Considering how many people took the Arthas bait with SL, I think saying to air the Uther cinematic at Gamescom being "cringey" is hilarious.
I am 50/50 on Gamescom at this point. But, I am really doubting it at this point.
Considering how many people took the Arthas bait with SL, I think saying to air the Uther cinematic at Gamescom being "cringey" is hilarious.
I am 50/50 on Gamescom at this point. But, I am really doubting it at this point.
I no longer reply to quotations beyond if you're asking a genuine question or have a non-confrontational stance.
Well partially because of the Uther animation. But partially because Sylvanas was a big deal.
The Uther animation practically screamed at you that Uther would have to atone by bringing Arthas back for proper judgment, and the logical endpoint for a storyline where Sylvanas was not satan by the end would have to touch on Arthas being equally manipulated by the Jailer, and probably to an even greater extent.
If anything Arthas just being relegated to a disenchanted wisp in the final raid was a massive letdown compared to the absolute tons of foreshadowing for Arthas being important.
The world revamp dream will never die!

FWIW 10.1 cinematic was shown 2 weeks prior the patch release and same with 10.0.7 so I wouldn't expect one. That being said, it could be different because of Gamescom and if they are indeed presenting something there.
I can't help but find it really weird to have a CM and Ybarra teasing something at Gamescom for it to be only Classic related. Hopefully there must be more.

IIRC speculation about Arthas appearing again in some capacity started back up with 8.0 when he had a new cinematic model in one of the cutscenes in Jaina's story. Then for SL, even before the Bluether animation released there were all the mentions of discovering who made Frostmourne and the Helm of Domination, callbacks to the design of ICC and Scourge architecture, etc. I definitely remember some pre-emptive groaning over some sort of possible Arthas redemption or otherwise dragging his character down, though who really knows what all was planned with how many times BfA and SL alike were rewritten or otherwise went awry.

She is yes, but I explained to hitei, we had one situation were she used her magic, very much a illusion against Farondis. If she is magically able to change her form to be used in certain conversions I mean thats kinda cool I guess, but I would still consider that an Illusion. Like others have said, she is a capeable spellcaster for stuff like that and you would expect such actions from her imo. She is smart.
I wonder how she will repressent herself in future content.
The quest was optional yes, you had to pick up the quest from the dagger on zanda, but I dont remember exactly how the quest became available. I had a priest who done all legion shit, so maybe it was available because I had the dagger.
Last edited by Alanar; 2023-08-21 at 07:26 PM.
Yeah... i very much doubt Azshara considers her naga self as anything but hideous.
Last edited by Raetary; 2023-08-21 at 07:43 PM.
Sometimes, the light of the moon is a key to other spaces. I've found a place where, for a night or two, the streets curve in unfamiliar ways. If I walk here, I might find insight, or I might be touched by madness.



One thing I recall is way back in Cata, during the Well of Eternity dungeon when you had to fight her royal guards while she watches and is capable of mind controlling you if you got too close to her.
It makes me wonder if maybe she might have mind control powers over the Naga, or because of her deal with N'zoth that she has full control over them after they've been changed from Highborne to Naga.
I might be wrong, and correct me on it, but the Naga feel like they forgotten they used to be Highborne with the only exception being Azshara. (That's just my angle on it)
It's not an illusion. She gets knocked off her feet multiple times by Farondis' fireballs, fireballs that, if she were still in her actual form behind an illusion, would have been striking the bottom of her tail. It's a magical apperance that alters her physical form, literally the same thing as a visage.
No, it's literally a magical transformation that happens instantly and carries on into children.Its literally a mutation.
So are Satyr, Nightfallen, corrupted Arrakkoa and every single flesh-cursed titanforged, all of which we've seen go away with more magic. What are you not getting about transformations not precluding going back or transforming into something else in this setting? If you can shove fel magic into a devolved, cursed arrakoa and turn it back into a regular arrakoa, and shove arcane and nature magic into a Nightfallen to turn it back into a Nightborne, and shove astral magic into a Satyr and turn it back into a Night Elf, and shoot titan tech lasers at something changed by the curse of flesh to turn it back into a titanforged... why the hell would you assume that for some reason, out of all of the transformations in the setting, Naga are uniquely permanent and totally can't be turned into anything else?
The only assumption to my logic is that this magical transformation works exactly like all the other magical transformations in this setting, including the titanforged's transformation, which was also an old god corruption transformation that has lasted generations and can still be undone with a bit of magic-tech.There is a lot of assumption to your logic, thats what I found silly. Basically we know next to nothing, so its better to assume it was just an illusion/spell and nothing more.
"She has literally already done it once, but I'll wait until she does it again before I accept that it's possible she could do it."I will wait till she does something like that again in the future and spefically in what context. Because this has hardly any ground.
Okay, lol.
Last edited by Foreign Exchange Ztudent; 2023-08-21 at 08:59 PM.
I no longer reply to quotations beyond if you're asking a genuine question or have a non-confrontational stance.