https://www.wowhead.com/ptr-2/npc=20...ina-proudmoore
She makes her return in 10.2 along with Broll Bearmantle, Malfurion and Tess Greymane.
https://www.wowhead.com/ptr-2/npc=20...ina-proudmoore
She makes her return in 10.2 along with Broll Bearmantle, Malfurion and Tess Greymane.
"If you want to play alongside High and Void elves, the Alliance is waiting for you"
Thrall is obviously going to work very well on any expansion set on Azeroth or Draenor. That goes without saying.You keep saying this but its a bit reductive: Undermine was included in early maps of Azeroth, along with other locations that still aren't represented in the game. They weren't "planned to be included in vanilla" the way dragon isles were, with it reaching the point where they actually started modeling the landmass. The Dragon Isles were actually off the coast of northern lordaeron, but they were never planning to include non EK/Kalimdor adjacent locations in vanilla.
Would be more accurate to say "they were brought up during Brainstorming sessions for Vanilla WoW".
And Thrall is a poster child for WoW in general. I wouldn't even try to draw any conclusions from his inclusion beyond "there's going to be something WoW related", which we already knew anyway.
This. He’d have relevance on anything that could hurt the world/horde, and the void would very well threaten both.
Not to mention Teriz keeps forgetting that Thrall was the other main boss in the Visions of N’zoth.
It’s likely blizzard has some plan for him in a void expansion and the visions were hinting at it.
Thrall is definitely the poster child for Warcraft, much like how Tracer is for Overwatch.
Jaina is definitely up there with him but there’s no way she takes precedent over Thrall.
So Towelliee was referring to Cataclysm classic, something we already have good datamined evidence for. So not insider information, just a very safe guess.Uh, it's about half & half. Lot of Hardcore streamers & mythic+ key streamers.As someone who plays both, the toxicity is about the same.Do you think the developers are going to say "Instead of making bad content for classic like we do for retail, let's try making good content." They were never trying to alienate fans of classic. Why would new content they make for it now be received differently?Your assertion Classic is able to gain new players but Retail isn't is 100% wrong. This might be the route they take if more people are playing classic than retail, but I don't think that's true. Wotlk classic's retention between patches have been pretty bad. Half the guilds on Grobbulus have stopped raiding entirely until ICC comes out if they haven't disbanded entirely.
If memory serves, that image was posted by an official Warcraft account.
Gimme a min, I'll try and wrangle it if I can.
Got it, it's from the official Warcraft account:
https://twitter.com/Warcraft/status/1705313777099448456
Last edited by Auxis; 2023-09-24 at 02:51 PM.
My Nintendo FC is 2208-5726-4303.By Blizzard Entertainment:
Part of the reason is that Battlegrounds are like ducks.
That's the point. Anybody who treats it differently depending on which development branch it belongs likely isn't judging based on the actual quality, since it'd be made by the same people either way.
- - - Updated - - -
It's from @Warcraft.
this leak posted August 27th fits a lot of what we have been seeing the past few days/weeks
ka'resh -from the scale face leak
undermine from the toweliee cave stuff
underwater zone with naga- we got the naga backpack and hints of a Azshara return in-game
traveling by boat- we have all the new boat models
thrall having a campaign - he's the key art for Blizzcon
I didn't really think anything of this leak but it seems like it could be piecing together. I guess we will see if the trademark comes soon as said by the exdev Twitter account, it's also interesting that the exdev account posted all their stuff in late August as well.
Last edited by Mysticdoll; 2023-09-24 at 03:10 PM.
It’s an awful name, though. I’d be very happy with that being the actual expansion. Just give it a better name.
In fact, the Void storm itself seems like it would make for the expansions pre patch content and lines up with pre patch content we’ve had before.
Last edited by Santandame; 2023-09-24 at 03:28 PM.
Thrall being on the Blizzcon art means nothing. We don't have a singular characters who is ultra-relevant right now (NPC who acts a main character), like Sylvanas, or Illidan. They are not gonna spoil the next expansion (and they've only done that once), and all the other key art characters are just random characters from the respective franchise even if they are not relevant in the moment.
Thrall is the quintessential Warcraft character, plus Metzen is back.
Worth keeping in mind that expansions tend to have a poster child that is really thematically consistent with the expansion.
Jaina was specifically connected to Kul Tiras as daughter of the grand admiral, not just "a mage in the Alliance".
Sylvanas was specifically linked to death and the Shadowlands as banshee queen and servant of the Jailer, not just "a cool Elven ranger".
Alexstrasza was specifically linked to the Dragon Isles because she's she Queen of the Dragons, not just a cool dragon.
Thrall is likely on the cover specifically because he's the World Shaman, because I doubt we're getting a Horde centric expansion.
I would say Alexstrasza would be considered ultra-relevant. She is literally the poster character for the main DF key art (https://wow.zamimg.com/uploads/scree...al/1059098.jpg)
Also, if they have used a main character for a future expansion as a representative in the Blizzcon art before, that absolutely does not rule out Thrall being the poster character for the next expansion. They can do it again, it's possible. Anything is possible; and if they've done it before it cannot be ruled out.
Last edited by Auxis; 2023-09-24 at 03:41 PM.
My Nintendo FC is 2208-5726-4303.By Blizzard Entertainment:
Part of the reason is that Battlegrounds are like ducks.