1. #11381
    Quote Originally Posted by Worldshaper View Post
    I mean, I asked the mods to delete it because I wanted to stop using MMO-Champion. Speculating about this stuff can become quite addictive. But I've allowed myself to take part in this "season" because how super interesting everything is right now. It's like we're reaching a culmination of 30 years of lore next year. Plus Metzen's back, so I feel a little less detatched from the company I grew up with now.

    The old account was called MojoRisin or something like that, it's been a while.
    i mean you gotta admit "i was totaly right! on this other account that i no longer have..." sounds like a lie, and poor at that
    maybe you were maybe you werent, cant prove it so just dont be smug about something you said accidentaly being right when you cant even prove you said it
    Last edited by Lolites; 2023-08-11 at 06:49 AM.

  2. #11382
    You can easily make ED expansion with varied zones. Just like they turned Northrend into 10 something zones which was supposedly just a frozen waste land. There are 4-5 zones with mostly snow in there. Hell, one of the zones was a complete polar opposite of what you'd expect to find in a frozen wasteland (Sholazar)
    Or how argus is just "fel green shit" and then they made one of the zones yellow+purple.

    While I do think it's better suited as a patch (bevause an entire expac in a cosmic realm sucks (SL)), there's plenty of varied stuff you can do even when the description is lush, forests, pre azeroth, etc. Denying that just shows a lack of creativity and imagination.
    I will not reply to posts that are non-constructive or contain flaming and/or trolling.

  3. #11383
    Pandaren Monk Skildar's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    France
    Posts
    1,815
    people are angry at blizzard for going for cosmic themes and doing a shadowlands expansion and now I see people asking for an Emerald Dream expansion, I don't get it.

    Funny enough I enjoyed Shadowlands (except for its pacing), I'm not so sure I would enjoy an Emerald dream expansion. But for what it's worth, visually I'm betting it would be far more enjoyable than what we got in dragonflight

  4. #11384
    Quote Originally Posted by Skildar View Post
    people are angry at blizzard for going for cosmic themes and doing a shadowlands expansion and now I see people asking for an Emerald Dream expansion, I don't get it.

    Funny enough I enjoyed Shadowlands (except for its pacing), I'm not so sure I would enjoy an Emerald dream expansion. But for what it's worth, visually I'm betting it would be far more enjoyable than what we got in dragonflight
    Only reason Im not enjoying DF visually as much is because frankly, there isn't much to see when you zoom over everything at 1000% speed. I like dragonflying, but its just the same can of worms (but bigger) that they opened in TBC with flying.
    I will not reply to posts that are non-constructive or contain flaming and/or trolling.

  5. #11385
    Pandaren Monk Skildar's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    France
    Posts
    1,815
    Quote Originally Posted by micwini View Post
    Only reason Im not enjoying DF visually as much is because frankly, there isn't much to see when you zoom over everything at 1000% speed. I like dragonflying, but its just the same can of worms (but bigger) that they opened in TBC with flying.
    I don't know about this, the land feels as big as Northrend does but most its themes are poorly explored. The land just doesn't feel like the home of the dragonflights or even catered by dragonkins for millennia. The icy part have nothing interesting compared to frostfire ridge for instance, the decay part is just a zone filled with rotting trash, nothing imaginative. I hope next expansions will do better, because the art team dropped the ball with dragonflight

  6. #11386
    Quote Originally Posted by Skildar View Post
    I don't know about this, the land feels as big as Northrend does but most its themes are poorly explored. The land just doesn't feel like the home of the dragonflights or even catered by dragonkins for millennia. The icy part have nothing interesting compared to frostfire ridge for instance, the decay part is just a zone filled with rotting trash, nothing imaginative. I hope next expansions will do better, because the art team dropped the ball with dragonflight
    The size of the Dragon Isles are impressive, and they are objectively beautiful but they lack so much character and charm.

    They might even be the worst added landmass in an expansion for me.

  7. #11387
    Pandaren Monk Skildar's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    France
    Posts
    1,815
    Quote Originally Posted by Santandame View Post
    The size of the Dragon Isles are impressive, and they are objectively beautiful but they lack so much character and charm.
    I don't find them to be beautiful so no this is not objective

  8. #11388
    Quote Originally Posted by Skildar View Post
    I don't know about this, the land feels as big as Northrend does but most its themes are poorly explored. The land just doesn't feel like the home of the dragonflights or even catered by dragonkins for millennia. The icy part have nothing interesting compared to frostfire ridge for instance, the decay part is just a zone filled with rotting trash, nothing imaginative. I hope next expansions will do better, because the art team dropped the ball with dragonflight
    True. It feels like the continent was not made with dragonflying in mind. You can navigate it just as fine mostly on ground mount and/or regular flying mount.

    Quote Originally Posted by Santandame View Post
    The size of the Dragon Isles are impressive, and they are objectively beautiful but they lack so much character and charm.

    They might even be the worst added landmass in an expansion for me.
    I always cringe very hard when I see the word 'Objective' used followed by a subjective term. Beauty is not based on facts, but opinion. Proof is in the next post after:
    Quote Originally Posted by Skildar View Post
    I don't find them to be beautiful so no this is not objective
    I will not reply to posts that are non-constructive or contain flaming and/or trolling.

  9. #11389
    Didn’t know that comment would get people so riled up, Christ.
    @Skildar what kind of zones are to your liking?

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by micwini View Post
    True. It feels like the continent was not made with dragonflying in mind. You can navigate it just as fine mostly on ground mount and/or regular flying mount.



    I always cringe very hard when I see the word 'Objective' used followed by a subjective term. Beauty is not based on facts, but opinion. Proof is in the next post after:
    Individually and culturally, yes. But nature and phenomena, such as lakes, rivers, sweeping valleys, vistas, mountains, flowers, standard greenery - things that appeal universally to people and have done for thousands of years; not so much. I’m not sure why, in that context, it would make you cringe very hard.

  10. #11390
    Quote Originally Posted by Santandame View Post
    Didn’t know that comment would get people so riled up, Christ.
    @Skildar what kind of zones are to your liking?

    - - - Updated - - -



    Individually and culturally, yes. But nature and phenomena, such as lakes, rivers, sweeping valleys, vistas, mountains, flowers, standard greenery - things that appeal universally to people and have done for thousands of years; not so much. I’m not sure why, in that context, it would make you cringe very hard.
    https://www.dictionary.com/e/subjective-vs-objective/
    I will not reply to posts that are non-constructive or contain flaming and/or trolling.

  11. #11391
    Quote Originally Posted by Worldshaper View Post
    I think the zones are waaay too busy. Too many nooks and crannies, rocks, dwellings, hills, doodads, etc.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Man, I just read about a 200+ year old Koi fish.

    It just got me thinking how cool it would be to really delve deep into an oceanic expansion where we meet these ancient mermaids, jinyu, ankoan or whatever.

    Wise sages who have kept track of the "currents" of history for thousands of years. Willing to lens us their wisdom and offer sanctuary below the waves, while we work to reclaim the surface from Azshara.
    They just lack charm and character for me. I can’t deny the natural beauty and aesthetic of the zones. But they just feel vapid and devoid of any charm, for me.

    Valdrakken doesn’t feel like a draconic city at all. Azure Span while stunning to look at lacks the character of Grizzly Hills and Howling Fjord which it is seemingly trying to emulate. The Waking Shores have a nice prehistoric feel, but that’s as far as it goes for me. Thaldraszus is just there.

    Ohnara Plains are the best of the bunch with the main settlement feeling more like a living breathing place, but outside of that one area it runs into the same issues as the other zones.

    - - - Updated - - -

    You can be pedantic and send me a dictionary link all you want mate. It doesn’t discount what I said about nature universally appealing to humans, and doing so for thousands of years. Arguing otherwise just makes you seem contrarian. That’s the only thing to cringe very hard over here.

    - - - Updated - - -

    You can be pedantic and send me a dictionary link all you want mate. It doesn’t discount what I said about nature universally appealing to humans, and doing so for thousands of years. Arguing otherwise just makes you seem contrarian. That’s the only thing to cringe very hard over here.

  12. #11392
    Quote Originally Posted by Worldshaper View Post
    World of Warcraft coming to Xbox in 2024. Boom. Mic drop moment. The internet stops for a minute.
    Would that really be big news to anybody who isn't already a Warcraft fan? The appeal seems pretty limited, and I'm not sure if we're going to see any really groundbreaking Warcraft-related news in the near future. It might get some limited traction, but I don't think it'd do anything "internet-stopping" given that it's been somewhere in the ballpark of thirteen or fourteen years since WoW was last exceptionally big.

  13. #11393
    I wonder how the remaining 5 Zereths will be done.

  14. #11394
    Void Lord Aeluron Lightsong's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    In some Sanctuaryesque place or a Haven
    Posts
    44,683
    I prefer less mountains but I get why they did it for Dragon Isles.
    #TeamLegion #UnderEarthofAzerothexpansion plz #Arathor4Alliance #TeamNoBlueHorde

    Warrior-Magi

  15. #11395
    Quote Originally Posted by Well Done Steak View Post
    I wonder how the remaining 5 Zereths will be done.
    Hopefully they won’t. They should all look the same anyway, right?

  16. #11396
    I see plenty of comments about a potential Emerald Dream expansion, and fearing that it would be very boring to have a fully green forest-type continent. But isn't the emerald dream supposed to be what Azeroth would have been without "intelligent beings" ? If so, why would it be just forest ? Why no desert, icy peaks, swamps and all of that stuff ? None of these are the consequences of intelligent beings, right ? Sure we've only seen the green part, but it doesn't mean that it's everything there is.

    The real struggle I see with an emerald dream expansion is, on the opposite, the fact that there would be no intelligent beings, so no buildings, no civilisations, etc.
    MMO Champs :

  17. #11397
    Quote Originally Posted by Santandame View Post
    You can be pedantic and send me a dictionary link all you want mate. It doesn’t discount what I said about nature universally appealing to humans, and doing so for thousands of years. Arguing otherwise just makes you seem contrarian. That’s the only thing to cringe very hard over here.
    And you could stop being an ignoramus and actually read up on the matter instead of completely missing the point. Beauty is a subjective matter and any evaluation of it is inherently subjective. Something appealing to a large group of people has no bearing on that. Beauty cannot be measured objectively.

  18. #11398
    Pandaren Monk Skildar's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    France
    Posts
    1,815
    Quote Originally Posted by Santandame View Post
    Didn’t know that comment would get people so riled up, Christ.
    @Skildar what kind of zones are to your liking?
    I'm not sure you've gotten anyone riled up, you just can't use objectively and beautiful in the same sentence, it doesn't work.
    In WoW I've liked most of Pandaria and WoD zones I've also liked some zones here and there like Voldun, Sylvarden, Revendreth, Bastion, Howling Fjords, Zul drak, Stranglethorn Valley. You sometimes need some less appealing aesthetics but most of the times I enjoy sceneries and aesthetics that are full of wonders and visually new and smart. I think that's what a lot of people enjoyed about Nagrand and a few days ago I've found something quite similar in a video presentation for the new zones in Genshin Impact.





    I've felt no wonder on the dragon isles, I didn't feel one bit that these lands are the home of the dragons except for a few statues, it's more than disappointing. When you walk across Draenor you feel the orc and draenei heritage everywhere, the living land and the beautiful sceneries encourages you to take a break here and there and appreciate it, I didn't feel this in Dragonflight, the only thing I felt is that it is vast.

  19. #11399
    The Dragon Isles are incredible, by far my favorite continent ever created, in every way.

  20. #11400
    Quote Originally Posted by Skildar View Post
    I've felt no wonder on the dragon isles, I didn't feel one bit that these lands are the home of the dragons except for a few statues, it's more than disappointing. When you walk across Draenor you feel the orc and draenei heritage everywhere, the living land and the beautiful sceneries encourages you to take a break here and there and appreciate it, I didn't feel this in Dragonflight, the only thing I felt is that it is vast.
    God I couldn't agree more, finally someone gets it! I've been talking about this feeling the whole time and no one seemed to get it. DF's "aesthetics" are very basic as opposed to past efforts of the teams, think about Nazjatar, you never felt for a moment like it's not some underwater Naga stuff, the whole design and aesthetics scream hey I'm an underwater Naga city, and no zone gives me such unique vibes this expansion. (I've been farming old content for months now because I'm that uninterested in DF.)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •