1. #72521
    Quote Originally Posted by huth View Post
    If you haven't noticed yet that Iridikron doesn't give a shit about anybody but himself, i'm not sure how to help you.

    Wrathion acted specificially to protect the world, even if his plan was stupid. Iridikron acts purely out of selfish desires.

    - - - Updated - - -



    Yes he did. And he didn't care because he doesn't give a shit about Azeroth. If you haven't noticed, the primalists are deluded fools who just think they're helping while actively making things worse, too.

    Iridikron's goal is not noble and it isn't what you think.

    We can talk in like 5 years when we will be allied with Iridikron

  2. #72522
    Quote Originally Posted by Makorus View Post
    We can talk in like 5 years when we will be allied with Iridikron
    Even if everything the Titans might be guilty of turns out to be true, it would still make more sense to ally with the Titans against Iridikon.

  3. #72523
    Merely a Setback Lorgar Aurelian's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Land of moose and goose.
    Posts
    26,355
    Quote Originally Posted by Ersula View Post
    I said Forsaken. Because if she was going to the maw for what she did as their faction leader, they would also be going there. Actions Sylvanas would definitely feel are defensible.

    Placing Frostmorne on Azeroth & killing Argus were not done by Zovaal & nobody knew of the extent he was manipulating Sargeras so she would not have been able to see past his deception.
    That would be an even easier lie to see through and be at odd with the other things he was trying to convince her of as there were always forsaken that didn’t see eye to eye or go along with her and if your whole faction could get sent to the afterlife due to agreeing with the actions of your leader tons of family’s would togather and there would be no problem with how the arbiter was doing things.

    All of the forsaken going to the maw just isn’t a thing for why she joined the jailer.
    Last edited by Lorgar Aurelian; 2024-06-03 at 04:43 PM.
    All I ever wanted was the truth. Remember those words as you read the ones that follow. I never set out to topple my father's kingdom of lies from a sense of misplaced pride. I never wanted to bleed the species to its marrow, reaving half the galaxy clean of human life in this bitter crusade. I never desired any of this, though I know the reasons for which it must be done. But all I ever wanted was the truth.

  4. #72524
    Quote Originally Posted by Khaza-R View Post
    I never said it was?



    Not denying that at all. They've always been portrayed as sort of impersonal creators who only really care about Azeroth for their own means. That also doesn't mean they will straight up end up being raid bosses.
    Yes you did.

    To quote: "Always difficult to say how much of TWW was even actualized when DF itself was still in its concept stage. Personally I think any sort of subversive "Titans are evil" or "the Light is evil" is swiftly dropped and will never been seen again with the changing of the guard."

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Ersula View Post
    I said it first. And you missed it completely.Yes, but Illidan operated under the same mentality & the narrative frames him as good. Illidan, Sylvanas, Zovaal & Wrathion all had this rationality, while Iridikron just wants vengeance.

    If "malice" is the only defining factor, why are Sylvanas & Zovaal framed negatively while Wrathion & Illidan are not? Is it because they succeeded in what they were trying to do? Is Wrathion off the hook because it was an accident or because the people of azeroth ultimately succeeded at a goal he really didn't help with at all?
    No. We said the exact same thing. I said the Jailer didn't want to tell Sylvanas these things cause he wanted to bring her to his side. You made the same point but elaborated on it further. No idea what you're tryna debate here.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Also, Wrathion and Illidan do their things based off their moral compass. Sylvanas does the exact same thing. We just happen to see Wrathion and Illidans views as beneficial to us and Azeroth, while with Sylvanas...well...not so much.

    These guys see good and evil and for some of them, we see their views as just, while.for others we tend to disagree.

    Zovaal doesn't see good and evil. He wishes to spread his influence on the cosmology in his own way, and if he has to break the rules of the Cosmos in order for the Cosmic Pattern to endure, then he'll see it through. Doesn't matter if he lies or not cause he doesn't see it as evil or good.

  5. #72525
    Quote Originally Posted by Joshuaj View Post
    Zovaal doesn't see good and evil. He wishes to spread his influence on the cosmology in his own way, and if he has to break the rules of the Cosmos in order for the Cosmic Pattern to endure, then he'll see it through. Doesn't matter if he lies or not cause he doesn't see it as evil or good.
    So if his thesis was correct & that something else is going to come along & destroy the entire universe, would that make him good or evil? Does that imply evil survives while good is doomed to utter annihilation? If he sincerely believes that was the only way to save the universe, how can that be evil?
    Quote Originally Posted by Lorgar Aurelian View Post
    That would be an even easier lie to see through and be at odd with the other things he was trying to convince her of as there were always forsaken that didn’t see eye to eye or go along with her and if your whole faction could get sent to the afterlife due to the actions of your leader tons of family’s would togather and there would be no problem with how the arbiter was doing things.

    All of the forsaken going to the maw just isn’t a thing for why she joined the jailer.
    I think you're focusing on semantics of something that wasn't even the point of the original comment. Sylvanas finding one forsaken that didn't end up in the maw would not falsify anything the Jailer originally presented. "This one singular person was sent to the appropriate afterlife so I guess nothing needs fixing" is not a thought that would go thru Sylvanas' brain.

  6. #72526
    Quote Originally Posted by Ersula View Post
    So if his thesis was correct & that something else is going to come along & destroy the entire universe, would that make him good or evil? Does that imply evil survives while good is doomed to utter annihilation? If he sincerely believes that was the only way to save the universe, how can that be evil?
    I think you're focusing on semantics of something that wasn't even the point of the original comment. Sylvanas finding one forsaken that didn't end up in the maw would not falsify anything the Jailer originally presented. "This one singular person was sent to the appropriate afterlife so I guess nothing needs fixing" is not a thought that would go thru Sylvanas' brain.
    The bigger issue is more or less that evil in fiction and evil in the real world have different definitions. For example, Sauron wanted to Order all of Middle Earth. He wanted perfect order, no chaos, but according to the author, he is definitively evil. In Tolkien's world, evil is defined by a lack of admittedly very human morals, an unwillingness to see beauty, and an arrogance to decide others fates.

    But by real world standards all of those things could be debated. So instead of trying to insist on whether or not a character is evil, maybe antagonist or villain is a better phrasing.

  7. #72527
    Merely a Setback Lorgar Aurelian's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Land of moose and goose.
    Posts
    26,355
    Quote Originally Posted by Ersula View Post
    l
    I think you're focusing on semantics of something that wasn't even the point of the original comment. Sylvanas finding one forsaken that didn't end up in the maw would not falsify anything the Jailer originally presented. "This one singular person was sent to the appropriate afterlife so I guess nothing needs fixing" is not a thought that would go thru Sylvanas' brain.
    It wouldn’t be a singular forsaken it would be all of them. Hundreds would have died aligning completely with her but aren’t in the maw and it would make no sense for one’s that didn’t agree with her would go there any way. And again this whole notion undermines what the jailer actually got her to join with which was that family’s didn’t get to be together.

    If you just ended up in the same place as your faction leader more family’s then not would he togather.
    All I ever wanted was the truth. Remember those words as you read the ones that follow. I never set out to topple my father's kingdom of lies from a sense of misplaced pride. I never wanted to bleed the species to its marrow, reaving half the galaxy clean of human life in this bitter crusade. I never desired any of this, though I know the reasons for which it must be done. But all I ever wanted was the truth.

  8. #72528
    Over 9000! Makabreska's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Streets Strange by Moonlight
    Posts
    9,280
    Sometimes, the light of the moon is a key to other spaces. I've found a place where, for a night or two, the streets curve in unfamiliar ways. If I walk here, I might find insight, or I might be touched by madness.

  9. #72529
    Quote Originally Posted by Joshuaj View Post
    Zovaal doesn't see good and evil. He wishes to spread his influence on the cosmology in his own way, and if he has to break the rules of the Cosmos in order for the Cosmic Pattern to endure, then he'll see it through. Doesn't matter if he lies or not cause he doesn't see it as evil or good.
    What about unbiased main materials calling him an ancient evil?

    What about his malicious and aggressive smirking in the 2nd CGI trailer?

    What about the dozens of times he says various threatening gestures with an outward hostile tone like "YOUR SOUL SHALL SUFFER FOR ETERNITY" or the like?

    What about the constant psychological and physical torture that literally does nothing of value to subjects who have literally no other purpose left?

    He literally gave Sylvanas her soul back to overwhelm her with guilt for no reason other than as a "fuck you." Nothing about that decision made any sense outside of spite.

    If the distant and almost cosmic horror like indifference was the intended vibe, that would almost be an interesting direction for the villain, but it's not how he's presented at all. He's the standard growly bad guy with at least some proneness to sadism.
    Last edited by Vakir; 2024-06-03 at 05:14 PM.

  10. #72530
    Quote Originally Posted by Lorgar Aurelian View Post
    It wouldn’t be a singular forsaken it would be all of them. Hundreds would have died aligning completely with her but aren’t in the maw and it would make no sense for one’s that didn’t agree with her would go there any way. And again this whole notion undermines what the jailer actually got her to join with which was that family’s didn’t get to be together.
    ...which wouldn't matter to the plan because anyone killed would eventually be reborn into new, better lives once the universe gets re-created, or so she is led to believe.
    Quote Originally Posted by Vakir View Post
    What about unbiased main materials calling him an ancient evil?
    No such thing as an unbiased perspective in this setting. Promotional materials have also described Illidan the same way. Yeah, Zovaal is evil but if as the writer you can't consistently explain why, something's wrong.
    Last edited by Ersula; 2024-06-03 at 05:17 PM.

  11. #72531
    Quote Originally Posted by Ersula View Post
    So if his thesis was correct & that something else is going to come along & destroy the entire universe, would that make him good or evil? Does that imply evil survives while good is doomed to utter annihilation? If he sincerely believes that was the only way to save the universe, how can that be evil?
    I think you're focusing on semantics of something that wasn't even the point of the original comment. Sylvanas finding one forsaken that didn't end up in the maw would not falsify anything the Jailer originally presented. "This one singular person was sent to the appropriate afterlife so I guess nothing needs fixing" is not a thought that would go thru Sylvanas' brain.
    It's not evil. That's my whole.point. He simply seeks to benefit the universe in his own way. The other Eternal Ones may call him malevolent (which could be deemed as evil, but idk if the Eternal Ones see that as "evil" and more so just fucked up) due to him going against the Cosmic Pattern and it's laws, and us mortals may put a sense of morality on his plans. But the Jailer doesn't see it that way. He, as a Cosmic being, would fundamentally not put things to good and evil. Even Denathrius, who is a full on supporter of Zovaals plans, does not see Good and Evil. He simply wants Death to be the dominant power in the Cosmology, which is kinda the status quo for a lot of these forces.

  12. #72532
    Merely a Setback Lorgar Aurelian's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Land of moose and goose.
    Posts
    26,355
    Quote Originally Posted by Ersula View Post
    ...which wouldn't matter to the plan because anyone killed would eventually be reborn into new, better lives once the universe gets re-created, or so she is led to believe.
    It wouldn’t matter to the plan, but she also wouldn’t believe in said plan if every thing the jailer told her was an obvious lie.

    She was already sceptical when he made his pitch if it was obvious he was bullshitting her she never would have joined.
    All I ever wanted was the truth. Remember those words as you read the ones that follow. I never set out to topple my father's kingdom of lies from a sense of misplaced pride. I never wanted to bleed the species to its marrow, reaving half the galaxy clean of human life in this bitter crusade. I never desired any of this, though I know the reasons for which it must be done. But all I ever wanted was the truth.

  13. #72533
    Quote Originally Posted by Vakir View Post
    What about unbiased main materials calling him an ancient evil?

    What about his malicious and aggressive smirking in the 2nd CGI trailer?

    What about the dozens of times he says various threatening gestures with an outward hostile tone like "YOUR SOUL SHALL SUFFER FOR ETERNITY" or the like?

    What about the constant psychological and physical torture that literally does nothing of value to subjects who have literally no other purpose left?

    He literally gave Sylvanas her soul back to overwhelm her with guilt for no reason other than as a "fuck you." Nothing about that decision made any sense outside of spite.

    If the distant and almost cosmic horror like indifference was the intended vibe, that would almost be an interesting direction for the villain, but it's not how he's presented at all. He's the standard growly bad guy with at least some proneness to sadism.
    He wasn't smirking in the second CGI trailer. He's growling. He's pissed.

    Also, the things calling him an "ancient evil" simply refer to the fact that he is the antagonist and that us mortals on Azeroth would consider him as such due to what he wants for Azeroth and the cosmology as a whole.

    And I explained that Zovaal sees the suffering of mortals as a means to an end. To him, mortals are simply anima suppliers, and tormenting them brings out more anima for his twisted machines and whatnot.

    - - - Updated - - -

    I feel kinda dirty trying to explain the Jailer in any way...

  14. #72534
    Quote Originally Posted by Ersula View Post
    No such thing as an unbiased perspective in this setting. Promotional materials have also described Illidan the same way. Yeah, Zovaal is evil but if as the writer you can't consistently explain why, something's wrong.
    Something being wrong with SL's writing? Say it isn't so.

    Find me a third person omniscient account calling Illidan an ancient evil that isn't the discredited RPG alignments that predate anything. You could make an argument that he is that in TBC, but it's pretty universally agreed that the characterization of the Illidari trio was dogshit in that hence the walk back. But nothing independent.

    He's introduced that way from the outside perspective of the Wardens and the like, but it's absolutely valid for them to feel that way.

    You also conveniently ignored everything else. Preds isn't actually making a valid argument and you know that - he's trying to invoke more nuance than there actually is because he thinks the Jailer is cool.

  15. #72535
    Quote Originally Posted by Makabreska View Post
    Is that an official confirmation for undermine/goblin patch content? I would say so.

  16. #72536
    Seems like all the short stories from that book are gonna be free after all.

  17. #72537
    Quote Originally Posted by Xilurm View Post
    Seems like all the short stories from that book are gonna be free after all.
    They confirmed that most of them would be free. Only 1 story is book-specific...which imo is stupid.

  18. #72538
    Quote Originally Posted by Joshuaj View Post
    He wasn't smirking in the second CGI trailer. He's growling. He's pissed.
    He absolutely is. There's obviously anger in the expression based on his imprisonment but we already knew that.

    Also, the things calling him an "ancient evil" simply refer to the fact that he is the antagonist and that us mortals on Azeroth would consider him as such due to what he wants for Azeroth and the cosmology as a whole.
    If you can give me an example of a totally third person depiction that does the same that's consistent with prior characterization, do so. Otherwise you're just burying your head.

    And I explained that Zovaal sees the suffering of mortals as a means to an end. To him, mortals are simply anima suppliers, and tormenting them brings out more anima for his twisted machines and whatnot.
    The industrial scale of it goes beyond what's efficient considering about half the souls we're trying to save in Torghast almost immediately dissolve. This isn't some highly calculated set of decisions, and non-dominated characters that aren't depersonalized to the point of being automatons means that there's a method of doing all of this that doesn't involve it.

    That means it has less to do with him finding the shortest line to the goal and more to do with, at best, personal convenience.

    Also, explain Sylvanas (besides it being a contrivance to keep her in the story). That was a spiteful gesture. It didn't further his goals and, in fact, was directly involved in his downfall.

    He's either sadistic or stupid. Pick one.

    Even anger, justified or not, means a deliberate sense of spite that extends outside of a cosmological goal beyond good or evil because it implies some element of malicious intent, even if it's reactive.

    I feel kinda dirty trying to explain the Jailer in any way...
    I know you mean it in a "he's such a terrifying and cool character and that's why empathizing is hard!" way, but I think the feeling you're otherwise experiencing here is shame and it is appropriate.
    Last edited by Vakir; 2024-06-03 at 05:36 PM.

  19. #72539
    Quote Originally Posted by Vakir View Post
    What about unbiased main materials
    Like who, or what ?
    MMO Champs :

  20. #72540
    Quote Originally Posted by Makabreska View Post
    Christ, this is wretched.
    Dickmann's Law: As a discussion on the Lore forums becomes longer, the probability of the topic derailing to become about Sylvanas approaches 1.

    Tinkers will be the next Class confirmed.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •