it's not about a third fucking spec.Class Race Combos
They want to make sure there are narrative reasons for races to become classes. But gameplay-wise they are trying to open up more race-class combos, after they take story for narrative continuity.
There is a high likelyhood down the line that Dracthyr can wield weapons and cast Frostbolts.
Formerly known as Arafal
Which doesn’t really mean anything. If there is a third spec that does that, and someone asks him about his comments above, he’ll simply point to the third spec and say “ there you go!” Because it’s doing exactly what he described.
There’s WAY too many technical issues for Dracthyr to get more classes. People are complaining about transmog now on Evokers. Imagine Dracthyr Warriors dealing with shield, armor, or weapon clipping. Dracthyr can’t wear cloaks outside of Visage form for a reason.
Dracthyr getting more classes is one of those things you think you want, but you really don’t.
Last edited by Teriz; 2023-04-09 at 01:27 PM.
Nope, sorry but that context means everything.
He was asked a question about future race class combos and he gave his answer, which can be summed up as "Yes, just not right now".
You being completely incapable of understanding that simple interaction, does not make it mean anything else.
I don't have to imagine it, i can just open the wowhead dressing room or the in-game dressing room, preview a Dracthyr with a shield and any weapon 1h and then select an animation.Imagine Dracthyr Warriors dealing with shield, armor, or weapon clipping.
Turns out they already got all the animations that they need, and there are no clipping issues whatsoever.
Yes, and people are going to continue to complain about it regardless, as that's an issue with their model design.People are complaining about transmog now on Evokers.
Dracthyr can’t wear cloaks outside of Visage form for a reason.
That does not, however, prevent them from gaining access to other classes, it's completely irrelevant to the discussion.
Dracthyr getting more classes is one of those things you think you want, but you really don’t.
Formerly known as Arafal
You’re delusional if you genuinely think that him saying Dracthyr will/could get more classes down the line means Evoker is getting a third spec.
Besides, they’ve even started adding the animations for other classes already. On the PTR Dracthyr are now rigged for Mage, Priest, Warlock, and Paladin animations.
(And previously they’ve already had most of not all all the animations for Rogue, Warrior, and Hunter.)
Blizzard put themselves in a position where they now have several extra years to work on rigging proper armor to Dracthyr.There’s WAY too many technical issues for Dracthyr to get more classes. People are complaining about transmog now on Evokers.
Maybe they wanted the extra time to fine tune the rigging and make it not look so bad.
It’s not an impossible task.
If only blizzard thought of this and made it so 2H weapons and anything that goes on your back like some offhands are hidden in Dracthyr form.Imagine Dracthyr Warriors dealing with shield, armor, or weapon clipping.
Oh wait it’s already a thing.
Which is my point; we have images of Emberthal, an Evoker, using a polearm/halberd. The third spec is based on Emberthal and whatever she could do before they went into stasis. Seems rather cut and dry.
If you take what he’s saying literally, sure. However, he could be saying that you’re going to see Dracthyr wielding weapons and tossing around frost bolts, just not in the way you think.And no, that's not a valid interpretation. That's like trying to argue "nuclear submarine" could refer to an atom below a ship.
Because as it stands now, the only playable Dracthyr are Evokers.
- - - Updated - - -
Again, him saying that Dracthyr wielding weapons and using frostbolt =\= Dracthyr are getting more classes. Especially when the Evoker class is highly likely to get those attributes in the very near future.
Where’s the image of the shield sheathed to the back? Also how is visage form going to work in other classes? Will you stay in visage form regardless of ability, or do you switch into dracthyr form based on what ability you do?I don't have to imagine it, i can just open the wowhead dressing room or the in-game dressing room, preview a Dracthyr with a shield and any weapon 1h and then select an animation.
Turns out they already got all the animations that they need, and there are no clipping issues whatsoever.
I believe it does, since it’s going to be a consistent ask and technical issue thar Blizzard will have to deal with if they do this. If they don’t do it, they won’t have the headache.Yes, and people are going to continue to complain about it regardless, as that's an issue with their model design.
That does not, however, prevent them from gaining access to other classes, it's completely irrelevant to the discussion.
- - - Updated - - -
You're delusional if you think he actually meant that, and wasn't engaging in typical Blizzard dev doublespeak.
You're not going to fix the issue unless you redo every piece of WoW armor in 3D. They're not going to do that just so 1% of the WoW population can play as a Dracthyr Warrior or Rogue.Blizzard put themselves in a position where they now have several extra years to work on rigging proper armor to Dracthyr.
Maybe they wanted the extra time to fine tune the rigging and make it not look so bad.
It’s not an impossible task.
Yeah, because if there's one thing warriors like is not being able to see their armor and not being able to see weapons sheathed on their back. You honestly believe that a Warrior player is going to enjoy playing a half naked dracthyr whose weapons magically pop out of their hands every time they attack?If only blizzard thought of this and made it so 2H weapons and anything that goes on your back like some offhands are hidden in Dracthyr form.
Oh wait it’s already a thing.
No.
It means that Dracthyr will get normal classes. Like Mages. You know, the class with Frostbolt.
We have an interview with Ion saying
In a different interview, he saysNow as they emerge in Azeroth and integrate with the Alliance and Horde over time, could they learn to pick up an axe and be a great warrior, quite possibly, but that's not where their story is starting in Dragonflight.
Then we have a recent interview sayingNow as they emerge from that stasis as they integrate into societies that join the Alliance and the Horde and spread throughout the world, could they come to learn how to practice some of the arts of other classes? Is there anything stopping them from learning how to pick up a sword and hit you with it? Not necessarily. That's not where we our story is starting. But it's definitely a space that's open to explore nonetheless.
We also have the developers working on adding the other class animations to Dracthyr.There is a high likelyhood down the line that Dracthyr can wield weapons and cast Frostbolts.
I dunno how you can take that and twist it into "3rd spec". I highly doubt your Earth-based tank fanfiction spec is gonna cast Frostbolts.
Last edited by Makorus; 2023-04-09 at 02:16 PM.
They also previously specifically said they could “learn how to bladestorm”.
Unless they’re going to make an Evoker spec that involves fighting in Melee/bladestorming and throwing frostbolts… ion’s very clearly talking about warrior/mage.
Which makes sense given how Dracthyr are now rigged with all warrior and mage animations. (As well as Rogue, Paladin, Warlock, Hunter and Priest.)
Clearly you don’t know how armor rigging/design works in WoW.You're not going to fix the issue unless you redo every piece of WoW armor in 3D. They're not going to do that just so 1% of the WoW population can play as a Dracthyr Warrior or Rogue.
They didn’t have to go and redo every single piece of WoW armor in 3D for Kul Tirans, who were using a new skeleton/rig. And if they did, then clearly it’s a pretty easy task.
Besides, Dracthyr would at a minimum retain their barber shop armor.
Maybe blizzard could add some new barber shop options for plate/leather/cloth wearers if they don’t want to put in the work to rig transmog armor.
Almost as if someone who decides to play a Dracthyr warrior would be well aware of the fact that their weapons can be hidden.Yeah, because if there's one thing warriors like is not being able to see their armor and not being able to see weapons sheathed on their back.
You honestly believe that a Warrior player is going to enjoy playing a half naked dracthyr whose weapons magically pop out of their hands every time they attack?
Because a third spec solves those asks without the technical issues that would dog Blizzard for years.
Giving Dracthyr to other classes sounds great, until you really think about the myriad problems associated with it.
Also it should be noted that there's plenty of things Blizzard has "thought about doing" that never come to fruition.
- - - Updated - - -
It's quite possible.
So you're saying that Blizzard is going to make ANOTHER Dracthyr skeleton in place of the current one just so that they can play other classes? Why didn't they do that in the first place if giving them other classes was their future goal?Clearly you don’t know how armor rigging/design works in WoW.
They didn’t have to go and redo every single piece of WoW armor in 3D for Kul Tirans, who were using a new skeleton/rig. And if they did, then clearly it’s a pretty easy task.
Besides, Dracthyr would at a minimum retain their barber shop armor.
Maybe blizzard could add some new barber shop options for plate/leather/cloth wearers if they don’t want to put in the work to rig transmog armor.
As for Barbershop options in the place of transmog armor, again we have wide community complaints now JUST on Evokers. Imagine other classes complaining about not being able to see their precious looted armor in Dracthyr form.
C'mon now. We both know that's not how your typical WoW player thinks. The first day this goes live there will be 100 posts on the official forums asking why they can't see their sheathed weapons on their Dracthyr warrior.Almost as if someone who decides to play a Dracthyr warrior would be well aware of the fact that their weapons can be hidden.
Last edited by Teriz; 2023-04-09 at 02:28 PM.
Can you not derail every thread with your obsessions?
Looks like a bunch of warriors to me.
Nobody ever said they’d make a new skeleton for Dracthyr.So you're saying that Blizzard is going to make ANOTHER Dracthyr skeleton in place of the current one just so that they can play other classes? Why didn't they do that in the first place if giving them other classes was their future goal?
There’s nothing with the current model that makes it impossible to rig armor to.
Then it sounds like the perfect fix is to rig armor to Dracthyr. Which they’re probably planning on doing when they add new classes.As for Barbershop options in the place of transmog armor, again we have wide community complaints now JUST on Evokers. Imagine other classes complaining about not being able to see their precious looted armor in Dracthyr form.
I simply said one throw away line and a group of posters swarmed me with their desire for a Dracthyr class. I'm merely responding to the swarm.
- - - Updated - - -
Emberthal isn't a warrior.
Except those massive wings which prevent proper weapon/shield sheathing, and cloaks. Along with the dracthyr head which causes massive clipping issues with helmets.Nobody ever said they’d make a new skeleton for Dracthyr.
There’s nothing with the current model that makes it impossible to rig armor to.
Are they going to rig old armor to dracthyr as well? What about weapons? Again I highly doubt you're going to get a ton of warrior players feeling immersed in their character when their weapons appear out of nowhere every time they enter combat.Then it sounds like the perfect fix is to rig armor to Dracthyr. Which they’re probably planning on doing when they add new classes.
Sometimes, the light of the moon is a key to other spaces. I've found a place where, for a night or two, the streets curve in unfamiliar ways. If I walk here, I might find insight, or I might be touched by madness.
And those Dracthyr aren’t Evokers.
Weapons/shields will be hidden as said.Except those massive wings which prevent proper weapon/shield sheathing, and cloaks. Along with the dracthyr head which causes massive clipping issues with helmets.
Helmets are a nonissue. If Tauren and Worgen can wear helmets, so can Dracthyr.
Weapons are already rigged, especially ones arms/fury warriors would use, so I fail to see the point you’re trying to make there.Are they going to rig old armor to dracthyr as well? What about weapons? Again I highly doubt you're going to get a ton of warrior players feeling immersed in their character when their weapons appear out of nowhere every time they enter combat.
And again, you know nothing about how armor rigging works for new races.
They didn’t have to manually go and rig every piece of armor for Kul Tirans and they don’t have any clipping issues.
Emberthal is, and she's standing there holding a bladed weapon.
If they're a non-issue, why can't Dracthyr wear standard helmets currently?Weapons/shields will be hidden as said.
Helmets are a nonissue. If Tauren and Worgen can wear helmets, so can Dracthyr.
In the model viewer, have the Dracthyr dual wield 2h weapons, and then have them sheathe. Enjoy the hilarity that ensues.Weapons are already rigged, especially ones arms/fury warriors would use, so I fail to see the point you’re trying to make there.
Because they designed Kul Tirans to be different classes. They never designed Dracthyr for that purpose. Which is why you continuously ignore the issue with Visage forms and how they work with non-Evoker classes, since Visage forms were designed with Evoker and Evoker-only in mind.And again, you know nothing about how armor rigging works for new races.
They didn’t have to manually go and rig every piece of armor for Kul Tirans and they don’t have any clipping issues.
Also please don't bring up animations being present as proof. Goblins and Worgen had Monk animations for 11 years and they didn't get Monks until a month ago. And that's with NO technical issues involved.
- - - Updated - - -
Okie dokie.
I'll let them have the last word.
You don't seem to have a problem with brainlessly defending a completely absurd position, either. Your argumentation is literally Flat-Earther level blatant ignorance of any proper rules of logic and discussions and twisting of facts with no regard of how completely unworkable your interpretation is.