1. #46881
    Quote Originally Posted by justwatching View Post
    The Backgrounds are very obviously AI generated and look nothing like wows engine you dont really need to go further than that. Its stupidly low effort(didnt even get the text colors correct) and it probably took all of 10 mins to make.

    Also Blizzard is never going to call an expansion "oathbreaking".
    I've seen a lot of AI generated images and I can tell you, these aren't done with AI. An AI can make small mistakes like trees warping..

    To me, as of now, this is the most legitimate leak.

  2. #46882
    Quote Originally Posted by justwatching View Post
    Yeah a bit cause they used legit images to train the model...but the point is not about the artstyle you can just tell that its not in-engine.
    Really don't get that vibe from them, but we'll see, won't we

  3. #46883
    The Unstoppable Force Chickat's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Orgrimmar
    Posts
    20,829
    Quote Originally Posted by Woke it Up View Post
    I can't see Avaloren without thinking about Loreal / avalon
    Like the hair color brand?

  4. #46884


    Background feels like it really isn't in-game warcraft tbh

  5. #46885
    Quote Originally Posted by Woggmer View Post
    I've seen a lot of AI generated images and I can tell you, these aren't done with AI. An AI can make small mistakes like trees warping..

    To me, as of now, this is the most legitimate leak.
    An AI trained on WoW zone screenshots could reproduce this. The fact that there are no creatures or mobs interacting with the environment don't feel right to me imo

  6. #46886
    Quote Originally Posted by Moth Preacher View Post


    Background feels like it really isn't in-game warcraft tbh
    It kind of does, it feels like titan stuff with shit covering it. That screenshot in particular looks like the forest from the original leak.

  7. #46887
    tel'abim and lost isles here we come

  8. #46888
    Quote Originally Posted by Moth Preacher View Post


    Background feels like it really isn't in-game warcraft tbh
    It feels like one of those hyper realistic UE5 versions of a warcraft zone thats been passed through a filter to try and soften the images

  9. #46889
    Just saying, leak images are focusing on system & feature videos. But since Shadowlands & Dragonflight showed intro cinematics first. It seems the new way to go, and so I'll be sceptic of them. Anyway, we are so close... And I am ready to see what is true.

  10. #46890
    Warchief Catastrophy349's Avatar
    3+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jan 2022
    Location
    K'aresh is Midnight!
    Posts
    2,223
    We’ve got our expansion!

  11. #46891
    Quote Originally Posted by Moth Preacher View Post

    Background feels like it really isn't in-game warcraft tbh
    Yea its not ingame, the dwarf is clearly just photoshopped infront of it. Blizzard would never use that caption and its the 3rd different text color.

  12. #46892
    Quote Originally Posted by Catastrophy349 View Post
    We’ve got our expansion!
    The 4 screenshots, the 3 screenshots, or the binary?

  13. #46893
    I hate saying "AI" to everything because it isn't always AI, but it definitely looks like an outright flat piece of art behind him.

    Quote Originally Posted by Calfredd View Post
    The 4 screenshots, the 3 screenshots, or the binary?
    I mean this with zero shade, bullying, or insult - but I am 30% sure that Catastrophy is a chatbot designed to say exciting things at variable intervals.

    "We've got our expansion!" feels like a non-sequitur.

  14. #46894
    The Unstoppable Force Chickat's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Orgrimmar
    Posts
    20,829
    Quote Originally Posted by matijwow View Post
    One interesting thing to note is, at least in game, they had the Primal Incarnates follow the elemental traits from Chronicle 1.
    If we consider Vyranoth water, her indecisiveness could lead to her betraying us in the end.

  15. #46895
    "Oathbreaking" is the worst name so far.

  16. #46896
    Oathbreaker would be closer to a Blizzard expac name and even then I don't think they'd use that either.

  17. #46897
    Quote Originally Posted by matijwow View Post
    I was soooo close.
    i want corgeans NOW


    BRING BACK CORRUPTION GEAR
    BRING BACK TWILIGHT DEVESTATION

  18. #46898
    The Unstoppable Force Chickat's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Orgrimmar
    Posts
    20,829
    Quote Originally Posted by Woggmer View Post
    I've seen a lot of AI generated images and I can tell you, these aren't done with AI. An AI can make small mistakes like trees warping..

    To me, as of now, this is the most legitimate leak.
    Which one? the newest 3?

  19. #46899
    Quote Originally Posted by matijwow View Post
    I was soooo close.
    It's all downhill after this image. This is what peak wow looks like.

  20. #46900
    Quote Originally Posted by donjn View Post
    I've thought of this too. Avaloren is patch 10.3.
    A new expansion won't get announced. It will get announced sometime in the spring.

    Look:

    Legion release August 2016
    BFA announce November 2017
    GAP 15 months

    BFA Release August 2018
    Shadowlands announce November 2019
    GAP 15 months

    Shadowlands Release November 2020
    Dragonflight announced April 2022
    GAP 17 months

    Dragonflight release November 2022
    New Expansion announce November 2023
    GAP less than 12 months
    It doesn't seem that unlikely given DF had a much shorter announcement to release than usual.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •