1. #39701
    Quote Originally Posted by Baraden View Post
    Do we know what world the wandering isle actually exists in? Like is it hidden on the pandaria map somewhere the same way eversong woods/azuremyst are really hidden on the outlands map
    It is on its own separate map.

    Quel'thalas and Azuremyst exists on Outland map only because how they hmarked expanion content back then. They locked outland map away from accounts without teh expansion, thus the two new starting zones exist on that map.

  2. #39702
    Quote Originally Posted by graysontum View Post
    Im hoping for no leaks at all this year, but that seems pretty impossible for Blizzard.
    SL really didn't leak much. We got the name and logo, the bolvar, and the blurb about bastion.

    As far as I can remember we had absolutely nothing on the actual story context, the features, etc.

  3. #39703
    The Undying Teriz's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Undermine
    Posts
    34,134
    Quote Originally Posted by Well Done Steak View Post
    It's the calm before the storm.... Can you feel it Mr Krabs?
    Indeed. Just so no one tries to attack me for it later; While I think the "Soul of Azeroth" leak is the most likely, an expansion featuring Avaloren is (unfortunately) possible as well. I'm hoping for one to be true, but dreading the possibility of the other being true instead. We'll know soon enough..

  4. #39704
    Quote Originally Posted by keelr View Post
    Ahaha this time the Tinker discussion got so heated it even summoned a mod.
    That 40,000 post count is how many tinker threads they've had to stop this year

  5. #39705
    Quote Originally Posted by matijwow View Post
    Maybe I'd base it on the optional Founding of Durotar campaign, but I never played those missions so I don't know what happens in them. Art for it does use Thrall's old armor, though.
    I'd say "you need to," it's spectacular, but it's pretty much permanently tainted if you ever played WC3 online and had it updated thanks to the movement to Reforged's awful god damn client/data.

    One of my favorites, though. I get why they couldn't stay that way forever for story reasons, but I miss that iteration of the Horde. Still angry we can't get Ogres/Mok'nathal in the vein of how sexy the new Rexxar is.

  6. #39706
    Soul of Azeroth as far as I know isn't a leak, someone just jokingly threw a name into the ring.

  7. #39707
    hello guys , my first post here

    so the moment is coming , and for you , what is the correct leak ?

    also , can somemone post the leak drive ,its to me to see it better

  8. #39708
    Quote Originally Posted by Nymrohd View Post
    Ion specifically said in an interview they would NOT be changing existing specs into support but might consider adding more specs.

    - - - Updated - - -



    Now I cannot unsee that. Oh wait maybe we should make a gryphon that is half lion, half sea gull!

    - - - Updated - - -



    I do think Classic+ would generate more hype than an expac that is just 4 zones, 8 dungeons and a raid. The retail expac would need some big feature to compare.

    Though I still have no idea what Classic+ is and given how different the opinions are, neither does the community.
    Watcher also said the ripcord didn't exist and they wouldn't open the covenants

    He also said we got intro skips because experiencing the story once was ok THEN said we couldn't skip the maw intro because we were supposed to experience the story on each character.


    He also said trials didn't get loot in ML systems

  9. #39709
    Imagine if they won't announce a new expansion at this Blizzcon lol.

    And two months later, just like FromSoft, they will announce it in a random tweet

  10. #39710
    Quote Originally Posted by Teriz View Post
    Indeed. Just so no one tries to attack me for it later; While I think the "Soul of Azeroth" leak is the most likely, an expansion featuring Avaloren is (unfortunately) possible as well. I'm hoping for one to be true, but dreading the possibility of the other being true instead. We'll know soon enough..
    Hey Teriz what is it you don't like about Avaloren?

  11. #39711
    Quote Originally Posted by Arcinatoss View Post
    I played sub rogue a lot in WoD I enjoyed multristrike a lot. shame they got rid of that and kept the more boring versatility.
    Readiness and cleave were killed too soon

  12. #39712
    Quote Originally Posted by Al Gorefiend View Post
    Hey Teriz what is it you don't like about Avaloren?
    It's not underground and thus tangentially connected to Undermine, therefore not satisfying his spectrum-y hyperfixation.

    There will be paragraphs and pages of "logical" reasoning as to how that's not the case, but it's mental gymnastics for wishful thinking like basically everyone else.

  13. #39713
    They will and teamrevamp will be very happy!

  14. #39714
    I for one welcome our orc-sized rock dwarf overlords

  15. #39715
    It's not technically a public event, but I hope we see a more fleshed out form of the Cobalt Assembly grind in 11.0. I enjoyed that a lot and think WoW could use more somewhat mindless grinds that aren't totally mandatory in contrast to the "wait and hunt for rares" loop.

  16. #39716
    Quote Originally Posted by graysontum View Post
    Im hoping for no leaks at all this year, but that seems pretty impossible for Blizzard.
    The Algarian Stormrider (and possibly Squally) already leaked, so we're already beyond no leaks at all. But yeah, it would be nice if that remained the only leaks especially because it's a relatively low-impact leak.
    Last edited by Samin; 2023-10-29 at 08:13 PM.
    Samin
    Quote Originally Posted by Ashrana View Post
    So, what would be your reaction, if you found out, that come cata release first patch, blizzard were planning to kill everyone by sending a bear through the mail?

  17. #39717
    Quote Originally Posted by Neoplanet View Post
    hello guys , my first post here

    so the moment is coming , and for you , what is the correct leak ?

    also , can somemone post the leak drive ,its to me to see it better
    For me I would argue no widely seen leak is real besides the confirmed one that said the name of the collector's edition mount.
    If a leak is true besides that, then it's one that hasn't gained much traction.
    The world revamp dream will never die!

  18. #39718
    Quote Originally Posted by Teriz View Post
    Indeed. Just so no one tries to attack me for it later; While I think the "Soul of Azeroth" leak is the most likely, an expansion featuring Avaloren is (unfortunately) possible as well. I'm hoping for one to be true, but dreading the possibility of the other being true instead. We'll know soon enough..
    Please link to that leak, and not just "because I posted the name bro"

  19. #39719
    Quote Originally Posted by Samin View Post
    The Algarian Stormrider (and possibly Squall) already leaked, so we're already beyond no leaks at all. But yeah, it would be nice if that remained the only leaks especially because it's a relatively low-impact leak.
    What is Squall?

  20. #39720
    The Undying Teriz's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Undermine
    Posts
    34,134
    Quote Originally Posted by Al Gorefiend View Post
    Hey Teriz what is it you don't like about Avaloren?
    It's a departure from known locations in WC lore and history. Seems more like an asspull than a legitimate location for an expansion.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •