1. #53461
    Quote Originally Posted by CrossNgen View Post
    The actual twist is that Azeroth isn't a Titan soul.

    The title is a red herring.
    My guess is that she started as a Titan, but she's been infused by all forces making her something new.

  2. #53462
    Quote Originally Posted by Well Done Steak View Post
    Eh, but isn't that what plain old hunter is?
    I don't have a good name for it, but I certainly doubt they go for 1 techno subclass and 2 edge-lord ones. I think dark ranger is a given, but two? I guess they could name it Rexxar-specialisation.
    You are welcome, Metzen. I hope you won't fuck up my underground expansion idea.

  3. #53463
    Quote Originally Posted by Vakir View Post
    Did they explain why Anduin and Thrall are seemingly confused by who is talking to them or the "SOMEONE" Sargeras was aiming at when we've known for a while now that Azeroth is a nascent Titan?

    (Silly quibble, it's also just a weird line considering that the sword didn't need to be aimed at "someone." Sargeras was going to try to destroy the planet with Gorribal and the only reason the sword didn't go far enough in was that he got shackled in just the right amount of time. Thrall, without the knowledge of Azeroth being a living entity, wouldn't have reason to think that. He'd just assume "oh, ok, guy who wanted universal omnicide was trying to destroy another planet.")

    Are we...are we just not gonna tell them? Did Magni say nothing to them? Is Magni going to continue to say nothing to them?

    It's not a mystery, guys. Azeroth is talking to you. We're doing the Hydaelen thing.



    They gotta justify a world-shattering level of overpowered heroes and many nations worth resources being away for some reason. Probably some kind of political upheaval.
    First of all, the sword isn't gorribal, that's not canon.

    Second of all, I think you are misinterpreting thrall. I felt the implication of the dialogue was sargeras was trying to kill something that was working to corrupt the world soul. Of course it could be me misinterpreting things. I'm fairly certain they aren't gonna pretend BFA heart of azeroth/world soul communion (even back during end of legion actually iirc) didn't happen. Given that ties directly into the sword in the first place...

  4. #53464
    Quote Originally Posted by Daniri View Post
    They mentioned Thrall is finding his new place in the Horde.
    Since when is he not.

  5. #53465
    Quote Originally Posted by Teriz View Post
    So you're sticking around despite 11.0 being an underground expansion?
    While im more excited for the Elf stuff in Midnight Dark Ranger is something I've wanted for a VERY long time and now all rep is account wide im so happy!

  6. #53466
    Titan Grimbold21's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Azores, Portugal
    Posts
    11,893
    Quote Originally Posted by Worldshaper View Post
    Hmm.

    One potential point of mild criticism I might have against Blizzard would be the choice of the Earthen as an Allied Race. They look cool and all, but they're really just earthy, crystallised dwarves.

    Don't dwarf players prefer proper dwarves?

    It's a bit like the Dracthyr situation. Did dragon players really want gecko lizards, or did they really want drakonids?
    Dwarves being the master race, you can never have too much of them

  7. #53467
    I don't mind if the expansions have full price if they have the same amount of launch content, regarding of speed they release and whether or not it has 2 major patches as the standard.
    I will not reply to posts that are non-constructive or contain flaming and/or trolling.

  8. #53468
    Quote Originally Posted by Worldshaper View Post
    Hmm.

    One potential point of mild criticism I might have against Blizzard would be the choice of the Earthen as an Allied Race. They look cool and all, but they're really just earthy, crystallised dwarves.

    Don't dwarf players prefer proper dwarves?

    It's a bit like the Dracthyr situation. Did dragon players really want gecko lizards, or did they really want drakonids?
    If Teriz is anything to go by then Dracthyr are fine for those players because they ARE DRAGONS.

  9. #53469
    Quote Originally Posted by Worldshaper View Post
    Hmm.

    One potential point of mild criticism I might have against Blizzard would be the choice of the Earthen as an Allied Race. They look cool and all, but they're really just earthy, crystallised dwarves.

    Don't dwarf players prefer proper dwarves?

    It's a bit like the Dracthyr situation. Did dragon players really want gecko lizards, or did they really want drakonids?
    The Earthen as an AR feels all around strange. Like they only added it because someone said the expansion needed one more small thing to show and the AR was the only idea they had.
    The world revamp dream will never die!

  10. #53470
    Legendary! Wangming's Avatar
    5+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    Not Azeroth
    Posts
    6,325
    Quote Originally Posted by Pinksocking View Post
    I'm honestly annoyed about this

    ITS THE THIRD DWARF BLIZZARD CMON
    To be fair we also have four humans (regular, fat, werewolf, dead)
    And four elves (night, nightborne, blood, void)
    So three dwarves isn't that much.
    Would I have been happier with Naga? Or the Tiger people? Or Jinyu?
    Most likely, yes. But I might still get some nice stuff with hero talents. I mean Dark Ranger is right there.

  11. #53471
    The Insane Nymrohd's Avatar
    3+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2022
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    16,466
    Let's see what changes they will make to Cata.

  12. #53472
    Legendary! Fahrad Wagner's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Ruins of Dalaran
    Posts
    6,985
    Quote Originally Posted by Myrrh View Post
    I'm still not seeing how time travel factors into this? 12.0 is void invasion centred around Quel'Thalas.
    Didn't they say in the presentation we'd be going to past Quel'Thalas? I may have misheard this, to be fair no time travel would make 100% more sense.

  13. #53473
    Quote Originally Posted by Cheezits View Post
    How did you find out?
    Hot mic I think. Crazy

  14. #53474
    Quote Originally Posted by blaatschaap View Post
    First of all, the sword isn't gorribal, that's not canon.

    Second of all, I think you are misinterpreting thrall. I felt the implication of the dialogue was sargeras was trying to kill something that was working to corrupt the world soul. Of course it could be me misinterpreting things. I'm fairly certain they aren't gonna pretend BFA heart of azeroth/world soul communion (even back during end of legion actually iirc) didn't happen. Given that ties directly into the sword in the first place...
    It's almost certainly called Gorribal. We already know that Aggramar had the weapon Taeschalach because it's a weapon we can get. And given it looks partially broken I think it's clear the developers intended the old lore with Gorschalach to be the case.
    The world revamp dream will never die!

  15. #53475
    Btw, I wonder if the idea of a balance between light and dark is now out of the window. So far it certainly seems like the next 2 expansions will be once again light good, dark ebil.
    You are welcome, Metzen. I hope you won't fuck up my underground expansion idea.

  16. #53476
    Quote Originally Posted by Syegfryed View Post
    every patch this dude is finding his new place in the horde
    Thrall is coping with the reality that he doesn't fit in with his race. He was raised by humans to act like a human, and then only began learning about Orcish culture second hand when he was in his late teens. Then he tried living his idealized version of Orcish culture, passed on to him by romantic stories from Grom and using human ideas of what civilization should look like. He modelled Orgrimmar after human cities and kingdoms when the Orcs had no cities or kingdoms on their homeworld. He became unpopular with the Orcs after Wrath and was pressured into selecting Garrosh as his successor as he was popular with the Orcs. Then Thrall stepped away and came back to find out that the Orcs had reverted back to the evil Orcish Horde. And then it happened again. Thrall has realized that the Orcs don't want to live in a civilized human-styled kingdom, nor live up to the idealized expectations of Grom. Thrall is ideologically closer to the humans, but they're not his people and trying to live among them would be awkward. Thrall is a knight without a kingdom worth serving. So he wanders.

  17. #53477
    Quote Originally Posted by Floot View Post
    The key art gives a strong impression that this is a group of grizzled adventures who step away from the Horde / Alliance faction boundaries.

    Thrall and Anduin appear more like lone / rogue adventurers than as representatives of the Alliance or Horde.
    For sure. I think one of my concerns/fears with how this new story structure is being laid out is that, at least for TWW, it seems like we're doing the 3rd expansion in a row of a completely neutral expedition to mysterious lands where we help a disconnected native group unique to each zone. I guess the Dragonscale Expedition is meant to be that link back, but they're so bland and inconsequential that it didn't work for me at all in DF.

    I'm still not sure what I think of this all, and I can't really sit on it since I have to go leave and watch the 3 and a half hour long Scorcese movie in a few minutes. It feels like this is all building up to the end of WoW, or at least what we've recognized as it, while I've been hoping for a revamp that focused on the individual races and advancing their stories more. Like, why were they even bringing Gilneas up if it seems like (right now) it's still not going to go anywhere? Maybe Midnight will be more in that vein. Just feeling overwhelmed at the moment.

  18. #53478
    Oh boy... I'm not sure how I feel about it...

    I have a feeling, that we have entered a very weird chapter of WoW, where instead of continous development, we get reiteration of the same pattern for at least the next 3 expansions.

    There's nothing groundbreaking in this. At first, saga sounded to me like "reimagining" the game from top to toe, but the more I think about it, I fear that doesn't bring that much to the table.

    Delves, yeah, that's new, and I hope it's cool, but didn't excite me too much sounds a bit like mainly a single player scenario that will get boring after a month or two.

    The reveal sounded more like "half-expansion" or a massive, massive patch, rather than a proper expansion. That wasn't too hypey to me.

    Storyline seems to be:
    1) we are dealing with Nerubians and Xal'atath and some other foes that come in probably 2 patches;
    2) we venture to revamped northren Eastern Kingdoms, which will become Quel'thalas and deal with Void and Sunwell stuff, where Alleria's story continues and she's the main protagonist there;
    3) we go to revamped Northrend and some cool stuff happen there with the titan's lore;

    Based on Ion said about revamping the world being done partially, it seems like a logical follow-up.


    On one side, the story flow smoothly, that's for sure, as that is basically the main idea behind it. On the other hand, it may feel dull and we'll be dragging the story from one place to another. At least, I hope it opens up a possibility for new heroes and foes to flourish naturally.

    The risk there is - if it comes out poorly, we are stuck with this pattern with quite some time. Hopefully it turns out to be refreshing.

  19. #53479
    Quote Originally Posted by blaatschaap View Post
    First of all, the sword isn't gorribal, that's not canon.

    Second of all, I think you are misinterpreting thrall. I felt the implication of the dialogue was sargeras was trying to kill something that was working to corrupt the world soul. Of course it could be me misinterpreting things. I'm fairly certain they aren't gonna pretend BFA heart of azeroth/world soul communion (even back during end of legion actually iirc) didn't happen. Given that ties directly into the sword in the first place...
    Maybe, but Taeschlach is canon, as is Gorschlach in the trinket name. Just making it simple here.

    Maybe? That's not a misinterpretation if it's speculation right now. Either way, Thrall would have no reason to overinterpret that unless this cinematic is in medias res further into the saga.

    Either way, they don't seem to really know that she's a Titan. I thought it was common knowledge at this point! Even Khadgar was told that.

  20. #53480
    Quote Originally Posted by Worldshaper View Post
    Hmm.

    One potential point of mild criticism I might have against Blizzard would be the choice of the Earthen as an Allied Race. They look cool and all, but they're really just earthy, crystallised dwarves.

    Don't dwarf players prefer proper dwarves?

    It's a bit like the Dracthyr situation. Did dragon players really want gecko lizards, or did they really want drakonids?
    To respond to this, I've been waiting for a 'Titanforged' race for a long time.

    True mechagnomes, vrykul, metal dwarves. etc
    Last edited by kavikor; 2023-11-03 at 11:55 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •