1. #60181
    Quote Originally Posted by Enrif View Post
    My newest theory about TWW and into Midnight:

    Alleria and Thrall were the bosses of the Visions of N'Zoth, Anduin was (request by blizzard to the Author of the book) in the post BfA book showing dark magic on his hands.

    All three of them are the faces of TWW? and the expansion after wards is full on void focus? No coincidence. All three of them might fall to the void and Xal'atath might win the war within these characters, even if we beat the bosses in the expansion.
    that would actually be great, but anduin already had his "dark" moment. next expansion is about finding himself again

  2. #60182
    Enough with the villain-batting of historic Alliance leaders.

    Archbishop Benedictus, Fandral Staghelm, and now this?

    Enough.

  3. #60183
    Quote Originally Posted by Varodoc View Post
    Enough with the villain-batting of historic Alliance leaders.

    Archbishop Benedictus, Fandral Staghelm, and now this?

    Enough.
    "Historic Alliance Leaders" is a funny way to say "random npcs." When Benedictus & Staghelm were introduced it seems like they were there solely to be future antagonists. Staghelm is overtly hostile to Tyrande in vanilla for no reason, and Benedictus is very generic but his name denotes his Wormtongue qualities... Benediction... or Benedict Arnold?

    If Alleria is simply supposed to be a new protagonist figure who just wants peace & gets over her orc racism, great. But that would paint a pretty clear difference in whoever is steering the story during legion & whoever is doing it now. Besides her and her husband choosing the symbolism of the Alliance over their homelands, Alleria wanting to claim the Sunwell even after she causes a giant void incursion is definitely "villain-baiting"

    If I was in charge of wow the expansion after the shadowlands would have been our characters returning to an Azeroth destroyed by nuclear war & then using time travel to undo it.
    Last edited by Ersula; 2024-03-02 at 02:24 PM.

  4. #60184
    Quote Originally Posted by Ersula View Post
    "Historic Alliance Leaders" is a funny way to say "random npcs." When Benedictus & Staghelm were introduced it seems like they were there solely to be future antagonists. Staghelm is overtly hostile to Tyrande in vanilla for no reason, and Benedictus is very generic but his name denotes his Wormtongue qualities... Benediction... or Benedict Arnold?

    If Alleria is simply supposed to be a new protagonist figure who just wants peace & gets over her orc racism, great. But that would paint a pretty clear difference in whoever is steering the story during legion & whoever is doing it now. Alleria wanting to claim the Sunwell even after she causes a giant void incursion is definitely "villain-baiting"
    We have already established that you are a Horde partisan who hates the Alliance to death, so I am not surprised that you know nothing about Staghelm and Benedictus.

  5. #60185
    The Undying Teriz's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Undermine
    Posts
    34,184
    Quote Originally Posted by Enrif View Post
    My newest theory about TWW and into Midnight:

    Alleria and Thrall were the bosses of the Visions of N'Zoth, Anduin was (request by blizzard to the Author of the book) in the post BfA book showing dark magic on his hands.

    All three of them are the faces of TWW? and the expansion after wards is full on void focus? No coincidence. All three of them might fall to the void and Xal'atath might win the war within these characters, even if we beat the bosses in the expansion.
    You're forgetting Gazlowe. If that short story is anything to go by, he's going to be a major character in TWW as well. It would fit too, since it would be two alliance and two horde characters. For whatever reason, Blizzard is hiding Gazlowe's new look.

  6. #60186
    I am Murloc! Usagi Senshi's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    The Rabbit Hole
    Posts
    5,449
    Quote Originally Posted by Makorus View Post
    FFXIV on consoles work because the pace of the game is sooooo much slower.
    Tera had better, faster, and no tab-targetting combat (compared to WoW and FFXIV, and don't even come at me stating otherwise, its fact plain and simple. I'll ignore you for being stupid) and worked more than fine on a gamepad and consoles.

    WoW is totally doable, just you guys seem to be hoping it never happens.

    Its very entertaining watching you lot go on with that train of thought, lol
    Last edited by Usagi Senshi; 2024-03-02 at 02:41 PM.
    Tikki tikki tembo, Usagi no Yojimbo, chari bari ruchi pip peri pembo!

  7. #60187
    Over 9000! Makabreska's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Streets Strange by Moonlight
    Posts
    9,483
    Quote Originally Posted by Usagi Senshi View Post
    Tera had better, faster, and no tab-targetting combat (compared to WoW and FFXIV, and don't even come at me stating otherwise, its fact plain and simple. I'll ignore you for being stupid) and worked more than fine on a gamepad and consoles.

    WoW is totally doable, just you guys seem to be hoping it never happens.

    Its very entertaining watching you lot go on with that train of thought, lol
    As entertaining as watching people thinking that console players will be able to handle split-second precise movement and targeting with gamepad we currently have in game.
    Last edited by Makabreska; 2024-03-02 at 05:51 PM.
    Sometimes, the light of the moon is a key to other spaces. I've found a place where, for a night or two, the streets curve in unfamiliar ways. If I walk here, I might find insight, or I might be touched by madness.

  8. #60188
    Quote Originally Posted by Usagi Senshi View Post
    Tera had better, faster, and no tab-targetting combat (compared to WoW and FFXIV, and don't even come at me stating otherwise, its fact plain and simple. I'll ignore you for being stupid) and worked more than fine on a gamepad and consoles.

    WoW is totally doable, just you guys seem to be hoping it never happens.

    Its very entertaining watching you lot go on with that train of thought, lol
    Tera, once again, was a way slower game than WoW, funnily enough. I am not talking about the combat system or whatever, that's completely irrelevant.

    Look at any dungeon or raid. The amount of split-second decisions you need to take would be near enough impossible with a control. Any content needs to be clearable using controller as well. The thought of doing a fight like Tindral or Smolderon using a controller is just laughable, same with any high level M+. WoW is just too fast-paced.

  9. #60189
    Quote Originally Posted by Teriz View Post
    You're forgetting Gazlowe. If that short story is anything to go by, he's going to be a major character in TWW as well. It would fit too, since it would be two alliance and two horde characters. For whatever reason, Blizzard is hiding Gazlowe's new look.
    Which would be true in a competent work of fiction, but in-game & in supplementary material, wow almost always throws their characters little bones in the form of vignettes that ultimately have nothing to do with the current or upcoming expansions. Based on that there's a higher chance the short story is indicative of nothing.

    It's actually infuriating, personally. I'd prefer if they simply focused on relevant characters in each expansion era instead of misleading the audience into thinking side characters are going to play a larger role later further into an expansion's plot. It's like watching a movie where they dedicate scenes to characters that instantly disappear for the rest of the duration.
    Quote Originally Posted by Varodoc View Post
    We have already established that you are a Horde partisan who hates the Alliance to death, so I am not surprised that you know nothing about Staghelm and Benedictus.
    I know you know enough about WoW to remember the allegedly deep & meaningful backstories Staghelm & Benedictus have were created long after vanilla wow, where their characterization is limited to "mincing". I suppose that means the opposite of "villain-baiting" is "retconning."
    Last edited by Ersula; 2024-03-02 at 04:10 PM.

  10. #60190
    Pandaren Monk Foreign Exchange Ztudent's Avatar
    3+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Sep 2021
    Location
    In Managed Decline
    Posts
    1,756
    Better vignettes happening than nothing at all. The books are the last competently done thing we have regarding characterization due to the crunch of the live product and lack of planning leading to consistent schism of character writing.
    I no longer reply to quotations beyond if you're asking a genuine question or have a non-confrontational stance.


  11. #60191
    Quote Originally Posted by Ersula View Post
    It's actually infuriating, personally."
    I know, right? It must be so infuriating that the Alliance still exists.

    I know you know enough about WoW to remember the allegedly deep & meaningful backstories Staghelm & Benedictus have were created long after vanilla wow, where their characterization is limited to "mincing". I suppose that means the opposite of "villain-baiting" is "retconning."
    Partisan stuff like this is precisely the reason why the Horde playerbase gets 0 sympathy from Me.

    I genuinely, from the bottom of My heart, hope that the Horde gets villain-batted for a Third time.

    If you are not able to understand the Alliance's loss in Staghelm and Benedictus, you don't deserve sympathy when your [ugly/crappy] capital gets raided and Warchief turned into loot pinata.

  12. #60192
    The Insane Nymrohd's Avatar
    3+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2022
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    16,474
    Honestly I felt that if any Alliance NPC was ever going to go dark (other than Alleria) it would be Genn or Moira. Moira absolutely gives me "end justifies the means" and Genn is the original Alliance asshole. But both seem neutered. Which is sad cause Moira could have been an amazing villain plus imo she controls the strongest part of the Alliance; the dwarves have only consolidated while Stormwind keeps getting hits.

    I guess Rogers as well but they never developed her enough and she ain't important enough.

  13. #60193
    Quote Originally Posted by Nymrohd View Post
    Honestly I felt that if any Alliance NPC was ever going to go dark (other than Alleria) it would be Genn or Moira. Moira absolutely gives me "end justifies the means" and Genn is the original Alliance asshole. But both seem neutered. Which is sad cause Moira could have been an amazing villain plus imo she controls the strongest part of the Alliance; the dwarves have only consolidated while Stormwind keeps getting hits.

    I guess Rogers as well but they never developed her enough and she ain't important enough.
    True Alliance Fans picked the Alliance to be the Heroic/Noble/Protagonist side.

    So why any Alliance hero should be villain-batted?

    That is not the fantasy Alliance fans chose when they picked the faction.

  14. #60194
    Quote Originally Posted by Nymrohd View Post
    Honestly I felt that if any Alliance NPC was ever going to go dark (other than Alleria) it would be Genn or Moira. Moira absolutely gives me "end justifies the means" and Genn is the original Alliance asshole. But both seem neutered. Which is sad cause Moira could have been an amazing villain plus imo she controls the strongest part of the Alliance; the dwarves have only consolidated while Stormwind keeps getting hits.

    I guess Rogers as well but they never developed her enough and she ain't important enough.
    genn retired in patch 10.2.5. he's looking for anduin now. only moira is left

  15. #60195
    Quote Originally Posted by Varodoc View Post
    There's a reason why that "B-but Camp Taurajo :'( " meme exists. The Horde playerbase literally does not want the Alliance to ever be aggressive or proactive.
    We could waste our time going over about how the "Horde should be a conquering army" fanbase, your Sylvanases and Garroshes and the "Horde should be victims who get to kick back", going on about Taurajos and Purges, etc. who agree about wanting an aggressive Alliance collectively (and likely individually) outnumber the Alliance fanbase who actually want to both be proactive in the faction war and actually be presented as less than purer than the driven snow, but you make the point yourself like two pages later, so we'd be wasting our time more than usual:

    Quote Originally Posted by Varodoc View Post
    True Alliance Fans picked the Alliance to be the Heroic/Noble/Protagonist side.

    So why any Alliance hero should be villain-batted?

    That is not the fantasy Alliance fans chose when they picked the faction.
    And in any case it doesn't matter, only the writers' perspective does and while we have had writers who've portrayed an aggressive Horde and occasionally ones who've portrayed a victim Horde, said writers have since Cataclysm and a one-off in Mists portrayed the Alliance as the protagonist faction populated exclusively by copy-pasted clones of the same lawful good human guy and girl and the Horde as their put-upon helpers, occasionally castrating themselves for the collective good.

    Instead of going on about this entirely zero-sum point, let's accept that within this paradigm, Turalyon can't be anything but a wet blanket who goes along with everything, much like the Alliance can't actually hold any beliefs that would lead to conflict. Hence both BFA, SL and the eventual neutral QT where all the assorted elves shake hands and hopefully take a brief hike right afterwards like their purple equivalent. For what it's worth, he'll be presented heroically in his capacity as a wet blanket, like the various Alexes, Tirions and Bolvars.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Ersula View Post
    I agree that this is what they should do but we're pretty far from that. When's the last time anything faction related was used to promote the game? So far the face of TWW is an orc & human hugging in front of a giant sword in the desert.

    Not to mention they've been bending over backwards to make the face of the Forsaken a generic white human woman.
    Yes, an orc and a human in the background of it. Thrall for the Horde, Anduin for the Alliance, obviously the story will center around Anduin and Alleria. When Thrall got to participate in a (equally wretched) story where he was the world protagonist there were riots on the streets ally-wise and ever since a neutral expansion has been code for an Alliance expansion. However, for marketing purposes, the two are still distinct, and red and blue are spread enough for merchandise that fully ditching them is unlikely to happen in the near future. Even in the very unlikely event we get Horde humans and Alliance orcs, there'll still be teases of the factions so as to be able to wring attention and cash out of the remains.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Cheezits View Post
    Actually, addressing this point: the twitterati is obsessed with certain Horde races actually punishing Alliance forces that were bad to them in the past, to an obnoxious degree, so no they would NOT be appeased by the Amani being chill with the Helves. They want reparations.
    This is true, but for now they'll eat a moderately fat one, in so far as the current crop of Blizzard writers are of the generation immediately prior to that standpoint and will instead write a story where reparations are provided but the races reconcile because they're only cosmetically different after all and are either a) sorry for what happened before or b) part of some big mix-up and didn't mean it. It'll take a couple years for fiction as racial revenge fantasy to hit this franchise. Sadly for the rest of us, said reconciliation and friendship angle is just as unfit for purpose.
    Last edited by Super Dickmann; 2024-03-02 at 08:16 PM.
    Dickmann's Law: As a discussion on the Lore forums becomes longer, the probability of the topic derailing to become about Sylvanas approaches 1.

    Tinkers will be the next Class confirmed.
    Quote Originally Posted by A Young Super Dickmann
    [9.2] won't be [DF's] last major patch, I have seen it... If it is I'll write pro-Calia fanfiction.

  16. #60196
    Quote Originally Posted by Varodoc View Post
    True Alliance Fans picked the Alliance to be the Heroic/Noble/Protagonist side.

    So why any Alliance hero should be villain-batted?

    That is not the fantasy Alliance fans chose when they picked the faction.
    In the most surface sense the World of Warcraft Alliance are designed to be heroes & the Horde are designed to be anti-heroes, but those are both kinds of protagonists. Most forms of genre fiction do storylines in which protagonists-aligned characters switch sides. Halo, Game of Thrones, Marvel & DC comics... it's very common. But if you're asking for one side of a war to always be morally upstanding, that's simply unrealistic. Even Galadriel committed the first kin-slaying by mistake.
    Quote Originally Posted by Super Dickmann View Post
    Yes, an orc and a human in the background of it. Thrall for the Horde, Anduin for the Alliance, obviously the story will center around Anduin and Alleria. When Thrall got to participate in a (equally wretched) story where he was the world protagonist there were riots on the streets ally-wise and ever since a neutral expansion has been code for an Alliance expansion. However, for marketing purposes, the two are still distinct, and red and blue are spread enough for merchandise that fully ditching them is unlikely to happen in the near future. Even in the very unlikely event we get Horde humans and Alliance orcs, there'll still be teases of the factions so as to be able to wring attention and cash out of the remains.
    This is true, but the statement "Humans would never be in the horde" but also "Forsaken don't count" is fraught. If the creators want to do something they're going to do it. Justification is only for the sake of the audience. With different circumstances it would have made as much sense for the Gilneans to join the Horde; Werewolves would have fit the Horde aesthetic of playing as traditional rpg monsters. The same goes for Dark Iron Dwarves. Like Drow/Nightborne, Duregar Dwarves are traditionally villainous & if they hadn't reached political recompense before BFA it would have made sense for them to join the Horde as well.
    Last edited by Ersula; 2024-03-02 at 08:28 PM.

  17. #60197
    don't worry, horde and ally are friends now, there are going to be no faction leader villains anymore

  18. #60198
    Quote Originally Posted by Makabreska View Post
    As entertaining as watching people thinking that console players will be able to handle split-second precise movement and targeting with gamepad we currently have in game.
    That is why we might get a separate WoW Retail version for both PC and console. It might be a version without addons and with an slightly different interface, and maybe with some changes in combat, although I do not know how much work that will entail.

    I also think that some of you do not realise how good playing in a controller feels and how easily many players do high content with a controller.

    WoW will most certainly come to Xbox first, and probably PS5 at some point. I think that TWW is definitively the right moment to do so and I honestly wiill be surprised if we do not see more information about this topic during 2024.
    Do not take life too seriously. You will never get out of it alive.


  19. #60199
    Quote Originally Posted by Ersula View Post
    This is true, but the statement "Humans would never be in the horde" but also "Forsaken don't count" is fraught. If the creators want to do something they're going to do it. Justification is only for the sake of the audience. With different circumstances it would have made as much sense for the Gilneans to join the Horde.
    No, it's pretty obvious why a race of zombies, serving as the analogue of the WC3 undead, being added to the orcs is different from the titular Humans of a franchise that began with a game literally called "Orcs and Humans" being added to the same. In so far as the worgen, e.g. a werewolf analogue were possible to add to the Horde, it's a pointless hypothetical. The entire worgen lore as presented exists in order to lead into their conflict with the Forsaken and make them distinct from reggo humans. Their entire lore prior puts Gilneas as among the kingdoms least likely to join the Horde given that Genn was vouching to have every orc killed and quit the Alliance over this not happening and the worgen as a side-race that are 100% hostile to the only playable race nearby in the Forsaken. In so far as any gyrations were possible to put them Horde-side, they didn't happen and have zero info in the text and thus don't have anything to discuss.
    Dickmann's Law: As a discussion on the Lore forums becomes longer, the probability of the topic derailing to become about Sylvanas approaches 1.

    Tinkers will be the next Class confirmed.
    Quote Originally Posted by A Young Super Dickmann
    [9.2] won't be [DF's] last major patch, I have seen it... If it is I'll write pro-Calia fanfiction.

  20. #60200
    Quote Originally Posted by Darkarath View Post
    That is why we might get a separate WoW Retail version for both PC and console. It might be a version without addons and with an slightly different interface, and maybe with some changes in combat, although I do not know how much work that will entail.
    there are already too many versions of wow lol. the game doesn't have 12m subs anymore

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •